Heritability and genetic correlation between the sexes in a songbird sexual ornament

Heredity

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 945-954

  Potti, J ^a   Canal, D ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ficedula hypoleuca; maternal effects; sexual dimorphism; sexual selection; threshold traits; Z chromosome

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; HERITABILITY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; ORNAMENTATION; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONGBIRD;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SONGBIRD;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC LINKAGE; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX CHROMOSOMES; SONGBIRDS;

FICEDULA HYPOLEUCA; PASSERI; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 79956365460     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2010.142     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Amundsen T (2000). Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol Evol 15: 149-155. (Pubitemid 30151592)
2. Badyaev AV (2002). Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 369-378. (Pubitemid 34775258)
3. Becker WA (1984). Manual of Quantitative Genetics. Academic Enterprises: Pullman, Washington, DC.
4. Bonduriansky R, Rowe L (2005). Intralocus sexual conflict and the genetic architecture of sexually dimorphic traits in Prochyliza xanthostoma (Diptera: Piophilidae). Evolution 59: 1965-1975. (Pubitemid 41384380)
5. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF (2009). Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 280-288.
6. Brün J, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T (1996). Parentage analyses in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) at thewestern boundary of its central European range. J Orn 137: 435-446. (Pubitemid 126571591)
7. Charlesworth B, Coyne JA, Barton N (1987). The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am Nat 130: 113-146.
8. Charmantier A, Réale D (2005). How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild? Mol Ecol 14: 2839-2850. (Pubitemid 41576965)
9. Cramp S, Perrins CM (1993). Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa Volume VII: Flycatchers to Shrikes. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
10. Darwin C (1874). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Spanish translation, 1989.El origen del hombre y la selección en relación al sexo EDAF: Madrid.
11. Dufty Jr AM, Clobert J, Møller AP (2002). Hormones, developmental plasticity and adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol 174: 190-196. (Pubitemid 34219313)
12. Ellegren H (2009). Genomic evidence for a large-Z effect. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 361-366.
13. Ellegren H, Hultin-Rosenberg L, Brunström B, Dencker L, Kultima K, Scholz B (2007). Faced with inequality: chicken do not have a general dosage compensation of sex-linked genes. BMC Biol 5: 40, http://www.biomedcentral.com/ 1741-7007/5/40.
14. Fairbairn DJ, Roff DA (2006). The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism: assessing the importance of sex-linkage. Heredity 97: 319-328. (Pubitemid 44639517)
15. Falconer DS, MacKay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th edn. Longmann: London.
16. Fisher RA (1958). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. 2nd edn. Dover: New York.
17. Fitzpatrick MJ (2004). Pleiotropy and the genomic location of sexually selected genes. Am Nat 163: 800-808. (Pubitemid 38852135)
18. Gelter HP, Tegelström M (1992). High frequency of extra-pair paternity in Swedish Pied Flycatchers revealed by allozyme electrophoresis and DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31: 1-7. (Pubitemid 23401807)
19. Gil D, Lacroiz A, Potti J (2006). Within-clutch variation in yolk androgens in relation to female expression of a male ornament in pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Ardeola 53: 307-315.
20. Griggio M, Devigili A, Hoi H, Pilastro A (2009). Female ornamentation and directional male mate preference in the rock sparrow. Behav Ecol 20: 1072-1078.
21. Hegyi G, Török J, Tóth J (2002). Qualitative population divergence in proximate determination of a sexually selected trait in the collared flycatcher. J Evol Biol 15: 710-719. (Pubitemid 35008354)
22. Houde AE (1992). Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural population of Poediia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) (guppies). Heredity 69: 229-235. (Pubitemid 23402376)
23. Itoh Y, Melamed E, Yang X, Kampf K, Wang S, Yehy N et al. (2007). Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals. J Biol 6: 2.
24. Iyengar VK, Reeve HK, Eisner T (2002). Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference. Nature 419: 830-832. (Pubitemid 35238567)
25. Kimball RT, Ligon JD (1999). Evolution of avian plumage dichromatism from a proximate perspective. Am Nat 154: 182-193. (Pubitemid 29427388)
26. Kirkpatrick M, Hall DW (2004). Male-biased mutation, sex linkage, and the rate of adaptive evolution. Evolution 57: 437-440. (Pubitemid 38362388)
27. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991). The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33-38. (Pubitemid 21926110)
28. Lande R (1980). Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305. (Pubitemid 10031375)
29. Lande R (1987). Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating preferences. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds). Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. John Wiley and Sons: Dahlem, pp 83-94.
30. Lehtonen PK, Laaksonen T, Artemyev AV, Belskii E, Both C, Bureš S et al. (2009). Geographic patterns of genetic differentiation and plumage colour variation are different in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Mol Ecol 18: 4463-4476.
31. Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T, Lampe HM (1991). Low frequency of extrapair paternity in pied flycatcher revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29: 95-101.
32. Lundberg A, Alatalo RV (1992). The Pied Flycatcher. Poyser: London.
33. Lynch M, Walsh B (1997). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer: Sunderland, MA.
34. Mank JE, Axelsson E, Ellegren H (2007). Fast-X on the Z: rapid evolution of sex-linked genes in birds. Genome Res 17: 618-624. (Pubitemid 46715512)
35. Mank JE, Ellegren H (2007). Parallel divergence and degradation of the avian W sex chromosome. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 389-391. (Pubitemid 47058776)
36. Mank JE, Ellegren H (2009). Sex-linkage of sexually antagonistic genes is predicted by female, but not male, effects in birds. Evolution 63: 1464-1472.
37. Mank JE, Hall DW, Kirkpatrick M, Avise JC (2006). Sex chromosomes and male ornaments: a comparative evaluation in ray-finned fishes. Proc R Soc Lond B 273: 233-236. (Pubitemid 46768097)
38. Mank JE, Hultin-Rosenberg L, Zwahlen M, Ellegren H (2008). Pleiotropic constraint hampers the resolution of sexual antagonism in vertebrate gene expression. Am Nat 171: 35-43. (Pubitemid 351226026)
39. Mank JE, Vicoso B, Berlin S, Charlesworth B (2010). Effective population size and the faster-X effect: empirical results and their interpretation. Evolution 64: 663.
40. McKenna NJ, O'Malley BW (2002). Combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear receptors and coregulators. Cell 108: 465-474. (Pubitemid 34260872)
41. Merilä J, Sheldon BC (2001). Avian quantitative genetics. In: Nolan V, Ketterson E (eds). Current Ornithology, Vol. 16 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York, pp 179-255.
42. Merilä J, Sheldon BC, Ellegren H (1998). Quantitative genetics of sexual size dimorphism in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Evolution 52: 870-876. (Pubitemid 28324513)
43. Møller AP (1993). Sexual selection in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica. III Female tail ornaments. Evolution 47: 417-431.
44. Moore AJ, Moore PJ (2006). Genetics of sexual selection. In: Fox CW, Wolf JB (eds). Evolutionary Genetics Concepts and Case Studies. Oxford University Press: New York, pp 339-349.
45. Morales J, Moreno J, Merino S, Sanz JJ, Tomás G, Arriero E et al. (2007). Female ornaments in the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: associations with age, health and reproductive success. Ibis 149: 245-254. (Pubitemid 46525251)
46. Moreno J, Martínez JG, Morales J, Lobato E, Merino S, Tomás G et al. (2010). Paternity loss in relation to male age, territorial behaviour and stress in the pied flycatcher. Ethology 116: 76-84.
47. Nagylaki T 1978. The correlation between relatives with assortative mating. Ann Hum Genet 42: 131-137. (Pubitemid 8379815)
48. O'Neill M, Binder M, Smith C, Andrews J, Reed K, Smith M et al. (2000). ASW: a gene with conserved avian W-linkage and female specific expression in chick embryonic gonad. Dev Genes Evol 210: 243-249. (Pubitemid 30234961)
49. Osorno JL, Morales J, Moreno J, Merino S, Tomás G, Vásquez R (2006). Evidence for differential maternal allocation to eggs in relation to manipulated male attractiveness in the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). J Ornithol 147: 605-611. (Pubitemid 44523994)
50. Poissant J, Wilson AJ, Coltman DW (2009). Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations. Evolution 64: 97-107.
51. Potti J (1993). A male trait expressed in female pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca: the white forehead patch. Anim Behav 45: 1245-1247.
52. Potti J (1999). Maternal effects and the pervasive impact of nestling history on egg size in a passerine bird. Evolution 53: 279-285. (Pubitemid 29300679)
53. Potti J (2008). Temperature during egg formation and the effect of climate warming on egg size in a small songbird. Acta Oecol 33: 387-393.
54. Potti J, Blanco G, Lemus JA, Canal D (2007). Infectious offspring: how birds acquire and transmit an avian polyomavirus in the wild. PLoS ONE 2: e1276.
55. Potti J, Merino S (1994). Heritability estimates and maternal effects on tarsus length in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Oecologia 100: 331-338.
56. Potti J, Merino S (1996a). Decreased levels of blood trypanosome infection correlate with female expression of a male secondary sexual trait: implications for sexual selection. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 1199-1204. (Pubitemid 26340734)
57. Potti J, Merino S (1996b). Parasites and the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in a passerine bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 9-12. (Pubitemid 26044434)
58. Potti J, Montalvo S (1991a). Male arrival and female mate choice in pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in central Spain. Ornis Scand 22: 45-54.
59. Potti J, Montalvo S (1991b). Return rate, age at first breeding and natal dispersal of Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in central Spain. Ardea 79: 419-428.
60. Price DK (1996). Sexual selection, selection load and quantitative genetics of zebra finch bill colour. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 217-221.
61. Price DK, Burley NT (1993). Constraints on the evolution of attractive traits: genetic (co)variance of zebra finch bill colour. Heredity 71: 405-412.
62. Price DK, Burley NT (1994). Constraints on the evolution of attractive traits: selection in male and female zebra finches. Am Nat 144: 908-934.
63. Qvarnström A (1999). Genotype-by-environment interactions in the determination of the size of a secondary sexual character in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Evolution 53: 1564-1572. (Pubitemid 29524149)
64. Qvarnström A, Bailey RI (2008). Speciation through evolution of sex-linked genes. Heredity 102: 4-15.
65. Qvarnström A, Brommer JE, Gustafsson L (2006). Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 441: 84-86.
66. R Development Core Team (2005). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Reference Index. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org.
67. Reinhold K (1998). Sex linkage among genes controlling sexually selected traits. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44: 1-7. (Pubitemid 28514639)
68. Rice WR (1984). Sex-chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735-742.
69. Rice WR (1988). The effect of sex chromosomes on the rate of evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 3: 2-3.
70. Roff DA (1997). Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman and Hall: New York.
71. Roulin A, Dijkstra C (2003). Genetic and environmental components of variation in eumelanin and phaeomelanin sex traits in the barn owl. Heredity 90: 359-364. (Pubitemid 36610574)
72. Roulin A, Dijkstra C, Riols C, Ducrest A-L (2001). Female- and male-specific signals of quality in the barn owl. J Evol Biol 14: 255-266. (Pubitemid 32333198)
73. Rowe L, Day T (2006). Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution. Phil Trans R Soc B 361: 277-285. (Pubitemid 44870114)
74. Rowe L, Houle D (1996). The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 1415-1421.
75. Sætre G-P, Borge T, Lindross K, Haavie J, Sheldon BC, Primmer C et al. (2003). Sex chromosome evolution and speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 53-59. (Pubitemid 36140422)
76. Sæther SA, Sætre GP, Borge T, Wiley C, Svedin N, Andersson G et al. (2007). Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 318: 95-97. (Pubitemid 47538039)
77. SAS Institute Inc (2004). SAS/STATs 9.1. User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc.: Cary.
78. Sheldon BC, Merilä J, Qvarnström A, Gustafsson L, Ellegren H (1997). Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proc R Soc Lond B 264: 297-302.
79. Statsoft Inc (1996). Statistica for Windows, Release 5. Computer Program Manual: Tulsa, OK.
80. Storchová R, Reif J, Nachman MW (2009). Female heterogamety and speciation: reduced introgression of the Z chromosome between two species of nightingales. Evolution 64: 456-471.
81. Trivers R (1985). Social Evolution. Benjamin/Cummings Publ Co: Menlo Park, CA.
82. Ward PI (2000). Sperm length is heritable and sex-linked in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria). J Zool Lond 251: 349-353. (Pubitemid 30466641)
83. Watson NL, Simmons LW (2010). Male and female secondary sexual traits show different patterns of quantitative genetic and environmental variation in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius. J Evol Biol 23: 2397-2402.
84. Williams TM, Carroll SB (2009). Genetic and molecular insights into the development and evolution of sexual dimorphism. Nature Rev 10: 797-804.
85. Wright D, Kerge S, Brändström H, Schütz K, Kindmark A, Andersson L et al. (2007). The genetic architecture of a female sexual ornament. Evolution 62: 86-98.