Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures using CT lateral scout views: A comparison of semi-automated quantitative vertebral morphometry and radiologist semi-quantitative grading

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1007-1016

  Kim, Y M ^a,b,c   Demissie, S ^d   Genant, H K ^e   Cheng, X ^f   Yu, W ^g   Samelson, E J ^b,h   Kiel, D P ^b,h   Bouxsein, M L ^a,b  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Mizmedi Hospital   (South Korea)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^g PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^h Hebrew Senior Life   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Quantitative vertebral morphometry; Semi automated vertebral morphometry; Semi quantitative; Validity; Vertebral fracture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SEMI AUTOMATED QUANTITATIVE VERTEBRAL MORPHOMETRY MEASUREMENT; SEMI QUANTITATIVE MORPHOMETRY; VERTEBRA FRACTURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; SPINAL FRACTURES; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84857443041     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1774-z     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. JA Kanis O Johnell C De Laet H Johansson A Oden P Delmas J Eisman S Fujiwara P Garnero H Kroger EV McCloskey D Mellstrom LJ Melton H Pols J Reeve A Silman A Tenenhouse 2004 A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk Bone 35 375 382 15268886 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czmsVCntg%3D%3D 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024 (Pubitemid 38953182)
2. LJ Melton III SH Kan MA Frye HW Wahner WM O'Fallon BL Riggs 1989 Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women Am J Epidemiol 129 1000 1011 2784934 (Pubitemid 19123937)
3. CM Klotzbuecher PD Ross PB Landsman TA Abbott 3rd M Berger 2000 Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis J Bone Miner Res 15 721 739 10780864 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ktFOktA%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.721 (Pubitemid 30174026)
4. LJ Melton 3rd AW Lane C Cooper R Eastell WM O'Fallon BL Riggs 1993 Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities Osteoporos Int 3 113 119 8481586 10.1007/BF01623271 (Pubitemid 23125371)
5. S van Helden J Cals F Kessels P Brink GJ Dinant P Geusens 2006 Risk of new clinical fractures within 2 years following a fracture Osteoporos Int 17 348 354 16378167 10.1007/s00198-005-2026-x
6. R Lindsay SL Silverman C Cooper DA Hanley I Barton SB Broy A Licata L Benhamou P Geusens K Flowers H Stracke E Seeman 2001 Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture Jama 285 320 323 11176842 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7kslamtw%3D%3D 10.1001/jama.285.3.320 (Pubitemid 32095035)
7. SH Gehlbach C Bigelow M Heimisdottir S May M Walker JR Kirkwood 2000 Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting Osteoporos Int 11 577 582 11069191 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtF2gtA%3D%3D 10.1007/s001980070078
8. SR Majumdar N Kim I Colman AM Chahal G Raymond H Jen KG Siminoski DA Hanley BH Rowe 2005 Incidental vertebral fractures discovered with chest radiography in the emergency department: prevalence, recognition, and osteoporosis management in a cohort of elderly patients Arch Intern Med 165 905 909 15851642 10.1001/archinte.165.8.905 (Pubitemid 40563237)
9. AL Williams A Al-Busaidi PJ Sparrow JE Adams RW Whitehouse 2009 Under-reporting of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on computed tomography Eur J Radiol 69 179 183 17913429 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.028
10. HK Genant CY Wu C van Kuijk MC Nevitt 1993 Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique J Bone Miner Res 8 1137 1148 8237484 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FlsFyhuw%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650080915 (Pubitemid 23261108)
11. G Jiang R Eastell NA Barrington L Ferrar 2004 Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 15 887 896 15071725 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crhvFWktw%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-004-1626-1 (Pubitemid 39506455)
12. LM Hurxthal 1968 Measurement of anterior vertebral compressions and biconcave vertebrae Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 103 635 644 5659979 1:STN:280:DyaF1czhvValtw%3D%3D
13. JT Schousboe T Vokes SB Broy L Ferrar F McKiernan C Roux N Binkley 2008 Vertebral fracture assessment: the 2007 ISCD official positions J Clin Densitom 11 92 108 18442755 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.008 (Pubitemid 351602190)
14. L Ferrar G Jiang JT Schousboe CR DeBold R Eastell 2008 Algorithm-based qualitative and semiquantitative identification of prevalent vertebral fracture: agreement between different readers, imaging modalities, and diagnostic approaches J Bone Miner Res 23 417 424 17967136 10.1359/jbmr.071032 (Pubitemid 351304672)
15. S Prevrhal JH Krege P Chen H Genant DM Black 2009 Teriparatide vertebral fracture risk reduction determined by quantitative and qualitative radiographic assessment Curr Med Res Opin 25 921 928 19250060 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjsFylur8%3D 10.1185/03007990902790993
16. F Grados J Fechtenbaum E Flipon S Kolta C Roux P Fardellone 2009 Radiographic methods for evaluating osteoporotic vertebral fractures Joint Bone Spine 76 241 247 19196531 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.07.017
17. DM Black SR Cummings K Stone E Hudes L Palermo P Steiger 1991 A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions J Bone Min Res 6 883 892 1:STN:280:DyaK387ltFyhtw%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650060814
18. HK Genant M Jergas L Palermo M Nevitt RS Valentin D Black SR Cummings 1996 Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group J Bone Miner Res 11 984 996 8797120 1:STN:280:DyaK28zptVShtA%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650110716 (Pubitemid 26200050)
19. A Brett CG Miller CW Hayes J Krasnow T Ozanian K Abrams JE Block C van Kuijk 2009 Development of a clinical workflow tool to enhance the detection of vertebral fractures: accuracy and precision evaluation Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 2437 2443 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b2eb69
20. Kim YM, Demissie S, Eisenberg R, Samelson EJ, Kiel DP, Bouxsein ML (2011) Intra-and inter-reader reliability of semi-automated quantitative morphometry measurements and vertebral fracture assessment using lateral scout views from computed tomography. Osteoporos Int. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1530-4
21. GA Rosito JM Massaro U Hoffmann FL Ruberg AA Mahabadi RS Vasan CJ O'Donnell CS Fox 2008 Pericardial fat, visceral abdominal fat, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and vascular calcification in a community-based sample: the Framingham Heart Study Circulation 117 605 613 18212276 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743062
22. F Moselewski CJ O'Donnell S Achenbach M Ferencik J Massaro A Nguyen RC Cury S Abbara IK Jang TJ Brady U Hoffmann 2005 Calcium concentration of individual coronary calcified plaques as measured by multidetector row computed tomography Circulation 111 3236 3241 15956133 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXltVKmtr8%3D 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.489781 (Pubitemid 40874995)
23. KM Pou JM Massaro U Hoffmann K Lieb RS Vasan CJ O'Donnell CS Fox 2009 Patterns of abdominal fat distribution: the Framingham Heart Study Diabetes Care 32 481 485 19074995 10.2337/dc08-1359
24. T Lang A LeBlanc H Evans Y Lu H Genant A Yu 2004 Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight J Bone Miner Res 19 1006 1012 15125798 10.1359/JBMR.040307 (Pubitemid 41103458)
25. DM Black L Palermo MC Nevitt HK Genant R Epstein R San Valentin SR Cummings 1995 Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures J Bone Miner Res 10 890 902 7572313 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fht1antg%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650100610
26. J Cohen 1960 A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales Educ Psychol Meas 20 37 46 10.1177/001316446002000104
27. Fleiss J (1981) The measurement of interrater agreement. Statistical Method for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, pp 211-236
28. M Takada CY Wu TF Lang HK Genant 1998 Vertebral fracture assessment using the lateral scoutview of computed tomography in comparison with radiographs Osteoporos Int 8 197 203 9797902 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FhsVKgtA%3D%3D 10.1007/s001980050054 (Pubitemid 28427067)
29. EJ Samelson BA Christiansen S Demissie KE Broe Y Zhou CA Meng W Yu X Cheng CJ O'Donnell U Hoffmann HK Genant DP Kiel ML Bouxsein 2011 Reliability of vertebral fracture assessment using multidetector CT lateral scout views: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study Osteoporos Int 22 1123 1131 20495902 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M3it1Chsg%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-010-1290-6
30. SH Kim HS Choi Y Rhee KJ Kim SK Lim 2011 Prevalent vertebral fractures predict subsequent radiographic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Korean women receiving antiresorptive agent Osteoporos Int 22 781 787 20533028 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7nt1Onug%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-010-1298-y
31. L Ferrar G Jiang NA Barrington R Eastell 2000 Identification of vertebral deformities in women: comparison of radiological assessment and quantitative morphometry using morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry J Bone Miner Res 15 575 585 10750573 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ht1Kisw%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.3.575 (Pubitemid 30134103)
32. F Grados C Roux MC de Vernejoul G Utard JL Sebert P Fardellone 2001 Comparison of four morphometric definitions and a semiquantitative consensus reading for assessing prevalent vertebral fractures Osteoporos Int 12 716 722 11605736 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrlvFelug%3D%3D 10.1007/s001980170046 (Pubitemid 32954627)
33. IC Hospers JG van der Laan CJ Zeebregts P Nieboer BH Wolffenbuttel RA Dierckx HG Kreeftenberg PL Jager RH Slart 2009 Vertebral fracture assessment in supine position: comparison by using conventional semiquantitative radiography and visual radiography Radiology 251 822 828 19380691 10.1148/radiol.2513080887
34. JA Rea MB Chen J Li GM Blake P Steiger HK Genant I Fogelman 2000 Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of prevalent vertebral deformity identification J Bone Miner Res 15 564 574 10750572 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ht1Kisg%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.3.564 (Pubitemid 30134102)
35. T Fuerst C Wu HK Genant G von Ingersleben Y Chen C Johnston MJ Econs N Binkley TJ Vokes G Crans BH Mitlak 2009 Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting Osteoporos Int 20 1199 1205 19083074 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzptVylsg%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-008-0806-9
36. RD Chapurlat F Duboeuf HO Marion-Audibert B Kalpakcioglu BH Mitlak PD Delmas 2006 Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture Osteoporos Int 17 1189 1195 16758133 1:STN:280: DC%2BD28vpslSitQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-006-0121-2
37. CY Wu J Li M Jergas HK Genant 1995 Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures Osteoporos Int 5 354 370 8800786 1:STN:280:DyaK287gvFynsw%3D%3D 10.1007/BF01622258
38. EV McCloskey S Vasireddy J Threlkeld J Eastaugh A Parry N Bonnet M Beneton JA Kanis D Charlesworth 2008 Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) with a densitometer predicts future fractures in elderly women unselected for osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 23 1561 1568 18505372 10.1359/jbmr.080515
39. MG Roberts TF Cootes JE Adams 2005 Vertebral shape: automatic measurement with dynamically sequenced active appearance models Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 8 733 740 16686025 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283mtFOjsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43828430)
40. M De Bruijne MT Lund LB Tanko PP Pettersen M Nielsen 2006 Quantitative vertebral morphometry using neighbor-conditional shape models Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9 1 8 17354867 (Pubitemid 44609083)
41. M Roberts TF Cootes JE Adams 2006 Vertebral morphometry: semiautomatic determination of detailed shape from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images using active appearance models Invest Radiol 41 849 859 17099422 10.1097/01.rli.0000244343.27431.26 (Pubitemid 44747112)
42. M Roberts T Cootes E Pacheco J Adams 2007 Quantitative vertebral fracture detection on DXA images using shape and appearance models Acad Radiol 14 1166 1178 17889334 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.012 (Pubitemid 47418689)
43. M de Bruijne MT Lund LB Tanko PC Pettersen M Nielsen 2007 Quantitative vertebral morphometry using neighbor-conditional shape models Med Image Anal 11 503 512 17720611 10.1016/j.media.2007.07.004 (Pubitemid 47365758)
44. MG Roberts EM Pacheco R Mohankumar TF Cootes JE Adams 2010 Detection of vertebral fractures in DXA VFA images using statistical models of appearance and a semiautomatic segmentation Osteoporos Int 21 2037 2046 20135093 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cbltVOqtA%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-009-1169-6