Vertebral fracture assessment using the lateral scoutview of computed tomography in comparison with radiographs

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 197-203

  Takada, M ^a   Wu, C Y ^a   Lang, T F ^a   Genant, H K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Osteoporosis; Radiograph; Scoutview; Semiquantitative technique; Vertebral fracture assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOISE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THORACIC SPINE; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; VERTEBRA FRACTURE;

NON-PROGRAMMATIC;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FRACTURES, SPONTANEOUS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; SPINAL FRACTURES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0031698558     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001980050054     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL. Melton LJ III. Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1991:6:207-15.
2. Smith-Bindman R. Cummings SR, Steiger P, Genant HK. A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Res 1991:6:25-34.
3. Ross PD, Yhee YK. He YF, et al. A new method for vertebral fracture diagnosis. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:167-74.
4. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt M. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi-quantitative technique, J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137-48.
5. Wu CY, Li J, Jergas M. Genant HK. Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:354-70.
6. Black DM, Cummings SR, Stone K, et al. A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:883-92.
7. Black DM, Palermo L. Nevitt MC, et al. Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1995:10:890-902.
8. Genant HK. Jergas M. van Kuijk C. Vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. Radiology Research and Education Foundation. San Francisco. University of California Printing Services. 1996.
9. Steiger P, Cummings SR. Genant HK. Weiss H. Morphometric X-ray absorpuometry of the spine: correlation in vivo with morphometric radiography. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Osteoporos Int 1994:4:238-44.
10. Lang T. Takada M, Gee R. et al. A preliminary evaluation of the Lunar Expert-XL for bone densitometry and vertebral morpho-metry. J Bone Miner Res 1997:12:136-43.
11. Katragadda CS. Fogel SR. Cohen G. et al. Digital radiography usina a computed tomographic instrument. Radiology 1979:133:83-7.
12. Cromwell LD, Mack LA, Loop JW. CT scoutview for skull fracture: substitute for skull films? AJNR 1982;3:421-3.
13. Boechat ML Spinal deformities and pseudofractures. AJR 1986:148:97-8.
14. Sener RN. Ripeckyj GT, Otto PM. Rauch RA, Jinkins JR. Recognition of abnormalities on computed scout images in CT examinations of the head and spine. Neuroradiology 1993.35.229-31.
15. Landis JR. Koch CG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977:33:159-74.
16. Ito M,Hayashi K, Yamada M. Nakamura T. Vertebral measurements for assessment of osteoporosis. Br J Radiol 1994:67:759-63.
17. Lewis MK, Blake GM. Fogelman I. Patient dose in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int 1994;4:11-5.