Algorithm-based qualitative and semiquantitative identification of prevalent vertebral fracture: Agreement between different readers, imaging modalities, and diagnostic approaches

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 417-424

  Ferrar, Lynne ^a,c   Jiang, Guirong ^a   Schousboe, John T ^b   Debold, Charles R ^b   Eastell, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b PARK NICOLLET INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Osteoporosis; Vertebral fracture; X ray absorptiometry

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTIOMETRY; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KAPPA STATISTICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREVALENCE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; READING; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VERTEBRA FRACTURE; X RAY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PREVALENCE; SPINAL FRACTURES; SPINE;

EID: 39749147682     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.071032     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA III, Berger M 2000 Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: A summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721-739.
2. Vokes T, Bachman D, Baim S, Binkley N, Broy S, Ferrar L, Lewiecki EM, Richmond B, Schousboe J 2006 Vertebral fracture assessment: The 2005 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom 9:37-46.
3. Blake GM, Rea JA, Fogelman I 1997 Vertebral morphometry studies using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Semin Nucl Med 27:276-290.
4. Ferrar L, Jiang G, Eastell R, Peel NF 2003 Visual identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis using morphometric X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 18:933-938.
5. Ferrar L, Jiang G, Barrington NA, Eastell R 2000 Identification of vertebral deformities in women: Comparison of radiological assessment and quantitative morphometry using morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 15:575-585.
6. Rea JA, Li J, Blake GM, Steiger P, Genant HK, Fogelman I 2000 Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: A highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity. Osteoporos Int 11:660-668.
7. Rea JA, Chen MB, Li J, Blake GM, Steiger P, Genant HK, Fogelman I 2000 Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: A comparison of prevalent vertebral deformity identification. J Bone Miner Res 15:564-574.
8. Schousboe JT, Debold CR 2006 Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 17:281-289.
9. Schousboe JT, Debold CR, Bowles C, Glickstein S, Rubino RK 2002 Prevalence of vertebral compression fracture deformity by X-ray absorptiometry of lateral thoracic and lumbar spines in a population referred for bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom 5:239-246.
10. Chappard C, Kolta S, Fechtenbaum J, Dougados M, Roux C 1998 Clinical evaluation of spine morphometric X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Rheumatol 37:496-501.
11. Binkley N, Krueger D, Gangnon R, Genant HK, Drezner MK 2005 Lateral vertebral assessment: A valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 16:1513-1518.
12. Genant HK, Wu CY, Van KC, Nevitt MC 1993 Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137-1148.
13. Jiang G, Eastell R, Barrington NA, Ferrar L 2004 Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 15:887-896.
14. Altman D 1991 Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
15. Leidig-Bruckner G, Limberg B, Felsenberg D, Bruckner T, Holder S, Kather A, Miksch J, Wuster C, Ziegler R, Scheidt-Nave C 2000 Sex difference in the validity of vertebral deformities as an index of prevalent vertebral osteoporotic fractures: A population survey of older men and women. Osteoporos Int 11:102-119.
16. Grigoryan M, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Delmas PD, Genant HK 2003 Recognizing and reporting osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Spine J 12(Suppl 2):S104-S112.
17. Melton LJ III, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL 1999 Secondary osteoporosis and the risk of vertebral deformities in women. Bone 24:49-55.
18. Matthis C, Weber U, O'Neill TW, Raspe H 1998 Health impact associated with vertebral deformities: Results from the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS). Osteoporos Int 8:364-372.
19. Ettinger B, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Rundle AC, Cauley JA. Cummings SR, Genant HK 1992 Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 7:449-456.
20. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, Minshall ME, Shen W, Cooper C, Kanis J 2000 Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384-1392.
21. Vokes TJ, Dixon LB, Favus MJ 2003 Clinical Utility of dual-energy vertebral assessment (DVA). Osteoporos Int 14:871-878.