Development of a clinical workflow tool to enhance the detection of vertebral fractures: Accuracy and precision evaluation

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 22, 2009, Pages 2437-2443

  Brett, Alan ^a   Miller, Colin G ^b   Hayes, Curtis W ^c   Krasnow, Joel ^d   Ozanian, Takouhi ^a   Abrams, Ken ^e   Block, Jon E ^f   Van Kuijk, Cornelis ^g  

^a Optasia Medical Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b BioClinica Inc   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d HOFFMANN LA ROCHE INC   (United States)

^e NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

^f Jon E Block PhD Inc   (France)

^g VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

fractures; morphometry; Osteoporosis; radiographic; vertebral

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TECHNOLOGY; VERTEBRA FRACTURE; WORKFLOW; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; IMAGE PROCESSING; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINE FRACTURE; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; VERTEBRA;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SPINAL FRACTURES; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; WORKFLOW;

EID: 75549087212     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b2eb69     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. van Helden S, Cals J, Kessels F, et al. Risk of new clinical fractures within 2 years following a fracture. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:348-54.
2. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:721-39.
3. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 2004;35:375-82. (Pubitemid 38953182)
4. Kaptoge S, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D, et al. Whom to treat? The contribution of vertebral X-rays to risk-based algorithms for fracture prediction: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 2006;17:1369-81.
5. Lems WF. Clinical relevance of vertebral fractures. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66:2-4.
6. Delmas PD, Genant HK, Crans GG, et al. Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial. Bone 2003;33:522-32.
7. Ettinger B, Black DM, Nevitt MC, et al. Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:449-56.
8. Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, et al. The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:793-800.
9. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, et al; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1215-20.
10. Kado DM, Duong T, Stone KL, et al. Incident vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 2003;14: 589-94.
11. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:38-42.
12. Lentle BC, Brown JP, Khan A, et al. Recognizing and reporting vertebral fractures: reducing the risk of future osteoporotic fractures. Can Assoc Radiol J 2007;58:27-36.
13. Majumdar SR, Kim N, Colman I, et al. Incidental vertebral fractures discovered with chest radiography in the emergency department: prevalence, recognition, and osteoporosis management in a cohort of elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:905-9.
14. Kim N, Rowe BH, Raymond G, et al. Underreporting of vertebral fractures on routine chest radiography. Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:297-300.
15. Gehlbach SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, et al. Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:577-82.
16. Guermazi A, Mohr A, Grigorian M, et al. Identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;6:241-52.
17. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, et al. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137-48.
18. Black DM, Cummings SR, Stone K, et al. A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:883-92.
19. Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, et al. Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:207-15.
20. McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS, et al. The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. Osteoporos Int 1993;3:138-47.
21. Black DM, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, et al. Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:890-902.
22. Genant HK. Assessment of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research. J Rheumatol 1997;24:1212-4.
23. Genant HK, Jergas M. Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research. Osteoporos Int 2003;14(suppl 3):S43-55.
24. Jackson SA, Tenenhouse A, Robertson L. Vertebral fracture definition from population-based data: preliminary results from the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 2000;11:680-7.
25. Krieger N, Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, et al. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): background, rationale, methods. Can J Aging 1999; 18:376-87.
26. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ. Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision. Proc SPIE Med Imaging 2001;4322:236-48.
27. Smyth PP, Taylor CJ, Adams JE. Vertebral shape: automatic measurement with active shape models. Radiology 1999;211:571-8.
28. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ 1996;313:744.
29. Delmas PD, van de Langerijt L, Watts NB, et al. Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:557-63.
30. Guidelines for Preclinical and Clinical Evaluation of Agents in the Prevention or Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Rockville, MD: Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Drug Products, Food and Drug Administration; 1994:1-23.
31. Gardner JC, von Ingersleben G, Heyano SL, et al. An interactive tutorialbased training technique for vertebral morphometry. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12:63-70.
32. Grados F, Roux C, de Vernejoul MC, et al. Comparison of four morphometric definitions and a semiquantitative consensus reading for assessing prevalent vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:716-22.