Detection of vertebral fractures in DXA VFA images using statistical models of appearance and a semi-automatic segmentation

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2037-2046

  Roberts, M G ^a   Pacheco, E M B ^a,b   Mohankumar, R ^a   Cootes, T F ^a   Adams, J E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Active appearance model; Computer assisted diagnosis; DXA; Osteoporosis; Vertebral fracture assessment

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; MORPHOMETRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERTEBRA; VERTEBRA FRACTURE;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SPINAL FRACTURES;

EID: 78549282395     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1169-6     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. C Cooper T O'Neill A Silman 1993 The epidemiology of vertebral fractures. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group Bone 14 Suppl 1 S89 S97 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90358-H 8110529
2. LJ Melton III EJ Atkinson C Cooper, et al. 1999 Vertebral fractures predict subsequent fractures Osteoporosis Int 10 3 214 221 10.1007/s001980050218 (Pubitemid 29458716)
3. DM Black NK Arden L Palermo, et al. 1999 Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group J Bone Miner Res 14 5 821 828 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3lsFyjtw%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.5.821 10320531 (Pubitemid 29210609)
4. KE Ensrud MC Nevitt L Palermo, et al. 1999 What proportion of incident morphometric vertebral fractures are clinically diagnosed and vice versa? J Bone Miner Res 14 S1 S138
5. SH Gehlbach C Bigelow M Heimisdottir, et al. 2000 Recognition of vertebral fractures in a clinical setting Osteoporos Int 11 7 577 582 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtF2gtA%3D%3D 10.1007/s001980070078 11069191
6. PD Delmas L van de Langerijt NB Watts, et al. 2005 Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study J Bone Miner Res 20 4 557 563 10.1359/JBMR.041214 15765173 (Pubitemid 40393062)
7. L Ferrar G Jiang J Adams R Eastell 2005 Identification of vertebral fractures: an update Osteoporos Int 16 7 717 728 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2MzjsFWisA%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-005-1880-x 15868071 (Pubitemid 40933587)
8. A Guermazi A Mohr M Grigorian, et al. 2002 Identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6 3 241 252 10.1055/s-2002-36722 12541202
9. HK Genant CY Wu C van Kuijk, et al. 1993 Vertebral fracture assessment using a semi-quantitative technique J Bone Miner Res 8 9 1137 1148 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FlsFyhuw%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650080915 8237484
10. DM Black SR Cummings K Stone, et al. 1991 A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions J Bone Miner Res 6 8 883 892 1:STN:280: DyaK387ltFyhtw%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650060814 1785377
11. R Eastell SL Cedel HW Wahner, et al. 1991 Classification of vertebral fractures J Bone Miner Res 6 3 207 215 1:STN:280:DyaK3M3ktVyrtg%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650060302 2035348
12. E McCloskey T Spector K Eyres, et al. 1993 The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials Osteoporos Int 3 3 138 147 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3ksVGgsA%3D%3D 10.1007/BF01623275 8481590
13. G Guglielmi D Diacinti C van Kuijk, et al. 2008 Vertebral morphometry: current methods and recent advances Eur Radiol 18 7 1484 1496 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1czovFSltA%3D%3D 10.1007/s00330-008-0899-8 18351350
14. CY Wu J Li M Jergas, et al. 1995 Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures Osteoporos Int 5 5 354 370 1:STN:280:DyaK287gvFynsw%3D%3D 10.1007/BF01622258 8800786
15. D Black L Palermo MC Nevitt, et al. 1995 Comparison of methods for defining prevalent vertebral deformities: the study of osteoporotic fractures J Bone Miner Res 10 6 890 902 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fht1antg%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650100610 7572313
16. G Jiang R Eastell NA Barrington L Ferrar 2004 Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 15 11 887 896 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crhvFWktw%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-004-1626-1 15071725 (Pubitemid 39506455)
17. JA Rea P Steiger GM Blake, et al. 1998 Optimizing data acquisition and analysis of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry Osteoporos Int 8 2 177 183 1:STN:280:DyaK1czjtFGlug%3D%3D 10.1007/BF02672516 9666943
18. JA Rea J Li GM Blake, et al. 2000 Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity Osteoporos Int 11 8 660 668 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M%2FlsFarsg%3D%3D 10.1007/s001980070063 11095168
19. Cootes TF, Edwards GJ, Taylor CJ (1998) Active appearance models. In: Burkhardt H, Neumann B (eds) Proc. 5th European conference on computer vision. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 484-498
20. TF Cootes GJ Edwards CJ Taylor 2001 Active appearance models IEEE Transactions on Pattern Matching and Machine Intelligence 23 6 681 885 10.1109/34.927467 (Pubitemid 32585279)
21. MG Roberts TF Cootes E Pacheco JE Adams 2007 Quantitative vertebral fracture detection on DXA images using shape and appearance models Acad Radiol 14 10 1166 1178 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.012 17889334 (Pubitemid 47418689)
22. MG Roberts TF Cootes JE Adams 2006 Vertebral morphometry: semiautomatic determination of detailed shape from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images using active appearance models Invest Radiol 41 12 849 859 10.1097/01.rli. 0000244343.27431.26 17099422 (Pubitemid 44747112)
23. GM Blake JA Rea I Fogelman 1997 Vertebral morphometry studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Semin Nucl Med 27 3 276 290 1:STN:280:DyaK2szmsl2jsg%3D%3D 10.1016/S0001-2998(97)80029-3 9224667 (Pubitemid 27291424)
24. L Ferrar G Jiang R Eastell NF Peel 2003 Visual identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: using morphometric x-ray absorptiometry J Bone Miner Res 18 5 933 938 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3ht1Cmtg%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.5.933 12733735 (Pubitemid 37294979)
25. N Binkley D Krueger R Gangnon, et al. 2005 Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures Osteoporos Int 16 12 1513 1518 10.1007/s00198-005-1891-7 15834512 (Pubitemid 41790854)
26. E McCloskey P Selby D de Takats, et al. 2001 Effects of clodronate on vertebral fracture risk in osteoporosis: a 1-year interim analysis Bone 28 3 310 315 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXhvVamtrw%3D 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00437-3 11248662 (Pubitemid 32192956)
27. PP Smyth CJ Taylor JE Adams 1999 Vertebral shape: automatic measurement with active shape models Radiology 211 2 571 578 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ksFahuw%3D%3D 10228545
28. T Vokes D Bachman S Baim, et al. 2006 (2006) Vertebral fracture assessment: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions J Clin Densitom 9 1 37 46 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.006 16731430 (Pubitemid 43775510)
29. L Ferrar G Jiang G Armbrecht, et al. 2007 Is short vertebral height always an osteoporotic fracture? The osteoporosis and ultrasound study (OPUS) Bone 41 5 12 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2szls1eqtA%3D%3D 10.1016/j.bone.2007.03.015 17499570 (Pubitemid 46901058)
30. L Ferrar G Jiang GA Clowes, et al. 2008 Comparison of densitometric and radiographic vertebral fracture assessment using the algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) method in postmenopausal women at low and high risk of fracture J Bone Miner Res 23 1 103 111 10.1359/jbmr.070902 17892377
31. Scott IM, Cootes TF, Taylor CJ (2003) Improving active appearance model matching using local image structure. In: Proceedings of 18th Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging 258-269
32. J Rea P Steiger GM Blake, et al. 1998 Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry: reference data for vertebral dimensions J Bone Miner Res 13 3 464 474 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7osVamuw%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.464 9525347 (Pubitemid 28146229)
33. Roberts MG (2008). Automatic detection and classification of vertebral fracture using statistical models of appearance, PhD Thesis, University of Manchester
34. JL Fleiss 1971 Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters Psychol Bull 76 5 378 382 10.1037/h0031619
35. M de Bruijne M Lund L Tanko, et al. 2007 Quantitative vertebral morphometry using neighbour-conditional shape models Med Image Anal 11 5 503 512 10.1016/j.media.2007.07.004 17720611 (Pubitemid 47365758)