Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1199-1205

  Fuerst, T ^a   Wu, C ^a   Genant, H K ^a,b   Von Ingersleben, G ^a   Chen, Y ^a   Johnston, C ^c   Econs, M J ^c   Binkley, N ^d   Vokes, T J ^e   Crans, G ^f,g   Mitlak, B H ^f  

^a SYNARC INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^f ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

^g ELAN PHARMACEUTICALS   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual X ray absorptiometry; Osteoporosis; Semiquantitative assessment; Vertebral fracture

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGIST; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; VERTEBRA FRACTURE;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINAL FRACTURES;

EID: 67349193861     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0806-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. JA Rea MB Chen J Li 2000 Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of prevalent vertebral deformity identification J Bone Miner Res 15 564 574 (Pubitemid 30134102)
2. P Steiger SR Cummings HK Genant 1994 Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry of the spine: correlation in vivo with morphometric radiography. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group Osteoporos Int 4 238 244
3. C Chappard S Kolta J Fechtenbaum 1998 Clinical evaluation of spine morphometric X-ray absorptiometry Br J Rheumatol 37 496 501
4. JA Rea J Li GM Blake 2000 Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity Osteoporos Int 11 660 668
5. L Ferrar G Jiang R Eastell 2003 Visual identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis using morphometric X-ray absorptiometry J Bone Miner Res 18 933 938 (Pubitemid 37294979)
6. L Ferrar G Jiang NA Barrington 2000 Identification of vertebral deformities in women: comparison of radiological assessment and quantitative morphometry using morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry J Bone Miner Res 15 575 585 (Pubitemid 30134103)
7. L Pavlov GD Gamble IR Reid 2005 Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional radiography for the detection of vertebral fractures J Clin Densitom 8 379 385 (Pubitemid 41690398)
8. JA Rea MB Chen J Li 1999 Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of analysis precision in normal and osteoporotic subjects Osteoporos Int 9 536 544 (Pubitemid 29348570)
9. N Crabtree J Wright A Walgrove 2000 Vertebral morphometry: repeat scan precision using the Lunar Expert-XL and the Hologic 4500A. A study for the 'WISDOM' RCT of hormone replacement therapy Osteoporos Int 11 537 543 (Pubitemid 30681653)
10. L Ferrar G Jiang R Eastell 2001 Short-term precision for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry Osteoporos Int 12 710 715 (Pubitemid 32954626)
11. TJ Vokes LB Dixon MJ Favus 2003 Clinical utility of dual-energy vertebral assessment (DVA) Osteoporos Int 14 871 878 (Pubitemid 38009525)
12. N Binkley D Krueger R Gangnon 2005 Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically ignificant vertebral fractures Osteoporos Int 16 1513 1518 (Pubitemid 41790854)
13. RD Chapurlat F Duboeuf HO Marion-Audibert 2006 Effectiveness of instant vertebral assessment to detect prevalent vertebral fracture Osteoporos Int 17 1189 1195
14. J Damiano S Kolta R Porcher 2006 Diagnosis of vertebral fractures by vertebral fracture assessment J Clin Densitom 9 66 71 (Pubitemid 43792352)
15. JT Schousboe CR Debold 2006 Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice Osteoporos Int 17 281 289 (Pubitemid 43053593)
16. HK Genant CY Wu C van Kuijk 1993 Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique J Bone Miner Res 8 1137 1148 (Pubitemid 23261108)
17. T Lang M Takada R Gee 1997 A preliminary evaluation of the lunar expert-XL for bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry J Bone Miner Res 12 136 143 (Pubitemid 27053622)
18. JA Rea P Steiger GM Blake 1998 Optimizing data acquisition and analysis of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry Osteoporos Int 8 177 183 (Pubitemid 28230442)
19. N Vallarta-Ast D Krueger N Binkley 2006 Addition of right lateral decubitus positioning improves vertebral visualization with VFA in selected patients J Clin Densitom 9 375 379 (Pubitemid 44247803)
20. PD Delmas HK Genant GG Crans 2003 Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial Bone 33 522 532 (Pubitemid 37222378)