Unpackaging synthetic biology: Identification of oversight policy problems and options

Regulation and Governance

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 92-112

  Kuzma, Jennifer ^a   Tanji, Todd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Oversight; Policy; Synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952919492     PISSN: 17485983     EISSN: 17485991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01071.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. van Aken J, Hunger I. Biosecurity Policies at International Life Science Journals. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 2009, 7:61-72.
2. Balmer A, Martin P. Synthetic Biology - Social and Ethical Challenges. 2008, Institute for Science and Society, University of Nottingham. An independent review commissioned by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), UK
3. Barben D, Fisher E, Selin C, Guston DH. Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Integration, and Deliberation. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 2008, 979-1000. Hackett E, Amsterdarnska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J. In, eds, 3rd, edn., pp., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
4. Bardach E. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving 2000, 2nd, edn., Chatham House Publishers, New York, NY
5. Synthetic Biology: A New Paradigm for Biological Discovery: Research and Markets. 2006, http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/314528, Beachhead Consulting, Last accessed 1 Jul 2009.] Available from URL:
6. Benner SA, Sismour AM. Synthetic Biology. Nature Reviews Genetics 2005, 6:533-543.
7. Berg P, Baltimore D, Brenner S. Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA Molecules. Science 1975, 185:303.
8. 2009, http://bbf.openwetware.org/, BioBricks Foundation, Last accessed 4 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
9. Breithaupt H. The Engineer's Approach to Biology. EMBO Reports 2006, 7:21-23.
10. Caruso D. Synthetic Biology - An Overview and Recommendations for Anticipating and Addressing Emerging Risks: Life Sciences, Science Progress. 2008, http://www.scienceprogress.org, [Last accessed 17 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
11. Check E. Synthetic Biologists Try to Calm Fears. Nature 2006, 441:388-389.
12. De Vriend H. Constructing Life: Early Social Reflections on the Emerging Field of Synthetic Biology: Working Document. 2006, 97, Rathenau Institute, The Hague, Royal Netherlands
13. New Directions in Synthetic Biology: A " Call for Participants" to Take Part in a Five-day Sandpit to Look for Innovative Ways to Explore Future Developments in Synthetic Biology. 2009, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and National Science Foundation, Airlie Conference Center, Warrenton, VA
14. Global Coalition Sounds the Alarm on Synthetic Biology, Demands Oversight and Societal Debate: ETC Group News Release. 2006, http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/8, ETC Group, Last accessed 5 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
15. Garfinkel M, Endy D, Epstein GL, Friedman RM. Synthetic Genomics: Options for Governance 2007, The J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD
16. Gibbs WW. Synthetic Life: Scientific American. 2004, 74-81. May 2004
17. Gibson DG, Benders GA, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Denisova EA, Baden-Tillson H, Zaveri J. Complete Chemical Synthesis, Assembly, and Cloning of a Mycoplasma Genitalium Genome. Science 2008, 319(5867):1215-1220.
18. Goodman S. NANOTECH: Companies Slow to Volunteer for EPA Data-gathering Effort: Greenwire. 2008, 16 Jul
19. Guston D, Sarewitz D. Real-time Technology Assessment. Technology in Society 2002, 24:93-109.
20. Guttman A, Thompson D. Why Deliberative Democracy? 2004, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
21. Hart P. Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Nanotechnology and Synthetic Biology. 2008, http://www.nanotechproject.org/publications/archive/synbio/, Project on Emerging Technologies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC, Last accessed 26 Feb 2010.] Available from URL:
22. Horne WS, Johnson LM, Ketas TJ, Klasse PJ, Lu M, Moore JP. Structural and Biological Mimicry of Protein Surface Recognition by A/B-Peptide Foldamers. PNAS 2009, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902663106
23. Synthetic Biology: Risks and Opportunities of an Emerging Field. 2008, http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_ConceptNote_SyntheticBiology_Final_30April.pdf, IRGC (International Risk Governance Council), IRGC, Geneva. [Last accessed 5 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
24. Kumar S, Rai A. Synthetic Biology: The Intellectual Property Puzzle. Texas Law Review 2006, 85:1745.
25. Kuzma J, Besley JC. Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 2008, 2:149-162.
26. Kuzma J, Romanchek J, Kokotovich A. Upstream Oversight Assessment for Agrifood Nanotechnology: A Case Studies Approach. Risk Analysis 2008, 28:1081-1098.
27. Kuzma J, Larson J, Najmaie P. Evaluating Oversight Systems for Emerging Technologies: A Case Study of Genetically Engineered Organisms. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2009, 37:546-586.
28. Lovley D. Cleaning Up with Genomics: Applying Molecular Biology to Bioremediation. Nature 2003, 1:35-44.
29. Luisi PL. Toward the Engineering of Minimal Living Cells. The Anatomical Record 2002, 268:208-214.
30. Luisi PL, Chiarabelli C, Stano P. From Never Born Proteins to Minimal Living Cells: Two Projects in Synthetic Biology. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 2006, 36:605-616.
31. Synthetic Biology's Commercial Roadmap. 2009, http://www.luxresearchinc.com/info/smr, Lux Biosciences Intelligence, State of the Market Reports, Lux Research. [Last accessed 5 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
32. Macoubrie J. Nanotechnology: Public Concerns, Reasoning, and Trust in Government. Public Understanding of Science 2006, 15(2):221-241.
33. Meredith D. Engineered Proteins Will Lead to " Synthetic Biology." 2003, http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2003/05/synthetic0507-print.ht, , 7 May. [Last accessed 17 Aug 2009.] Available from URL:
34. Miller S, Selgelid MJ. Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 2007, 13:523-580.
35. MIT Synthetic Biology Working Group. 2009, http://csbi.mit.edu, MIT-CSBi (Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Computational and Systems Biology), Last accessed 5 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
36. Oversight. 2009, http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=oversight, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Last accessed 17 Jul 2009.] Available from URL:
37. Genome Stitched Together by Hand. 2008, http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080124/full/news.2008.522.html, Nature News, , 24 Jan. [Last accessed 23 Apr 2008.] Available from URL:
38. Synthetic Biology: Applying Engineering to Biology. 2005, ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nest/docs/syntheticbiology_b5_eur21796_en.pdf, NEST (New and Emerging Science and Technology), Report of a NEST High-Level Expert Group. NEST, Directorate-General for Research, EU. [Last accessed 5 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
39. Synthetic Biology: A NEST Pathfinder Initiative. 2007, ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nest/docs/5-nest-synthetic-080507.pdf, NEST (New and Emerging Science and Technology), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. [Last accessed 5 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
40. Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules. Federal Register 1978, 43:60,108-60,131. NIH (National Institutes of Health)
41. Entrez Genome. 2009, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=genome, NIH (National Institutes of Health), Last accessed 6 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
42. Understanding Risk 1996, NRC (National Research Council), NRC, National Academies Press, Washington, DC
43. Genetically Modified Pest-protected Plants: Science and Regulation 2000, NRC (National Research Council), NRC, National Academies Press, Washington, DC
44. Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism 2004a, NRC (National Research Council), NRC, National Academies Press, Washington, DC
45. Seeking Security: Pathogens, Open Access, and Genome Databases 2004b, NRC (National Research Council), NRC, National Academies Press, Washington, DC
46. Proposed Framework for the Oversight of Dual Use Life Sciences Research: Strategies for Minimizing the Potential Misuse of Research Information. 2007, http://oba.od.nih.gov/biosecurity/pdf/Framework%20for%20transmittal%200807_Sept07.pdf, NSABB (National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity), NSABB, Bethesda, MD. [Last accessed 21 Aug 2009.] Available from URL:
47. O'Malley MA, Powell A, Davies JF, Calvert J. Knowledge-making Distinctions in Synthetic Biology. Bioessays 2008, 30:57-65.
48. Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology. Federal Register 1986, 51:23302. OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy)
49. Paarlberg RL. Governing the GM Crop Revolution: Policy Choices for Developing Countries: Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Paper 33. 2000, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
50. Parens E, Johnston J, Moses J. Ethical Issues in Synthetic Biology: An Overview of the Debates. Syn Bio 3 2009, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC
51. Issues in the Regulation of Genetically Engineered Plants and Animals. 2004, http://www.pewtrusts.org/, PIFB (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology), PIFB, Washington, DC. [Last accessed 31 March 2009.] Available from URL:
52. Agricultural Biotechnology: Information Disclosure: Accommodating Conflicting Interests within Public Access Norms. 2006, http://www.pewtrusts.org/, PIFB (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology), PIFB, Washington, DC. [Last accessed 28 May 2009.] Available from URL:
53. Rabino I. How European and U.S. Genetic Engineering Scientists View the Impact of Public Attention on Their Field: A Comparison. Science, Technology, and Human Values 1994, 19(1):23-46.
54. Rai A, Boyle J. Synthetic Biology: Caught between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons. PLoS Biology 2007, 5(3):e58.
55. Relman D. Working Group on Synthetic Genomics: Progress Report. Presentation for March 2006 Meeting of the NASBB. 2006, http://oba.od.nih.gov/biosecurity/nsabb_past_meetings.html, Last accessed 21 Aug 2009.] Available from URL:
56. Rincones J, Zeidler A, Grassi M, Carazzolle M, Pereira G. The Golden Bridge for Nature: The New Biology Applied to Bioplastics. Polymer Reviews 2009, 49:85-106.
57. Rodemeyer M. New Life, Old Bottles: Regulating First-generation Products of Synthetic Biology. 2009, http://www.synbioproject.org/library/publications/archive/synbio2, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC. [Last accessed 4 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
58. Pathogen Genomics. 2009, http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/Pathogens/, Sanger Institute, Last accessed 6 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
59. Shapiro E, Beneson Y. Bringing DNA Computers to Life: Scientific American. 2006, 44-51. May 2006
60. Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, Frey S, Wiek A. Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards. Risk Analysis 2007, 27(1):59-69.
61. Stephanopoulos G. Challenges in Engineering Microbes for Biofuels Production. Science 2007, 315:801-804.
62. Bibliography, Concepts, Statistics, and Links. 2009, http://www.synthetic-biology.info/, Synbiology, Last accessed 4 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
63. Information about EPA's Stewardship Program and the Firms that have Volunteered for It. Daily Environment Report. 2008, http://www.epa.gov/stewardship, The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., 134, A-1. [Last accessed 11 Jun 2009.] Available from URL:
64. Synthetic Biology: Scientific Discussion Meeting Summary: Policy Document. 2008, The Royal Society, 16/08. The Royal Society, London, UK
65. Thompson P. Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective 2007, 2nd, edn., Springer, Dordrecht
66. Tu D, Lee J, Ozdere T, Lee TJ, You L. Engineering Gene Circuits: Foundations and Applications. Nanotechnology in Biology and Medicine 2007, 363-372. Vo-Dinh T, In, ed, pp., CRC Press, Boca Raton
67. Tucker JB, Zilinskas RA. The Promise and Perils of Synthetic Biology. The New Atlantis 2006, 12:25-45.
68. Environmental Implications of Genetic Engineering. 1983, US Congress, 98th Congress, 1st Session, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight and the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology, Committee on Science and Technology. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
69. Vogel KM. Framing Biosecurity: An Alternative to the Biotech Revolution Model? Science and Public Policy 2008, 35:45-54.
70. Weiss R, Basu S, Hooshangi S, Kalmbach A, Karig D, Mehreja R. Genetic Circuit Building Blocks for Cellular Computation, Communications, and Signal Processing. Natural Computing 2003, 2:47-84.
71. Wilsdon J, Willis R. See-through Science. 2004, http://www.demos.co.uk/files/Seethroughsciencefinal.pdf, Demos, London. [Last accessed 15 Jul 2009.] Available from URL: