Introduction to the symposium issue: Nanotechnology innovation and policy-current strategies and future trajectories

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 581-586

  Shapira, Philip ^a,b   Youtie, Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80255123308     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-011-9224-9     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bennett, I., & Sarewitz, D. (2006). Too little, too late? Research policies on the societal implications of nanotechnology in the United States. Science as Culture, 15(4), 309-325.
2. Besley, J., Kramer, V., & Priest, S. (2008). Expert opinion on nano-technology: Risks, benefits, and regulation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(4), 549-558.
3. HM Government. (2010). UK nanotechnologies strategy: Small technologies, great opportunities. London: Ministerial Group on Nanotechnologies. http://webarchive. nationalarchives. gov. uk/+/interactive. bis. gov. uk/nano/.
4. Lux Research. (2004). The nanotech report: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. New York: Lux Research.
5. Lux Research. (2007). The nanotech report 2006: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. New York: Lux Research.
6. Lux Research. (2009). The recession's ripple effect on nanotech. State of the Market Report. New York (June 9).
7. NSET. (2007). The national nanotechnology initiative: Research and development leading to a revolution in technology and industry. Washington DC: Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology, Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council, Executive Office of the President.
8. PCAST. (2010). Report to the president and congress on the third assessment of the national nanotechnology initiative. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President and President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.
9. PEN. (2009). Nanotech-enabled consumer products top the 1, 000 mark. Release no. 64-09. Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
10. Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Roco, M. C., Hersam, M. C., & Mirkin, C. A. (Eds.). (2011). Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: Retrospective and outlook. Berlin: Springer.
12. Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2010). Follow the money. What was the impact of the nanotechnology funding boom of the past ten years? Nature, 468, 627-628.