Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology

Research Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 871-879

  Robinson, Douglas K R ^a   Rip, Arie ^a   Mangematin, Vincent ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b INRA University Pierre Mendes France   (France)

Author keywords

Cluster; Geographic concentration; Multilevel activities; Technological agglomeration; Technology platform

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION; TECHNOLOGICAL AGGLOMERATION; TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 34250159101     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Agrawal A., and Cockburn I. The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 (2003) 1227-1253
2. ASML, 2005. EUV lithography takes shape at ASML, Solid State Technology, December 2005. www.solidstate.com.
3. Autant-Bernard C., Massard N., and Mangematin V. Creation of high tech SMEs: the influence of local environment. Small Business Economics 26/2 (2006) 173-187
4. Avenel E., Favier A.V., Ma S., Mangematin V., and Rieu C. Diversification and hybridization in firm knowledge bases in nanotechnologies. Research Policy 36 (2007) 864-870
5. Carlile P.R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science 13 (2002) 442-455
6. Carlile P.R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science 15 (2004) 555-568
7. Delemarle, A., 2005. Beyond the super hero's myth: the genesis of the institutional entrepreneur's discourse. Working Paper. http://www.nanodistrict.org/scientific-output/.
8. Feldman M., and Ronzio C. Closing the innovative loop: moving from the laboratory to the shop floor in biotechnology manufacturing. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 13 (2001) 1-16
9. Gawer A., and Cusumano M.A. Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (2002), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
10. Mangematin, V., Rip, A., Delemarle, A., Robinson, D.K.R., 2005. The role of regional institutional entrepreneurs in the emergence of clusters in nanotechnologies. Working Paper. Available at: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/gblwpaper.
11. Peerbaye, A., 2004. La construction de l'espace génomique en France: La place des dispositifs instrumentaux. Thèse de Doctorat. École Normale Supérieure de Cachan, Cachan.
12. In: Roco M., and Bainbridge W.S. (Eds). Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (2002), NSF, Arlington, Virginia
13. Star S.L., and Griesemer J. Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Meseum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19 (1989) 387-420
14. Tatikonda M.V. An empirical study of platform and derivative product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (1999) 3-26
15. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., and Armstrong J. Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets?. Economic Inquiry 36 1 (1998) 65-86
16. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., and Armstrong J. Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science 48 1 (2002) 138-153