A different perspective on the phylogenetic relationships of the Moxostomatini (Cypriniformes: Catostomidae) based on cytochrome-b and Growth Hormone intron sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 159-167

  Clements, Mark D ^a   Bart, Henry L ^a   Hurley, David L ^b  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cytochrome b; Evolution; Growth Hormone; Incongruence; Introns; Phylogenetics

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; GROWTH HORMONE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; CYPRINIFORMES; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; INTRON; MEXICO; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CELL NUCLEUS; CYPRINIFORMES; CYTOCHROMES B; GROWTH HORMONE; INTRONS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MEXICO; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TEXAS;

CATOSTOMIDAE; CYPRINIFORMES; MOXOSTOMA; PISCES; SCARTOMYZON;

EID: 84857233410     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bailey, R.M., 1959. A New Catostomid Fish, Moxostoma (Thoburnia) atripinne, from the Green River Drainage, Kentucky and Tennessee, vol. 599. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan, pp. 1-19.
2. Bart H.L., Reneau P.C., Doosey M.H., Bell C.D. Evolutionary divergence of duplicate copies of the Growth Hormone gene in suckers (Actinopterygii: Catostomidae). International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2010, 11:1090-1102.
3. Buth, D.G. 1978. Biochemical Systematics of the Moxostomatini. Ph.D. Dissertation, Urbana, IL: Univeristy of Illinois.
4. Clements, M.D., 2008. Molecular Systematics and Biogeography of the Moxostomatini (Cypriniformes: Catostomidae), with Special Reference to Taxa in Texas and Mexico. Ph.D. Dissertation: New Orleans, LA, Tulane University.
5. Clements M.D., Bart H.L., Hurley D.L. Isolation and characterization of two distinct growth hormone cDNAs from the tetraploid smallmouth buffalofish (Ictiobus bubalus). General and Comparative Endocrinology 2004, 136(3):411-418.
6. Cummings M.P., Handley S.A., Myers D.S., Reed D.L., Rokas A., Winka K. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Systematic Biology 2003, 52(4):477-487.
7. Doosey M.H., Bart H.L., Saitoh K., Miya M. Phylogenetic relationships of catostomid fishes (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes) based on mitochondrial ND4/ND5 gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2010, 54(3):1028-1034.
8. Erixon P., Svennblad B., Britton T., Oxelman B. Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 2003, 52(5):665-673.
9. Ferris S.D., Whitt G.S. Phylogeny of tetraploid catostomid fishes based on the loss of duplicate gene expression. Systematic Zoology 1978, 27:189-206.
10. Fowler H.W. Notes on catostomid fishes. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia 1913, 6558:45-60.
11. Harris P.M., Mayden R.L. Phylogenetic relationships of major clades of Catostomidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) as inferred from mitochondrial SSU and LSU rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2001, 20(2):225-237.
12. Harris P.M., Mayden R.L., Espinosa Perez H.S., Leon F.G. Phylogenetic relationships of Moxostoma and Scartomyzon (Catostomidae) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence data. Journal of Fish Biology 2002, 61(6):1433-1452.
13. Hillis D.M., Bull J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 1993, 42(2):182-193.
14. Hubbs, C., 1930. Materials for the Revision of the Catostomid Fishes of Eastern North America. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan, pp. 1-47.
15. Jenkins, R.E., 1970. Systematic Studies of the Catostomid Fish Tribe Moxostomatini. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University.
16. Lee D.S., Gilbert C.R., Hocutt C.H., Jenkins R.E., McAllister D.E., Stauffer J.R. Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes 1980, North Carolina State Museum of Natural History.
17. Lewis P.O., Holder M.T., Holsinger K.E. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology 2005, 54(2):241-253.
18. Miller R.R. Origin and affinities of the freshwater fish fauna of western North America. American Association for the Advancement of Science Publication 1959, 51:182-222.
19. Miller R.R., Smith M.L. Origin and zoogeography of the fishes of central Mexico. The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes 1986, 487-517. John Wiley and Sons, New York. C.H. Hocutt, E.O. Wiley (Eds.).
20. Miller R.R., Minckley W.L., Norris S.M. Freshwater Fishes of Mexico 2006, University of Chicago Press, Chicaog, IL, pp. 490. first ed.
21. Nelson E.M. The comparative morphology of the Weberian apparatus of the Catostomidae and its significance in systematics. Journal of Morphology 1948, 83:225-251.
22. Nelson E.M. The opercular series of the Catostomidae. Journal of Morphology 1949, 85:559-567.
23. Oakley T.H., Phillips R.B. Phylogeny of salmonine fishes based on growth hormone introns: Atlantic (Salmo) and Pacific (Oncorhynchus) salmon are not sister taxa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1999, 11:381-393.
24. Robins R.R., Raney E.C. Studies of the catostomid fishes of the genus Moxostoma, with descriptions of two new species. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, Memoir 1956, 34327:1-56.
25. Robins R.R., Raney E.C. The systematic status of the suckers of the genus Moxostoma from Texas, New Mexico, and Mexico. Tulane Studies in Zoology 1957, 5(12):291-318.
26. Shimodaira H. Testing regions with nonsmooth boundaries via multiscale bootstrap. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2008, 138(5):1227-1241.
27. Shimodaira H., Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1999, 16:1114-1116.
28. Smith G.R. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae, freshwater fishes of North America and Asia. Systematics, Historical Ecology and North American Freshwater Fishes 1992, 778-813. Stanford University Press, Stanford. R.L. Mayden (Ed.).
29. Smith M.L., Miller R.R. The evolution of the Rio Grande basin as inferred from its fish fauna. The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes 1986, 457-485. John Wiley and Sons, New York. C.H. Hocutt, E.O. Wiley (Eds.).
30. Stamatakas A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(21):2688-2690.
31. Uyeno T., Smith G.R. Tetraploid origin of the karyotype of catostomid fishes. Science 1972, 175:644-646.
32. Walsh P.S., Metzger D.A., Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques 1991, 10(4):506-513.