Phylogenetic relationships of Moxostoma and Scartomyzon (Catostomidae) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence data

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1433-1452

  Harris, P M ^a   Mayden, R L ^b   Espinosa Perez H S ^c   Garcia De Leon F ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^d Inst Tecn de   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Catostomidae; Catostominae; Molecular phylogeny; Moxostoma; MtDNA cytochrome b; Scartomyzon

Indexed keywords

FISH; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHYLOGENY;

CATOSTOMIDAE; CATOSTOMUS; DELTISTES; ERIMYZON; HYPENTELIUM; MINYTREMA; MOXOSTOMA; SCARTOMYZON; THOBURNIA; THOBURNIA ATRIPINNIS; XYRAUCHEN;

EID: 0037003997     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb02488.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bailey, R. M., Lachner, E. A., Lindsey, C. C., Robins, C. R., Roedel, P. M., Scott, W. B. & Woods, L. P. (1960). A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States and Canada. Bethesda, MA: American Fisheries Society.
2. Bremer, K. (1988). The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
3. Bremer, K. (1994). Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.
4. Broughton, R. E., Stanley, S. E. & Durrett, R. T. (2000). Quantification of homoplasy for nucleotide transitions and transversions and a reexamination of assumptions in weighted phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 49, 617-627.
5. Buth, D. G. (1978). Biochemical systematics of the Moxostomatini (Cypriniformes, Catostomidae). Unpubl. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
6. Buth, D. G. (1979a). Genetic relationships among the torrent suckers, genus Thoburnia. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 7, 311-316.
7. Buth, D. G. (1979b). Duplicate gene expression in tetraploid fishes of the tribe Moxostomatini (Cypriniformes, Catostomidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 63B, 7-12.
8. Buth, D. G. (1980). Evolutionary genetics and systematic relationships in the catostomid genus Hypentelium. Copeia 1980, 280-290.
9. Cracraft, J. (1983). Species concepts and speciation analysis. In Current Ornithology, Vol. 1 (Johnston, R.F., ed.), pp. 159-187. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
10. Eldridge, N. & Cracraft, J. (1980). Phylogenetic Analysis and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
11. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
12. Ferris, S. D. & Whitt, G. S. (1978). Phylogeny of tetraploid catostomid fishes based on the loss of duplicate gene expression. Systematic Zoology 27, 189-206.
13. Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 95-98.
14. Harris, P. M. & Mayden, R. L. (2001). Phylogenetic relationships of major clades of Catostomidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) as inferred from mitochondrial SSU and LSU rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20, 225-237. doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.0980.
15. Hubbs, C. L. (1930). Materials for a revision of the catostomid fishes of eastern North America. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, No. 20.
16. Hubbs, C. L. & Lagler, K. F. (1958). Fishes of the Great Lakes region, rev. edn. Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bulletin 26, 1-213.
17. Jenkins, R. E. (1970). Systematic studies of the catostomid fish tribe Moxostomatini. Unpubl. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
18. Kishino, H. & Hasegawa, M. (1989). Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 31, 151-160.
19. Kumar, S. (1996). PHYLTEST: Phylogenetic Hypothesis Testing Software. Version 2.0. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
20. Lee, D. S., Gilbert, C. R., Hocutt, C. H., Jenkins, R. E., McAllister, D. E. & Stauffer, J. R. Jr (1981). Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State Museum of Natural History.
21. Legendre, V. (1942). Redecouverte apres un siecle et reclassification d'une espece de Catostomide. Naturaliste Canadien (Quebec) 69, 227-233.
22. Lydeard, C. & Roe, K. J. (1997). The phylogenetic utility of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene for inferring relationships among actinopterygian fishes. In Molecular Systematics of Fishes (Kocher, T. D. & Stepien, C. A., eds), pp. 285-303. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. Mayden, R. L. (1988). Vicariance biogeography, parsimony, and evolution in North American freshwater fishes. Systematic Zoology 37, 329-355.
24. Mayden, R. L. (1997). A hierarchy of species concepts: The denouement in the saga of the species problem. In Species: the Units of Biodiversity (Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A. & Wilson, M. R., eds), pp. 381-424. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
25. Mayden, R. L. (1999). Consilience and a hierarchy of species concepts: advances toward closure on the species puzzle. Journal of Nematology 31, 95-116.
26. Mayden, R. L., Burr, B. M., Page, L. M. & Miller, R. R. (1992). The native freshwater fishes of North America. In Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes (Mayden, R. L., ed.), pp. 827-863. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
27. McKitrick, M. C. & Zink, R. M. (1988). Species concepts in ornithology. The Condor 90, 1-14.
28. Meyer, A. (1993). Evolution of mitochondrial DNA in fishes. In Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Fishes, Vol. 2 (Hochachka, P. W. & Mommsen, T. P., eds), pp. 1-38. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. Miller, R. R. (1959). Origin and affinities of the freshwater fish fauna of western North America. In Zoogeography (Hubbs, C. L., ed.), pp. 187-222. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Publication 51.
30. Miller, R. R. & Smith, G. R. (1981). Distribution and evolution of Chasmistes (Pisces: Catostomidae) in western North America. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 696, 1-46.
31. Nelson, E. M. (1948). The comparative morphology of the Weberian apparatus of the Catostomidae and its significance in systematics. Journal of Morphology 83, 225-251.
32. Nelson, G. J. (1972). Phylogenetic relationship and classification. Systematic Zoology 21, 227-231.
33. Nelson, G. J. (1974). Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships. Systematic Zoology 22, 344-359.
34. Page, L. M. & Burr, B. M. (1991). A Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes: North America North of Mexico. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
35. Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. (1998). Modeltest: testing the models of DNA substiution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-818.
36. Rhode, F. (1998). Regional Southeastern Fishes Council Reports: Region 1 - Northeast. Proceedings of the Southeastern Fishes Council 36, 11-12.
37. Robins, C. R. & Raney, E. C. (1956). Studies of the catostomid fishes of the genus Moxostoma, with descriptions of two new species. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Memoir 343, 1-56.
38. Robins, C. R. & Raney, E. C. (1957). The systematic status of the suckers of the genus Moxostoma from Texas, New Mexico and Mexico. Tulane Studies in Zoology 5, 291-318.
39. Schmidt, T. R. & Gold, J. R. (1993). Complete sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene in the cherryfin shiner, Lythrurus roseipinnis (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Copeia 1993, 880-883.
40. Scott, W. B. & Crossman, E. J. (1973). Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Ottawa: Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
41. Seale, A. (1896). Notes on Deltistes, a new genus of catostomoid fishes. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science, Series 2 6, 269.
42. Simpson, G. G. (1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
43. Smith, G. R. (1975). Fishes of the Pliocene Glenns Ferry formation, southwest Idaho. University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology, Papers on Paleontology 14, 1-68.
44. Smith, G. R. (1992). Phylogeny and biogeography of the Catostomidae, freshwater fishes of North America and Asia. In Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes (Mayden, R. L., ed.), pp. 778-813. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
45. Smith, G. R. & Dowling, T. (2001). Resolution of incongruent morphological, molecular, and paleontological data on phylogeny of catostomid fishes. In Abstracts from the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Annual Meeting, July 5-10, 2001. State College, PN: The Pennsylvania State University.
46. Sorenson, M. D. (1996). TreeRot. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
47. Swofford, D. L. (1998). PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MASinauer Associates.
48. Warren, M. L. Jr (1992). Variation of the spotted sunfish, Lepomis punctatus complex (Centrarchidae): meristics, morphometrics, pigmentation and species limits. Bulletin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History 12, 1-47.
49. Warren, M. L. Jr, Burr, B. M., Walsh, S. J., Bart, J. H. L., Cashner, R. C., Etnier, D. A., Freeman, B. J., Kuhajda, B. R., Mayden, R. L., Robison, H. W., Ross, S. T. & Starnes, W. C. (2000). Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries 25, 7-31.
50. Wiley, E. O. (1981). Phylogenetics: the Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
51. Wiley, E. O. & Mayden, R. L. (2000). The Evolutionary Species Concept. In Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate (Wheeler, Q. D. & Meier, R., eds), pp. 70-89. New York: Columbia University Press.
52. Xiao, W., Zhang, Y. & Liu, H. (2001). Molecular systematics of Xenocyprinae (Teleostei: Cyprinidae): taxonomy, biogeography, and coevolution of a special group restricted in East Asia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18, 163-173.