Perceived risk as a moderator of the effectiveness of framed HIV-test promotion messages among women: A randomized controlled trial

Health Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 114-121

  Hull, Shawnika J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Elaboration; Gain loss frame; HIV testing; Perceived risk; Prospect theory

Indexed keywords

HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS ANTIBODY;

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO AIDS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIV TEST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEGRO; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; WOMEN'S HEALTH; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; CAUCASIAN; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; ANXIETY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INTENTION; MASS SCREENING; PERCEPTION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; RISK; WOMEN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857219565     PISSN: 02786133     EISSN: 19307810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024702     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abhyankar, P., O'Connor, D., & Lawton, R. (2008). The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss framed advantage. Psychology Health & Medicine, 13, 1-16.
2. Albarracín, D., Fishbein, M., Johnson, B. T., & Muellerleile, P. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 142-161.
3. Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D., & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22, 60-67.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. Morbidity and Morality Weekly Report, 55(RR-14). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5514a1.htm
5. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
6. Das, E. H. H. J., de Wit, J. B. F., & Stroebe, W. (2003). Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: Evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 650.
7. De Cock, M., Gilks, C. F., Lo, Y., & Guerma, T. (2009). Can antiretroviral therapy eliminate HIV transmission? The Lancet, 373, 7-9.
8. de Wit, J. B. F., Das, E., & Vet, R. (2008). What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychology, 27, 110-115.
9. Dinoff, B. L., & Kowalski, R. M. (1999). Reducing AIDS risk behavior: The combined efficacy of protection motivation theory and the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 18, 223-239.
10. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).
11. Granich, R. M., Gilks, C. F., Dye, C., De Cock, K. M., & Williams, B. G. (2009). Universal voluntary HIV testing with immediate antiretroviral therapy as a strategy for elimination of HIV transmission: A mathematical model. The Lancet, 373, 48-57.
12. Hayes, A. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Hayes, A. (2009, March 6). Statistical mediation and moderation analyses: Multiple mediated moderation [Assuming X and Y are predictors, M1 and M2 are mediators, and Z is the outcome. In that case, create a variable defined as the product of X and Y. Call this XY. Using INDIRECT, treat XY as the IV, X and Y as covariates, M1 and M2 as mediators, and Z as outcome]. Retrieved from http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=44574520333&topic=14676
14. Hornik, R. C. (2002). Public Health communication: Evidence for behavior change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Hullett, C. (2004). Using functional theory to promote sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing: The impact of value-expressive messages and guilt. Communication Research, 31, 363-396.
16. Janssen, R. S., Holtgrave, D. R., Valdiserri, R. O., Shephard, M., Gayle, H. D., & De Cock, K. M. (2001). The serostatus approach to fighting the HIV epidemic: Prevention strategies for infected individuals. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1019-1024.
17. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
18. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). HIV/AIDS Policy Fact Sheet: HIV testing in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.kff.org/hivaids/upload/6094-10.pdf
19. Kalichman, S. C., & Coley, B., (1995). Context framing to enhance HIV-antibody testing messages targeted to African American women. Health Psychology, 14, 247-254.
20. Kelly, K. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2001). Screening for health and illness: An analysis of how and when message frames impact behavioral decision-making. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
21. Latimer, A. E., Salovey, P., & Rothman, A. J. (2007). The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behavior: Is all hope lost? Journal of Health Communication, 12, 645-649.
22. Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218.
23. Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue-involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361-367.
24. Marks, G., Crepaz, N., Senterfitt, J. W., & Janssen, R. S. (2005). Metaanalysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: Implications for HIV prevention programs. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 39, 446-453.
25. Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intention, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
26. O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook, (pp. 1-43). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59, 296-316.
28. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
29. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
30. Rothman, A., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19.
31. Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, S202-S220.
32. Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P. (1999). They systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1355-1369.
33. Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K, & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 408-433.
34. Siegel, K., Raveis, V. H., & Gorey, E. (1998). Barriers and pathways to testing among HIV infected women. AIDS Education and Prevention, 10, 114-127.
35. Snyder, L. B., Hamilton, M. A., Mitchell, E. W., Kiwanuka-Tondo, J., Fleming-Milici, F., & Proctor, D. (2004). A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 71-96.
36. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.