DNA replication induces compositional biases in yeast

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 893-904

  Marsolier Kergoat, Marie Claude ^a   Goldar, Arach ^a  

^a SERVICE DE CHIMIE BIOORGANIQUE ET DE MARQUAGE   (France)

Author keywords

compositional biases; DNA replication; replication and transcription coorientation; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; yeast

Indexed keywords

ADENINE; CYTOSINE; VIRUS DNA;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPLICATION; KLUYVEROMYCES LACTIS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; VIRUS GENOME;

BASE COMPOSITION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA REPLICATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; KLUYVEROMYCES; REPLICATION ORIGIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84857198915     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr240     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Akashi H. 2003. Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. Genetics 164:1291-1303. (Pubitemid 37102197)
2. Azvolinsky A, Giresi PG, Lieb JD, Zakian VA. 2009. Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell. 34:722-734.
3. Benschop JJ, Brabers N, van Leenen D, Bakker LV, van Deutekom HW, van Berkum NL, Apweiler E, Lijnzaad P, Holstege FC, Kemmeren P. 2010. A consensus of core protein complex compositions for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell. 38:916-928.
4. Cadoret JC, Meisch F, Hassan-Zadeh V, Luyten I, Guillet C, Duret L, Quesneville H, Prioleau MN. 2008. Genome-wide studies highlight indirect links between human replication origins and gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:15837-15842.
5. Carbone A, Zinovyev A, Kepes F. 2003. Codon adaptation index as a measure of dominating codon bias. Bioinformatics 19:2005-2015. (Pubitemid 37408151)
6. Chen CL, Duquenne L, Audit B, et al. (11 co-authors). 2011. Replication-associated mutational asymmetry in the human genome. Mol Biol Evol. 28:2327-2337.
7. Coghlan A, Wolfe KH. 2000. Relationship of codon bias to mRNA concentration and protein length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 16:1131-1145.
8. David L, Huber W, Granovskaia M, Toedling J, Palm CJ, Bofkin L, Jones T, Davis RW, Steinmetz LM. 2006. A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:5320-5325.
9. Deutschbauer AM, Jaramillo DF, Proctor M, Kumm J, Hillenmeyer ME, Davis RW, Nislow C, Giaever G. 2005. Mechanisms of haploinsufficiency revealed by genome-wide profiling in yeast. Genetics 169:1915-1925. (Pubitemid 40695608)
10. Eaton ML, Galani K, Kang S, Bell SP, MacAlpine DM. 2010. Conserved nucleosome positioning defines replication origins. Genes Dev. 24:748-753.
11. Fitzpatrick DA, Logue ME, Stajich JE, Butler G. 2006. A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol Biol. 6:99.
12. Gierlik A, Kowalczuk M, Mackiewicz P, Dudek MR, Cebrat S. 2000. Is there replication-associated mutational pressure in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome? J Theor Biol. 202:305-314.
13. Green P, Ewing B, Miller W, Thomas PJ, Green ED. 2003. Transcription-associated mutational asymmetry in mammalian evolution. Nat Genet. 33:514-517. (Pubitemid 36390015)
14. Grigoriev A. 1998. Analyzing genomes with cumulative skew diagrams. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:2286-2290. (Pubitemid 28297325)
15. Hedges SB. 2002. The origin and evolution of model organisms. Nat Rev Genet. 3:838-849. (Pubitemid 35303516)
16. Heichinger C, Penkett CJ, Bahler J, Nurse P. 2006. Genome-wide characterization of fission yeast DNA replication origins. EMBO J. 25:5171-5179. (Pubitemid 44658534)
17. Huberman JA, Riggs AD. 1968. On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes. J Mol Biol. 32:327-341.
18. Huvet M, Nicolay S, Touchon M, Audit B, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Arneodo A, Thermes C. 2007. Human gene organization driven by the coordination of replication and transcription. Genome Res. 17:1278-1285. (Pubitemid 47360902)
19. Jorgensen FG, Schierup MH. 2009. Increased rate of human mutations where DNA and RNA polymerases collide. Trends Genet. 25:523-527.
20. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES. 2003. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423:241-254. (Pubitemid 40852689)
21. Kunkel TA, Burgers PM. 2008. Dividing the workload at a eukaryotic replication fork. Trends Cell Biol. 18:521-527.
22. Lantermann AB, Straub T, Stralfors A, Yuan GC, Ekwall K, Korber P. 2010. Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome-wide nucleosome mapping reveals positioning mechanisms distinct from those of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 17:251-257.
23. Larrea AA, Lujan SA, Nick McElhinny SA, Mieczkowski PA, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA, Kunkel TA. 2010. Genome-wide model for the normal eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:17674-17679.
24. Liachko I, Bhaskar A, Lee C, Chung SC, Tye BK, Keich U. 2010. A comprehensive genome-wide map of autonomously replicating sequences in a naive genome. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000946.
25. Lobry JR. 1995. Properties of a general model of DNA evolution under no-strand-bias conditions. J Mol Evol. 40:326-330.
26. Lobry JR. 1996a. Asymmetric substitution patterns in the two DNA strands of bacteria. Mol Biol Evol. 13:660-665. (Pubitemid 26131887)
27. Lobry JR. 1996b. Origin of replication of Mycoplasma genitalium. Science 272:745-746. (Pubitemid 26160056)
28. McLean MJ, Wolfe KH, Devine KM. 1998. Base composition skews, replication orientation, and gene orientation in 12 prokaryote genomes. J Mol Evol. 47:691-696. (Pubitemid 29008772)
29. Mrazek J, Karlin S. 1998. Strand compositional asymmetry in bacterial and large viral genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:3720-3725. (Pubitemid 128616235)
30. Necsulea A, Guillet C, Cadoret JC, Prioleau MN, Duret L. 2009. The relationship between DNA replication and human genome organization. Mol Biol Evol. 26:729-741.
31. Nieduszynski CA, Hiraga S, Ak P, Benham CJ, Donaldson AD. 2007. OriDB: a DNA replication origin database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:D40-D46. (Pubitemid 46056167)
32. Nieduszynski CA, Knox Y, Donaldson AD. 2006. Genome-wide identification of replication origins in yeast by comparative genomics. Genes Dev. 20:1874-1879. (Pubitemid 44079324)
33. Pavlov YI, Mian IM, Kunkel TA. 2003. Evidence for preferential mismatch repair of lagging strand DNA replication errors in yeast. Curr Biol. 13:744-748. (Pubitemid 36531021)
34. Pavlov YI, Newlon CS, Kunkel TA. 2002. Yeast origins establish a strand bias for replicational mutagenesis. Mol Cell. 10: 207-213. (Pubitemid 34876573)
35. Prado F, Aguilera A. 2005. Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription-associated recombination. Embo J. 24:1267-1276. (Pubitemid 40516609)
36. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
37. Raghuraman MK, Winzeler EA, Collingwood D, Hunt S, Wodicka L, Conway A, Lockhart DJ, Davis RW, Brewer BJ, Fangman WL. 2001. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294:115-121. (Pubitemid 32952958)
38. Rhind N. 2006. DNA replication timing: random thoughts about origin firing. Nat Cell Biol. 8:1313-1316. (Pubitemid 44835102)
39. Rhind N, Yang SC, Bechhoefer J. 2010. Reconciling stochastic origin firing with defined replication timing. Chromosome Res. 18:35-43.
40. Roberts JD, Izuta S, Thomas DC, Kunkel TA. 1994. Mispair-, site-, and strand-specific error rates during simian virus 40 origindependent replication in vitro with excess deoxythymidine triphosphate. J Biol Chem. 269:1711-1717. (Pubitemid 24035365)
41. Rocha EP. 2004. The replication-related organization of bacterial genomes. Microbiology 150:1609-1627. (Pubitemid 38923661)
42. Rocha EP, Danchin A. 2003a. Essentiality, not expressiveness, drives gene-strand bias in bacteria. Nat Genet. 34:377-378. (Pubitemid 36935329)
43. Rocha EP, Danchin A. 2003b. Gene essentiality determines chromosome organisation in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 6570-6577. (Pubitemid 37508762)
44. Rocha EP, Touchon M, Feil EJ. 2006. Similar compositional biases are caused by very different mutational effects. Genome Res. 16:1537-1547. (Pubitemid 44878492)
45. Sharp PM, Li WH. 1987. The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:1281-1295.
46. Sueoka N. 1995. Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol. 40:318-325.
47. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680. (Pubitemid 24354800)
48. Touchon M, Nicolay S, Arneodo A, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Thermes C. 2003. Transcription-coupled TA and GC strand asymmetries in the human genome. FEBS Lett. 555:579-582. (Pubitemid 37532614)
49. Touchon M, Nicolay S, Audit B, Brodie of Brodie EB, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Arneodo A, Thermes C. 2005. Replication-associated strand asymmetries in mammalian genomes: toward detection of replication origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:9836-9841. (Pubitemid 40993654)
50. Wang Y, Liu CL, Storey JD, Tibshirani RJ, Herschlag D, Brown PO. 2002. Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:5860-5865. (Pubitemid 34493230)
51. Yabuki N, Terashima H, Kitada K. 2002. Mapping of early firing origins on a replication profile of budding yeast. Genes Cells. 7:781-789. (Pubitemid 34947082)