Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome-wide nucleosome mapping reveals positioning mechanisms distinct from those of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 251-257

  Lantermann, Alexandra B ^a   Straub, Tobias ^a   Strålfors, Annelie ^b   Yuan, Guo Cheng ^c,d   Ekwall, Karl ^b   Korber, Philipp ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NUCLEOSOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; NUCLEOSOMES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

EID: 76349103252     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1741     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Jiang, C. & Pugh, B.F. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 161-172 (2009).
2. Radman-Livaja, M. & Rando, O.J. Nucleosome positioning: how is it established, and why does it matter? Dev. Biol. published online (13 June 2009).
3. Segal, E. & Widom, J. What controls nucleosome positions? Trends Genet. 25, 335-343 (2009).
4. Yuan, G.C., et al. Genome-scale identifcation of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309, 626-630 (2005).
5. Lee, W., et al. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat. Genet. 39, 1235-1244 (2007).
6. Whitehouse, I., Rando, O.J., Delrow, J. & Tsukiyama, T. Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature 450, 1031-1035 (2007).
7. Shivaswamy, S., et al. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol. 6, e65 (2008).
8. Field, Y., et al. Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000216 (2008).
9. Mavrich, T.N., et al. Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome. Nature 453, 358-362 (2008).
10. Schones, D.E., et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132, 887-898 (2008).
11. Valouev, A., et al. A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. Genome Res. 18, 1051-1063 (2008).
12. Mavrich, T.N., et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res. 18, 1073-1083 (2008).
13. Field, Y., et al. Gene expression divergence in yeast is coupled to evolution of DNA-encoded nucleosome organization. Nat. Genet. 41, 438-445 (2009).
14. Segal, E., et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442, 772-778 (2006).
15. Ioshikhes, I.P., Albert, I., Zanton, S.J. & Pugh, B.F. Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nat. Genet. 38, 1210-1215 (2006).
16. Yuan, G.C. & Liu, J.S. Genomic sequence is highly predictive of local nucleosome depletion. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e13 (2008).
17. Kaplan, N., et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458, 362-366 (2009).
18. Peckham, H.E., et al. Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA. Genome Res. 17, 1170-1177 (2007).
19. Badis, G., et al. A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol. Cell 32, 878-887 (2008).
20. Parnell, T.J., Huff, J.T. & Cairns, B.R. RSC regulates nucleosome positioning at Pol II genes and density at Pol III genes. EMBO J. 27, 100-110 (2008).
21. Gupta, S., et al. Predicting human nucleosome occupancy from primary sequence. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000134 (2008).
22. Zhang, Y., et al. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 847-852 (2009).
23. Hartley, P.D. & Madhani, H.D. Mechanisms that specify promoter nucleosome location and identity. Cell 137, 445-458 (2009).
24. Drew, H.R. & Travers, A.A. DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 186, 773-790 (1985).
25. Sekinger, E.A., Moqtaderi, Z. & Struhl, K. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. Mol. Cell 18, 735-748 (2005).
26. Wippo, C.J., et al. Differential cofactor requirements for histone eviction from two nucleosomes at the yeast PHO84 promoter are determined by intrinsic nucleosome stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 2960-2981 (2009).
27. Korber, P. & Hörz, W. In vitro assembly of the characteristic chromatin organization at the yeast PHO5 promoter by a replication-independent extract system. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 35113-35120 (2004).
28. Hertel, C.B., Langst, G., Hörz, W. & Korber, P. Nucleosome stability at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters correlates with differential cofactor requirements for chromatin opening. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 10755-10767 (2005).
29. McManus, J., et al. Unusual chromosome structure of fssion yeast DNA in mouse cells. J. Cell Sci. 107, 469-486 (1994).
30. Bernardi, F., Zatchej, M. & Thoma, F. Species specifc protein-DNA interactions may determine the chromatin units of genes in S. cerevisiae and in S. pombe. EMBO J. 11, 1177-1185 (1992).
31. Lantermann, A., Stralfors, A., Fagerstrom-Billai, F., Korber, P. & Ekwall, K. Genome-wide mapping of nucleosome positions in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods 48, 218-225 (2009).
32. Dutrow, N., et al. Dynamic transcriptome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe shown by RNA-DNA hybrid mapping. Nat. Genet. 40, 977-986 (2008).
33. Godde, J.S. & Widom, J. Chromatin structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. A nucleosome repeat length that is shorter than the chromatosomal DNA length. J. Mol. Biol. 226, 1009-1025 (1992).
34. Bernardi, F., Koller, T. & Thoma, F. The ade6 gene of the fssion yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has the same chromatin structure in the chromosome and in plasmids. Yeast 7, 547-558 (1991).
35. Thomas, J.O. & Furber, V. Yeast chromatin structure. FEBS Lett. 66, 274-280 (1976).
36. Lee, C.K., Shibata, Y., Rao, B., Strahl, B.D. & Lieb, J.D. Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide. Nat. Genet. 36, 900-905 (2004).
37. Bernstein, B.E., Liu, C.L., Humphrey, E.L., Perlstein, E.O. & Schreiber, S.L. Global nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Genome Biol. 5, R62 (2004).
38. Wirén, M., et al. Genomewide analysis of nucleosome density histone acetylation and HDAC function in fssion yeast. EMBO J. 24, 2906-2918 (2005).
39. Heichinger, C., Penkett, C.J., Bahler, J. & Nurse, P. Genome-wide characterization of fssion yeast DNA replication origins. EMBO J. 25, 5171-5179 (2006).
40. Fagerström-Billai, F., Durand-Dubief, M., Ekwall, K. & Wright, A.P. Individual subunits of the Ssn6-Tup11/12 corepressor are selectively required for repression of different target genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 1069-1082 (2007).
41. Malavé, T.M. & Dent, S.Y. Transcriptional repression by Tup1-Ssn6. Biochem. Cell Biol. 84, 437-443 (2006).
42. Ponomarenko, J.V., et al. Conformational and physicochemical DNA features specifc for transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics 15, 654-668 (1999).
43. Kornberg, R.D. & Stryer, L. Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 6677-6690 (1988).
44. Guillemette, B., et al. Variant histone H2A.Z is globally localized to the promoters of inactive yeast genes and regulates nucleosome positioning. PLoS Biol. 3, e384 (2005).
45. Buchanan, L., et al. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Jmjc-protein, Msc1, prevents H2A.Z localization in centromeric and subtelomeric chromatin domains. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000726 (2009).
46. Zofall, M., et al. Histone H2A.Z cooperates with RNAi and heterochromatin factors to suppress antisense RNAs. Nature 461, 419-422 (2009).
47. Varga-Weisz, P.D., et al. Chromatin-remodelling factor CHRAC contains the ATPases ISWI and topoisomerase II. Nature 388, 598-602 (1997).
48. Flaus, A., Martin, D.M., Barton, G.J. & Owen-Hughes, T. Identifcation of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 2887-2905 (2006).
49. Sugiyama, T., et al. SHREC, an effector complex for heterochromatic transcriptional silencing. Cell 128, 491-504 (2007).
50. Cam, H.P., et al. Comprehensive analysis of heterochromatin-and RNAi-mediated epigenetic control of the fssion yeast genome. Nat. Genet. 37, 809-819 (2005).
51. Johnsson, A., et al. HAT-HDAC interplay modulates global histone H3K14 acetylation in gene-coding regions during stress. EMBO Rep. 10, 1009-1014 (2009).
52. Svaren, J., Venter, U. & Hörz, W. In vivo analysis of nucleosome structure and transcription factor binding in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol. Genet. 6, 153-167 (1995).
53. Huber, W., von Heydebreck, A., Sultmann, H., Poustka, A. & Vingron, M. Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantifcation of differential expression. Bioinformatics 18 (Suppl. 1), S96-S104 (2002).
54. Wilhelm, B.T., et al. Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution. Nature 453, 1239-1243 (2008).
55. David, L., et al. A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5320-5325 (2006).
56. Yuan, G.C. Targeted recruitment of histone modifcations in humans predicted by genomic sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 16, 341-355 (2009).