Early Clinical Results of a High-Flexion, Posterior-Stabilized, Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty. A US Investigational Device Exemption Trial.

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 421-429

  Scuderi, Giles R ^a   Hedden, David R ^b   Maltry, John A ^c   Traina, Steven M ^d   Sheinkop, Mitchell B ^e   Hartzband, Mark A ^f  

^a Insall Scott Kelly Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^c Tucson Orthopaedic Institute   (United States)

^d Western Orthopaedics   (United States)

^e RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f Hartzband Center for Hip and Knee Replacement   (United States)

Author keywords

High flexion mobile bearing and fixed bearing knees; Investigational device exemption trial; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FIXED BEARING KNEE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE SOCIETY ASSESSMENT AND FUNCTION SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILE BEARING KNEE; ORTHOPEDICS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84857117760     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Long W.J., Scuderi G.R. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(7 Suppl):6.
2. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Scuderi G.R., et al. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 464:53.
3. Gupta S.K., Ranawat A.S., Shah V., et al. The P.F.C. sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: a matched-pair study. Orthopedics 2006, 29(9 Suppl):S49.
4. Kim Y.H., Sohn K.S., Kim J.S. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:1470.
5. Seon J.K., Song E.K., Lee J.Y. Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005, 28(10 Suppl):s1247.
6. Bin S.I., Nam T.S. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007, 15:350.
7. Huang H.T., Su J.Y., Wang G.J. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:674.
8. Kim T.H., Lee D.H., Bin S.I. The NexGen LPS-flex to the knee prosthesis at a minimum of three years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1304.
9. Ng F.Y., Wong H.L., Yau W.P., et al. Comparison of range of motion after standard and high-flexion posterior stabilised total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2008, 32:795.
10. Nutton R.W., van der Linden M.L., Rowe P.J., et al. A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:37.
11. Argenson J.N., Parratte S., Ashour A., et al. Patient-reported outcome correlates with knee function after a single-design mobile-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:2669.
12. Tarabichi S., Tarabichi Y., Hawari M. Achieving deep flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25:219.
13. Wohlrab D., Hube R., Zeh A., et al. Clinical and radiological results of high flex total knee arthroplasty: a 5 year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009, 129:21.
14. Jones V.C., Barton D.C., Fitzpatrick D.P., et al. An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees: the influence of design and kinematics. Biomed Mater Eng 1999, 9:189.
15. Oh K.J., Pandher D.S., Lee S.H., et al. Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:873.
16. Smith T.O., Ejtehadi F., Nichols R., et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010, 18:325.
17. Gandhi R., Tso P., Davey J.R., et al. High-flexion implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee 2009, 16:14.
18. Murphy M., Journeaux S., Russell T. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 2009, 33:887.
19. Argenson J.N., Scuderi G.R., Komistek R.D., et al. In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2005, 38:277.
20. Nakamura E., Banks S.A., Tanaka A., et al. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics during deep flexion kneeling in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:1120.
21. Anouchi Y.S., McShane M., Kelly F., et al. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 87.
22. Ritter M.A., Harty L.D., Davis K.E., et al. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A:1278.
23. Chiu K.Y., Ng T.P., Tang W.M., et al. Review article: knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2002, 10:194.
24. Brassard M.F., Insall J.N., Scuderi G.R., et al. Does modularity affect clinical success? A comparison with a minimum 10-year follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 26.
25. Ecker M.L., Lotke P.A., Windsor R.E., et al. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987, 151.
26. Fuchs R., Mills E.L., Clarke H.D., et al. A third-generation, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis: early results after follow-up of 2 to 6 years. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:821.
27. Guha A.R., Debnath U.K., Graham N.M. Radiolucent lines below the tibial component of a total knee replacement (TKR)-a comparison between single-and two-stage cementation techniques. Int Orthop 2008, 32:453.
28. Hartford J.M., Hunt T., Kaufer H. Low contact stress mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: results at 5 to 13 years. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:977.
29. Magee F.P., Weinstein A.M. The effect of position on the detection of radiolucent lines beneath the tibial tray. Transactions 1986, 357.
30. Rodricks D.J., Patil S., Pulido P., et al. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:89.
31. Zaki S.H., Rafiq I., Kapoor A., et al. Medium-term results with the Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma knee prosthesis. The Wrightington experience. Acta Orthop Belg 2007, 73:55.
32. Kim Y.H., Yoon S.H., Kim J.S. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1317.
33. Sorrells R.B., Stiehl J.B., Voorhorst P.E. Midterm results of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 182.
34. Rubinstein R.A., DeHaan A. The incidence and results of manipulation after primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2010, 17:29.
35. Sharma V., Maheshwari A.V., Tsailas P.G., et al. The results of knee manipulation for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty with or without an intra-articular steroid injection. Indian J Orthop 2008, 42:314.
36. Bradbury N., Borton D., Spoo G., et al. Participation in sports after total knee replacement. Am J Sports Med 1998, 26:530.
37. Healy W.L., Iorio R., Lemos M.J. Athletic activity after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 65.
38. Hemmerich A., Brown H., Smith S., et al. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living. J Orthop Res 2006, 24:770.
39. Weiss J.M., Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., et al. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 172.