Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 770-781

  Hemmerich, A ^a   Brown, H ^a   Smith, S ^a   Marthandam, S S K ^b   Wyss, U P ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b SRI RAMACHANDRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Ankle; Hip; Knee; Range of motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANKLE; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOOT; HIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDIAN; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEELING; LEG; MALE; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACRUM; SITTING; SQUATTING; THIGH; BIOMECHANICS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ANKLE JOINT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 33646193989     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20114     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Costigan PA, Deluzio KJ, Wyss UP. 2002. Knee and hip kinetics during normal stair climbing. Gait Posture 16: 31-37.
2. Menke W, Schmitz B, Salm S. 1992. Range of motion after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111:280-281.
3. Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, et al. 2000. Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture 12:143-155.
4. Tew M, Forster IW, Wallace WA. 1989. Effect of total knee arthroplasty on maximal flexion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 247:168-174.
5. Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, et al. 2002. Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplasty 17:59-62.
6. Hefzy MS, Kelly BP, Cooke TD. 1998. Kinematics of the knee joint in deep flexion: a radiographic assessment. Med Eng Phys 20:302-307.
7. Kanekasu K, Banks SA, Honjo S, et al. 2004. Fluoroscopic analysis of knee arthroplasty kinematics during deep flexion kneeling. J Arthroplasty 19:998-1003.
8. Shoji H, Yoshino S, Komagamine M. 1987. Improved range of motion with the Y/S total knee arthroplasty system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 218:150-163.
9. Yamazaki J, Ishigami S, Nagashima M, et al. 2002. Hy-Flex II total knee system and range of motion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:156-160.
10. Yoshino S, Nakamura H, Shiga H, et al. 1997. Recovery of full flexion after total knee replacement in rheumatoid arthritis - a follow-up study. Int Orthop 21:98-100.
11. Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP. 2001. Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 24:191-198.
12. Villar RN, Solomon VK, Rangam J. 1989. Knee surgery and the Indian knee. The importance of the preservation of flexion. Trop Doct 19:21-24.
13. Das De S, Balasubramaniam P, Bose K. 1994. Squatting posture in Asians and development of the inferior hip sourcil. J Orthop Surg 2:33-37.
14. Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, et al. 2002. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:172-188.
15. Ritter MA, Campbell ED. 1987. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:95-97.
16. Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ, et al. 2002. Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 20:881-886.
17. Flanagan S, Salem GJ, Wang MY, et al. 2003. Squatting exercises in older adults: kinematic and kinetic comparisons. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:635-643.
18. Ahlberg A, Moussa M, Al Nahdi M. 1988. On geographical variations in the normal range of joint motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 234:229-231.
19. Grood ES, Suntay WJ. 1983. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of 3-dimensional motions - application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136-144.
20. Kirkwood RN, Culham EG, Costigan P. 1999. Radiographic and non-invasive determination of the hip joint center location: effect on hip joint moments. Clin Biomech 14:227-235.
21. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD. 1987. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:873-880.
22. Singh U, Wason SS. 1988. Multiaxial orthotic hip joint for squatting and cross-legged sitting with hip-knee-ankle-foot-orthosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 12:101-102.
23. Li G, Zayontz S, DeFrate LE, et al. 2004. Kinematics of the knee at high flexion angles: an in vitro investigation. J Orthop Res 22:90-95.
24. Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, et al. 2000. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1199-1200.
25. Akagi M, Nakamura T, Matsusue Y, et al. 2000. The Bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion. Four-to-nine-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82A:1626-1633.
26. Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, et al. 1998. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1410-1420.
27. Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A. 2003. Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses. Three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A:1321-1329.
28. Wood PL, Deakin S. 2003. Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:334-341.
29. Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM, et al. 1997. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech 30:729-732.
30. Stagni R, Fantozzi S, Cappello A, et al. 2005. Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects. Clin Biomech 20:320-329.
31. Manal K, McClay I, Stanhope S, et al. 2000. Comparison of surface mounted markers and attachment methods in estimating tibial rotations during walking: an in vivo study. Gait Posture 11:38-45.
32. Holden JP, Orsini JA, Siegel KL, et al. 1997. Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait. Gait Posture 5:217-227.
33. Piazza SJ, Cavanagh PR. 2000. Measurement of the screw-home motion of the knee is sensitive to errors in axis alignment. J Biomech 33:1029-1034.