The NexGen LPS-flex to the knee prosthesis at a minimum of three years

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1304-1310

  Kim, T H ^a,b   Lee, D H ^a,c   Bin, S I ^a,d  

^a Asan Medical Center   (South Korea)

^b Cheong ju St Mary's Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFECTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 53849148920     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B10.21050     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F Jr, Elting J, Stiehl J. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1996;331:87-92.
2. Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, Nutton R. Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture 2000;12:143-55.
3. Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP. Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 2001;24:191-8.
4. Park KK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Seong SC, Kim TK. Correlation of maximum flexion with clinical outcome after total knee replacement in Asian patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:604-8.
5. Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, et al. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop 2002;404:172-88.
6. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, et al. A high flexion total knee arthroplasty design replicates healthy knee motion. Clin Orthop 2004;428:174-9.
7. Li G, Most E, Sultan PG, et al. Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabi-lized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1721-9.
8. Ranawat CS. Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR. Clin Orthop 2003;416:174-6.
9. Ritter MA. High-flexion knee designs: more hype than hope?: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(Suppl 1):40-1.
10. Han HS, Kang SB, Yoon KS. High incidence of loosening of the femoral component in legacy posterior stabilised-flex total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1457-61.
11. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rat-ing system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-14.
12. Waters TS, Bentley G. Patelar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:212-17.
13. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:9-12.
14. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. Third ed. Boston: Blackwell Scientific, 1994.
15. Bin SI, Nam TS. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:350-5.
16. Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:674-9.
17. Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:1470-5.
18. Nutton RW, van der Linden ML, Rowe PJ, Gaston P, Wade FA. A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:37-42.
19. Laskin RS. The effect of a high-flex implant on postoperative flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2007;30(Suppl):86-8.
20. Seon JK, Song EK, Lee JY. Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthe-sis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005;28(Suppl):1247-50.
21. Insall JN, Hood RW, Flawn LB, Sullivan DJ. The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis: a five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1983;65-A:619-28.
22. McAuley JP, Harrer MF, Ammeen D, Engh GA. Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion. Clin Orthop 2002;404:203-7.
23. Myles CM, Rowe PJ, Walker CR, Nutton RW. Knee joint functional range of movement prior to and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture 2002;16:46-54.
24. Epinette JA, Manley MT. Hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: clinical experience at 10 to 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:34-8.
25. Tai CC, Cross MJ. Five- to 12-year follow-up of a hydroxyapatite-coated cementless total knee replacement in young, active patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:1158-63.
26. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker H, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty: influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:50-3.
27. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CE Jr, et al. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop 1998;356:47-57.
28. Argenson JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, et al. In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2005;38:277-84.
29. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, Li G, Rubash HE. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop 2003;416:167-73.
30. Kawamura H, Bourne RB. Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2001;6:248-52.
31. Lizaur A, Marco L, Cebrian R. Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997;79-B:626-9.
32. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:1278-85.
33. Gupta SK, Ranawat AS, Shah V, et al. The P.F.C. sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: a matched-pair study. Orthopedics 2006;29:49-52.
34. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;392:315-18.
35. Cameron HU, Fedorkow DM. Review of a failed knee replacement and some observations on the design of a knee resurfacing prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1980;97:87-9.
36. Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Grimm K, Mehle S, Scheltema K. Why are total knee replacements revised?: analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop 2004;428:100-6.
37. Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1977;59-A:77-9.
38. Coggon D, Croft P, Kellingray S, et al. Occupational physical activities and osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:1443-9.
39. Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP. Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 2002;20:881-6.
40. Thambyah A, Goh JC, De SD. Contact stresses in the knee joint in deep flexion. Med Eng Phys 2005;27:329-35.
41. Zhang Y, Hunter DJ, Nevitt MC, et al. Association of squatting with increased prevalence of radiographic tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis: the Beijing Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1187-92.
42. Hanson GR, Park SE, Suggs JF, et al. In vivo kneeling biomechanics after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 2007;12:476-83.
43. Sharma A, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Cates HE Jr. High-flexion TKA designs: what are their in vivo contact mechanics? Clin Orthop 2007;464:117-26.
44. Suggs JF, Hanson GR, Park SE, Moynihan AL, Li G. Patient function after a posterior stabilizing total knee arthroplasty: cam-post engagement and knee kinematics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008;16:290-6.