High-Flexion Total Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 23, Issue 7 SUPPL., 2008, Pages 6-10

  Long, William J ^a   Scuderi, Giles R ^a  

^a Insall Scott Kelly Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

High flexion total knee; Primary total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMUR CONDYLE; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION CARE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 52049086064     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.024     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ritter M.A., Harty L.D., Davis K.E., et al. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (2003) 1278
2. Mulholland S.J., and Wyss U.P. Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 24 (2001) 191
3. Rowe P.J., Myles C.M., Walker C., et al. Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life. Gait Posture. 12 (2000) 143
4. Dahm D.L., Barnes S.A., Harrington J.R., et al. Patient-reported activity level after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 23 (2008) 401
5. Lizaur A., Marco L., and Cebrian R. Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 (1997) 626
6. Rowe P.J., Myles C.M., and Nutton R. The effect of total knee arthroplasty on joint movement during functional activities and joint range of motion with particular regard to higher flexion users. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 13 (2005) 131
7. Fisher D.A., Dierckman B., Watts M.R., et al. Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22 6 Suppl 2 (2007) 39
8. de Beer J., Petruccelli D., Gandhi R., et al. Primary total knee arthroplasty in patients receiving workers' compensation benefits. Can J Surg. 48 (2005) 100
9. Argenson J.N., Scuderi G.R., Komistek R.D., et al. In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech. 38 (2005) 277
10. Li G., Most E., Sultan P.G., et al. Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2004) 1721
11. Goldstein W.M., Raab D.J., Gleason T.F., et al. Why posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting total knee replacements have similar ranges of motion. The importance of posterior condylar offset and cleanout of posterior condylar space. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 Suppl 4 (2006) 182
12. Massin P., and Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope, and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 889
13. Sharma A., Komistek R.D., Scuderi G.R., et al. High-flexion TKA designs: what are their in vivo contact mechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464 (2007) 117
14. Most E., Sultan P.G., Park S.E., et al. Tibiofemoral contact behavior is improved in high-flexion cruciate retaining TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 452 (2006) 59
15. Sharma A., Leszko F., Komistek R.D., et al. In vivo patellofemoral forces in high flexion total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech. 41 (2008) 642
16. Nicholls R.L., Schirm A.C., Jeffcote B.O., et al. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro. J Orthop Res. 25 (2007) 1506
17. Harato K., Bourne R.B., Victor J., et al. Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus -substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee (2008)
18. Yoshiya S., Matsui N., Komistek R.D., et al. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions. J Arthroplasty 20 (2005) 777
19. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Scuderi G.R., et al. Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 464 (2007) 53
20. Boldt J.G., Stiehl J.B., Hodler J., et al. Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 30 (2006) 420
21. Insall J.N., Scuderi G.R., Komistek R.D., et al. Correlation between condylar liftoff and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2002) 143
22. Bengs B.C., and Scott R.D. The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 21 (2006) 650
23. Mihalko W., Fishkin Z., and Krackow K. Patellofemoral overstuff and its relationship to flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 449 (2006) 283
24. Walker P.S., and Garg A. Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. A computer analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1991) 227
25. Figgie III H.E., Goldberg V.M., Heiple K.G., et al. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68 (1986) 1035
26. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Colwell Jr. C.E., et al. In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1998) 47
27. Shoji H., Solomonow M., Yoshino S., et al. Factors affecting postoperative flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 13 (1990) 643
28. Minns Lowe C.J., Barker K.L., Dewey M., et al. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise after knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 335 (2007) 812
29. Meneghini R.M., Pierson J.L., Bagsby D., et al. Is there a functional benefit to obtaining high flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22 6 Suppl 2 (2007) 43
30. Huang H.T., Su J.Y., and Wang G.J. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 20 (2005) 674
31. Ritter M.A., Lutgring J.D., Davis K.E., et al. The effect of postoperative range of motion on functional activities after posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 (2008) 777
32. Gupta S.K., Ranawat A.S., Shah V., et al. The P.F.C. sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: a matched-pair study. Orthopedics 29 9 Suppl (2006) S49
33. Bin S.I., and Nam T.S. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15 (2007) 350
34. Nutton R.W., van der Linden M.L., Rowe P.J., et al. A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90 (2008) 37
35. Kim Y.H., Sohn K.G., and Kim J.S. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilised total knee prostheses: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A (2005) 1470