Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty: Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 89-95

  Rodricks, David J ^a   Patil, Shantanu ^a   Pulido, Pamela ^a   Colwell, Clifford W ^a  

^a SCRIPPS CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SCORING SYSTEM; SHELF LIFE; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 33846069722     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00492     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Tooma GS, Kobs JK, Thomason HC III, Kelley SS. Results of knee arthroplasty using the cemented press-fit condylar prosthesis. Based on a preliminary report. Am J Orthop. 1995;24:831-4.
2. Martin SD, McManus JL, Scott RD, Thornhill TS. Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. 5- to 9-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12: 603-14.
3. Wright RJ, Lima J, Scott RD, Thornhill TS. Two- to four-year results of posterior cruciate-sparing condylar total knee arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:80-6.
4. Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Gregg PJ. Survival analysis of cemented Press-Fit Condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:161-7.
5. Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Morris RW, Gregg PJ. A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Ten-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:658-66.
6. Schai PA, Thornhill TS, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. Results at a minimum often years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:850-8.
7. McCaskie AW, Deehan DJ, Green TP, Lock KR, Thompson JR, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Randomised, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement: results of press-fit condylar total knee replacement at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:971-5.
8. Mikulak SA, Mahoney OM, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:398-403.
9. Buehler KO, Venn-Watson E, D'Lima DD, Colwell CW Jr. The press-fit condylar total knee system: 8- to 10-year results with a posterior cruciate-retaining design. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:698-701.
10. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:94-102.
11. Scott RD, Volatile TB. Twelve years' experience with posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;205: 100-7.
12. Vince KG, Insall JN, Kelly MA. The total condylar prosthesis. 10- to 12-year results of a cemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71: 793-7.
13. Weir DJ, Moran CG, Pinder IM. Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplasty. 14-year survivorship analysis of 208 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:907-11.
14. Dennis DA, Clayton ML, O'Donnell S, Mack RP, Stringer EA. Posterior cruciate condylartotal knee arthroplasty. Average 11-year follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;281:168-76.
15. Ranawat CS, Luessenhop CP, Rodriguez JA. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system. Four-to-six-year results with a posterior-cruciate- substituting design. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:342-8.
16. King PJ, Malin AS, Scott RD, Thornhill TS. The fate of patients not returning for follow-up five years after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:897-901.
17. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-4.
18. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9-12.
19. Archibeck MJ, White RE Jr. What's new in adult reconstructive knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1404-11.
20. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C. Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:697-704.
21. Lombardi AV Jr, Engh GA, Volz RG, Albrigo JL, Brainard BJ. Fracture/dissociation of the polyethylene in metal-backed patellar components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:675-9.
22. Fehring TK, Murphy JA, Hayes TD, Roberts DW, Pomeroy DL, Griffin WL. Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:40-50.
23. Ritter MA, Thong AE, Davis KE, Berend ME, Meding JB, Paris PM. Long-term deterioration of joint evaluation scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86: 438-42.
24. Bayley JC, Scott RD, Ewald FC, Holmes GB Jr. Failure of the metal-backed patellar component after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:668-74.
25. Hofmann AA, Helthoff SM, Camargo M. Cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients 50 years or younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:102-7.
26. Duffy GP, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ. Total knee arthroplasty in patients 55 years old or younger. 10- to 17-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 356:22-7.
27. Pagnano MW, McLamb LA, Trousdale RT. Total knee arthroplasty for patients 90 years of age and older. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:179-83.
28. Joshi AB, Markovic L, Gill G. Knee arthroplasty in octogenarians: results at 10 years. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:295-8.