A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 37-42

  Nutton, R W ^a   Van Der Linden, M L ^a,b   Rowe, P J ^a,c   Gaston, P ^a   Wade, F A ^a  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GONIOMETRY; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38749144044     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B1.19702     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, Axe MJ, Snyder-Macker L. Preoperative quadriceps strength predicts functional ability one year after total knee arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2005;32:1533-9.
2. Parent E, Moffet H. Preoperative predictors of locomotor ability two months after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:36-50.
3. Maohomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, et al. The importance of patient expectations in prediction functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002;29:1273-9.
4. Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, et al. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop 2002;404:172-88.
5. Schai PA, Gibson AJ, Scott RD. Kneeling ability after total knee arthroplasty: perception and reality. Clin Orthop 1999;367:195-200.
6. Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S, Li G, Rubash HE. Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop 2003;416:167-73.
7. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, et al. A high flexion total knee arthroplasty design replicates healthy knee motion. Clin Orthop 2004;428:174-9.
8. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, Vandenneucker A, Moemans A. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:50-3.
9. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trial. Lancet 2001;357:1191-4.
10. Ritter MA, Harry LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Predicting range of movement after total knee arthroplasty: clustering log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:1278-85.
11. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to score Version 2 of the SF-36® Health Survey (Standard and Acute Forms): Lincoln: Quality Metric Incorporated. 2002.
12. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-14.
13. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of the WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40.
14. Massin P, Gournay A. Optimization of the posterior condylar offset, tibial slope and condylar roll-back in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:889-96.
15. Most E, Sultan PG, Park SE, Papannagari R. Li G. Tibiofemoral contact behaviour is improved in high-flexion cruciate retaining TKA. Clin Orthop 2006;452:59-64.
16. Gupta SK, Ranawat AG, Shah V, et al. The PFC Sigma RP-F TKA design for improved performance: a matched-pair study. Orthopedics 2006;29(Suppl):49-52.
17. Bin SI, Nam TS. Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007;15:350-6.
18. Kim YH, Sohn KG, Kim JS. Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilised total knee prostheses: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;86-A:1470-5.
19. Seon JK, Song EK, Lee JY. Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005;28(Suppl):1247-50.
20. Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ. The early result of high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of two years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:674-9.
21. Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Hillmann SJ, Hazlewood ME. Validation of flexible electrogoniometry as a measure of joint kinematics. Physiotherapy 2001;87:479-88.
22. Myles CM, Rowe PJ, Walker CR, Nutton RW. Knee joint functional range of movement prior and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture 2002;16:46-54.
23. van der Linden ML, Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Burnett R, Nutton RW. Knee kinematics in functional activities seven years after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007;22:537-42.
24. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Second ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, 1988.
25. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Second ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Health, 2000.