Managing written and oral negative feedback in a synchronous online teaching situation

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 181-197

  Guichon, Nicolas ^a   Bétrancourt, Mireille ^b   Prié, Yannick ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LUMIÈRE LYON 2   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

negative feedback; teaching strategies; tutoring aids; videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857096866     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2011.636054     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baddeley, A.D. 1986. Working memory, Oxford, UK: ClarendonPress.
2. Band, G., Jolicoeur, P., Akyürek, E. and Memelink, J. 2006. Integrative views on dual-task costs. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18: 481-492.
3. Belz, J.A. and Müller-Hartmann, A. 2003. Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1): 71-89.
4. Bétrancourt, M., Guichon, N., and Prié, Y. Assessing the use of a trace-based synchronous tool for distant language tutoring. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. pp.478-485. Hong-Kong: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
5. Bower, J. and Kawaguchi, S. 2011. Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem. Language Learning & Technology, 15: 41-71.
6. Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. 1996. Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10: 151-170.
7. Dejean-Thircuir, C. and Mangenot, F. Pairs ou tutrices? Pluralité des positionnements d'étudiantes de maîtrise FLE lors d'interactions en ligne avec des apprenants australiens. Les échanges en ligne dans apprentissage et la formation. pp.75-86. Paris: CLE International.
8. Develotte, C., Guichon, N. and Kern, R. Allo Berkeley? Ici Lyon vous nous voyez bien?, Étude d'un dispositif de formation en ligne synchrone franco-américain à travers les discours de ses usagers. Alsic, 11129-156.
9. Develotte, C., Guichon, N. and Vincent, C. 2010. The use of the webcam for teaching a foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment. ReCALL, 23: 293-312.
10. Doughty, C.J. and Long, M.H. 2003. Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language learning and technology, 7: 50-80.
11. Gass, S.M. 2003. "Input and interaction". In The handbook of second language acquisition, Edited by: Doughty, C.J. and Long, M. 224-255. Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Guichon, N. 2009. Training future language teachers to develop online tutors' competence through reflective analysis. ReCALL, 21: 166-185.
13. Guichon, N. 2010). Preparatory study for the design of a desktop videoconferencing platform for synchronous language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23: 171-184.
14. Guichon, N. and Hauck, M. 2011. Teacher education research in CALL and CMC: More in demand than ever. ReCALL, 23: 187-199.
15. Joiner, R., Scanlon, E., O'Shea, T., Smith, R.B. and Blake, C. Evidence from a series of experiments on video-mediated collaboration: Does eye contact matter?. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL 2002. USA: University of Colorado.
16. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. 1999. Managing split attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13: 351-371.
17. Kost, C.R. 2008. "Use of communication strategies in a synchronous CMC environment". In Mediating discourse online, Edited by: Sieloff Magnan, S. 153-189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Levy, M. and Stockwell, G. 2006. CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Long, M.H. 1996. "The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition". In Handbook of second language acquisition, Edited by: Ritchie, W.C. and Bahtia, T.K. 413-468. New York: Academic Press.
20. Mangenot, F. and Zourou, K. 2007. Pratiques tutorales correctives via internet: Le cas du français en première ligne. Alsic, 10: 65-99.
21. Mayer, R.E. and Moreno, R. 2002. Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12: 107-119.
22. Norrick, N. 1991). On the organization of corrective exchange in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 16: 59-83.
23. O'Dowd, R. 2007. Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange. ELT Journal, 61: 144-152.
24. Plass, J.L. and Jones, L.C. 2005). "Multimedia learning in second language acquisition". In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Edited by: Mayer, R.E. 467-488. Cambridge: CUP.
25. Schmidt, R. 2001. "Attention". In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, Edited by: Robinson, P. 3-32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Sotillo, S. 2005). Corrective feedback via instant messenger - learning activities in NS-NNS and NNS-NNS dyads. CALICO Journal, 22: 467-496.
27. Sweller, J. 2005. "Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning". In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Edited by: Mayer, R.E. 19-30. Cambridge: CUP.
28. Vinagre, M. and Munoz, B. 2011. Computer-mediated corrective feedback and language accuracy in telecollaborative exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1): 72-103.
29. Ware, P. and O'Dowd, R. 2008. Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1): 43-63.
30. Wickens, C.D. 1983. "Processing resources in attention, dual task performance, and workload assessment". In Varieties of attention, Edited by: Parasuraman, R. and Davies, R. 63-102. New York: Academic Press.