Aids to computer-based multimedia learning

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 107-119

  Mayer, Richard E ^a   Moreno, Roxana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Animation; Design principles; Multimedia learning; Narration; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012855917     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332.
4. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149-210.
5. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Garner, R., Gillingham, M., & White, C. (1989). Effects of seductive details on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57.
7. Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: on the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102.
8. Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: a theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414-434.
9. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40, 1-17.
10. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
11. Lambert, N. M., & McCombs, B. L. (1998). How students learn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: the SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357-371.
13. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
14. Mayer, R. E. (1999a). Research-based principles for the design of instructional messages: the case of multimedia explanations. Document Design, 1, 7-20.
15. Mayer, R. E. (1999b). Multimedia aids to problem solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 611-623.
16. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484-490.
17. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452.
18. Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187-198.
19. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320.
20. Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., & Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 638-643.
21. Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 389-401.
22. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia design: the role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358-368.
23. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: the case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 117-125.
24. Mousavi, S., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319-334.
25. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Schnotz, W., Boeckheler, J., & Grzondziel, H. (1999). Individual and co-operative learning with interactive animated pictures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 245-265.
28. Schnotz, W., Picard, E., & Henninger, M. (1994). The use of graphics and text in constructing mental models. In W. Schnotz, & R. W. Kulhavy, Comprehension of graphics (pp. 185-206). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
29. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER Press.
30. Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes in reading comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.