Does framing a problem-solving scenario influence learning?

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 27-34

  Mathews, Moffat ^a   Mitrovic, Antonija ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Framing learning sessions; ITS; Teaching models

Indexed keywords

CONTROL GROUPS; DATABASE QUERYING; DOMAIN EXPERTS; EVALUATION; EVALUATION STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; GROUP-BASED; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; ITS; LEARNING ACTIVITY; LEARNING GAIN; LEARNING SESSIONS; LEARNING THEORY; POTENTIAL EFFECTS; TEACHING MODELS; WHITE BOARD;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION COMPUTING;

TEACHING;

EID: 84857083626     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Andreasen, R. J., & Wu, C.-H. (1999). Study Abroad Program as an Experiential, Capstone Course: a Proposed Model. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Association for International Agricultural and Extension Education, Trinidad & Tobago.
2. Atkins, S., & Murphy, K. (1993). Reflection: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18(8), 1188-1192.
3. Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-Explaining Expository Texts: The Dual Processes of Generating Inferences and Repairing Mental Models. In R. Glasser (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology: Educational Design and Cognitive Science (Vol. 5, pp. 161 - 238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Katz, S., Allbritton, D., & Connelly, J. (2003). Going Beyond the Problem Given: How Human Tutors Use Post-Solution Discussions to Support Transfer. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(1), 79-116.
5. Katz, S., Connelly, J., & Wilson, C. (2007). Out of the Lab and into the Classroom: An Evaluation of Reflective Dialogue in Andes. In R. Luckin, K. R. Koedinger & J. E. Greer (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (Vol. 158, pp. 45-432): IOS Press.
6. Kay, J. (1997). Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to give Learner Control and Responsibility. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education, Sarawak, Malaysia.
7. Kirschner, P. A., Clark, R. E., & Sweller, J. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
8. Lee, A. Y., & Hutchison, L. (1998). Improving Learning from Examples through Reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(3), 187-210.
9. Leinhardt, G., & Ohlsson, S. (1990). Tutorials on the structure of tutoring from teachers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2(1), 21-46.
10. Martin, B., Koedinger, K. R., Mitrovic, A., & Mathan, S. (2005). On Using Learning Curves to Evaluate ITS. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam.
11. Mathews, M., & Mitrovic, A. (2008). How does students' help-seeking behaviour affect learning? Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, Canada.
12. Mitrovic, A. (2003). An Intelligent SQL Tutor on the Web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2-4), 173-197.
13. Mitrovic, A., & Martin, B. (2007). Evaluating the Effect of Open Student Models on Self-Assessment. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Ed., 17(2), 121-144.
14. Paas, F. G. W. C., & Merrinboer, J. J. G. V. (1993). The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35, 737-743.