Response to intervention in mathematics: Critical elements

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 257-272

  Lembke, Erica S ^a   Hampton, David ^a   Beyers, Sarah J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857036065     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.21596     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allsopp, D. H., Kyger, M. M., & Lovin, L. H. (2007). Teaching mathematics meaningfully: Solutions for reaching struggling learners. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
2. Baglici, S. P., Codding, R., & Tyron G. (2010). Extending the research on the tests of early numeracy: Longitudinal analyses over two school years. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(2), 89-102.
3. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R., Scammacca, N., and Chavez, M. M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first and second grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 20-32.
4. Burns, M. K. (2005). Using incremental rehearsal to increase fluency of single digit multiplication facts with children identified as learning disabled in mathematics computation. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 237-249.
5. Chard, D. J., Clarke, B., Baker, S., Otterstedt, J., Braun, D., & Katz, R. (2005). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(3), 3-14.
6. Clarke, B., Baker, S., Smolkowski, K., & Chard, D. (2008). An analysis of early numeracy curriculum-based measurement: Examining the role of growth in student outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 46-57.
7. Clarke, B., Lembke, E. S., Hampton, D., & Hendricker, E. (2011). Understanding the R in RtI: What we know and what we need to know about measuring student response in mathematics. In R. Gersten & R. Newman-Gonchar (Eds.), Understanding RtI in mathematics: Proven methods and applications (pp. 35-48). Baltimore: Brookes.
8. Clarke, B., & Shinn, M. R. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33, 234-248.
9. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
10. Foegen, A. (2000). Technical adequacy of general outcome measures for middle school mathematics. Diagnostique, 25, 175-203.
11. Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 41, 121-139.
12. Foegen, A., Olson, J. R., & Impecoven-Lind, L. (2008). Developing progress monitoring measures for secondary mathematics: An illustration in algebra. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 240-249.
13. Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Education, Psychology, 97, 493-513.
14. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Identifying learning disabilities with RtI. Perspectives, 32, 39-43.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Bryant, J. D., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for responsiveness to intervention. Exceptional Children, 73, 311-330.
16. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hollenbeck, K. H. (2007). Extending responsiveness to intervention to mathematics at first and third grades. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22, 13-24.
17. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., & Powell, S. R. (2002). Enhancing first grade children's mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychology Review, 31, 569-584.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Sccthaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive intervantion for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principle of effective practice. Learning Disabilities quarterly, 31, 79-92.
19. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic math computation (2nd ed.) [Computer software, manual, and blackline masters]. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
20. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic math concepts and applications [Computer software, manual, and blackline masters]. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
21. Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., et al. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: Naional Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from
22. Gersten, R., Chard, D., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2008). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities or difficulty learning mathematics: A synthesis of the intervention research. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction. Retrieved from
23. Hampton, D., Lembke, E., Lee, Y. S., Pappas, S., Chiong, C., & Ginsberg, H. (in press). Technical adequacy of early numeracy curriculum-based progress monitoring measures for kindergarten and first grade students. Assessment for Effective Intervention.
24. Hoover, J. J., & Love, E. (2011). Supporting school-based response to intervention: A practitioner's model. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(3), 40-48.
25. Hosp, M. K., Hosp. J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABC's of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford Press.
26. Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2007). Response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
27. Kelley, B., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2008). Curriculum-based evaluation and math: An overview. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33(4), 250-256.
28. Lembke, E., & Foegen, A. (2009). Identifying early numeracy indicators for kindergarten and first grade students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 12-20.
29. Lembke, E. S., Foegen, A., Whittaker, T. A., & Hampton, D. (2008). Establishing technical adequate measures of progress in early numeracy. Assessment for effective intervention, 33(4), 206-214.
30. Lembke, E. S., McMaster, K. L., & Stecker, P. M. (2010). The prevention science of reading research within a response-to-intervention model. Psychology in the School, 47(1), 22-35.
31. Minskoff, E., & Allsopp, D. H. (2003). Academic success strategies for adolescents with Learning disabilities and ADHD. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
32. National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010, March). Essential components of RtI - A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.
33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
34. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC.
35. National Research Council & Institute of Medicine. (2009). Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: Progress and possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
36. Riccomini, P. J., & Witzel, B. S. (2010). Response to intervention in math. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
37. Shapiro, E. S., Keller, M. A., Lutz, J. G., Santoro, L. E. & Hintze, J. M. (2006). Curriculum-based measures and performance on state assessment and standardized tests: Reading and math performance in Pennsylvania. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(1), 19-35.
38. Skinner, C. H., Turco, T. L., Beatty, K. L., Rasavage, C. (1989). Cover, copy, and compare: A method for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18, 412-420.
39. Stecker, P. M., Lembke, E. S., & Foegen, A. (2008). Using progress-monitoring data to improve instructional decision making. Preventing School Failure, 52, 48-58.
40. Tilly W. D., III, (2002). Best practices in school psychology as a problem solving enterprise. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 21-36). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
41. VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., Naquin, G., & Noell, G. (2001). The reliability and validity of curriculum-based measurement readiness probes for kindergarten students. School Psychology Review, 30, 363-382.
42. Zirkel, P. A., & Thomas, L. B. (2010). State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(3), 56-63.