Won't get fooled again: An event-related potential study of task and repetition effects on the semantic processing of items without semantics

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 257-274

  Laszlo, Sarah ^a   Stites, Mallory ^a   Federmeier, Kara D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

ERPs; Lexical decision; N400; Semantic access

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEXICAL DECISION TASK; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL FUNCTION; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPETITION PRIMING; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84856845794     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.606667     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Borowsky, R. and Besner, D. 1993. Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19: 813-840.
2. Borowsky, R. and Besner, D. 2006. Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: Are a few stages necessary?. Psychological Review, 113: 181-195.
3. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T. and Besner, D. 1977. "Access to the internal lexicon". In Attention and performance VI, Edited by: Dornic, S. 535-555. New York: Academic Press.
4. Dale A. M. Source localization and spatial discriminant analysis of event-related potentials: Linear approaches Unpublished doctoral dissertation 1994 La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego
5. Deacon, D., Dynowska, A., Ritter, W. and Grose-Fifer, J. 2004. Repetition and semantic priming of nonwords: Implications for theories of N400 and word recognition. Psychophysiology, 41: 60-74.
6. Duzel, E., Yonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H. J. and Tulving, E. 1997. Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94: 5973-5978.
7. Evans, K. M. and Federmeier, K. D. 2007. The memory that's right and the memory that's left: Event-related potentials reveal hemispheric asymmetries in the encoding and retention of verbal information. Neuropsychologia, 45: 1777-1790.
8. Forster, K. I. 1999. The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and Language, 68: 5-15.
9. Forster, K. I. and Davis, C. 1984. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10: 680-698.
10. Forster, K. I. and Hector, J. 2002. Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: The turple effect. Memory & Cognition, 30: 1106-1117.
11. Forster, K. I. and Veres, C. 1998. The prime lexicality effect: Form-pr Timing as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24: 498-514.
12. Hagoort, P., Baggio, G. and Willems, R. M. 2009. "Semantic unification". In The cognitive neurosciences, 4th ed., Edited by: Gazzaniga, M. 819-836. Boston: MIT Press.
13. Harm, M. W. and Seidenberg, M. S. 2004. Computing the meaning of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111: 662-720.
14. Humphreys, G. W., Price, C. and Riddoch, M. J. 1999. From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Research, 62: 118-130.
15. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (in press). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP) Annual Review of Psychology.
16. Landauer, T. K. and Dumais, S. T. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104: 211-240.
17. Laszlo, S. and Federmeier, K. D. 2007. Better the DVL you know: Acronyms reveal the contribution of familiarity to single word reading. Psychological Science, 18: 122-126.
18. Laszlo, S. and Federmeier, K. D. 2008. Minding the PS, queues, and PXQs: Uniformity of semantic processing across multiple stimulus types. Psychophysiology, 45: 458-466.
19. Laszlo, S. and Federmeier, K. D. 2009. A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61: 326-338.
20. Laszlo, S. and Federmeier, K. D. 2011. The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology, 48: 176-186.
21. Laszlo S. Plaut D. C. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2011 Simulating event-related potential reading data in a neurally plausible parallel distributed processing model Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
22. Laszlo, S., & Plaut, D. C. (under review). A neurally plausible parallel distributed processing model of event-related potential reading data. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23. Lund, K. and Burgess, C. 1996. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, Computers, 28: 203-208.
24. Marcus, M., Santorini, B. and Marcinkiewicz, M. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19: 313-330.
25. McCarthy, G. and Nobre, A. C. 1993. Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. Electroencephalograpy and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88: 210-219.
26. Medler, D. A., & Binder, J. R. 2005. MCWord: An on-line orthographic database of the English language. Retrieved fromhttp://www.neuro.mcw.edu/mcword/
27. Misra, M. and Holcomb, P. J. 2003. Event-related potential indices of masked repetition priming. Psychophysiology, 40: 115-130.
28. Petit, J. P., Midgley, K. M., Holcomb, P. J. and Grainger, J. 2006. On the time course of letter perception: A masked priming ERP investigation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13: 674-681.
29. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S. and Patterson, K. 1996. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103: 56-115.
30. Plaut, D. C. and Shallice, T. 1993. Perseverative and semantic influences on visual object naming errors in optic aphasia: A connectionist account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5: 89-117.
31. Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P. and McKoon, G. 2004. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111: 159-182.
32. Rugg, M. D., Furda, J. and Lorist, M. 1988. The effects of task on the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition. Psychophysiology, 25: 55-63.
33. Rugg, M. D. and Nagy, M. E. 1987. Lexical contribution ot nonword repetition effects: Evidence from event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 15: 473-481.
34. Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K. and Posner, M. I. 1998. Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 9: 2195-2200.
35. Spieler, D. H. and Balota, D. A. 1997. Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8: 411-416.
36. Vissers, C. Th. W. M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. 2006 1106. Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences Brain Research 150 163
37. Voss, J. L. and Paller, K. A. 2007. Neural correlates of conceptual implicit memory and their contamination of putative neural correlates of explicit memory. Learning & Memory, 14: 259-267.
38. Voss, J. L., Schendan, H. E. and Paller, K. A. 2010. Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming. NeuroImage, 49: 2879-2889.
39. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Steyvers, M., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Shiffrin, R. M., van Rijn, H. and Zeelenberg, R. 2004. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task. Cognitive Psychology, 48: 332-367.