Exploration zones: A framework for describing the emergent structure of learning activities

Everyday Matters in Science and Mathematics: Studies of Complex Classroom Events

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 329-366

  Sherin, Bruce L ^a   Azevedo, Flávio S ^b   DiSessa, Andrea A ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917379768     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611666     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Azevedo, F.S. (1998). Inventing mapping: Meta-representational competence for spatially distributed data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA.
2. Azevedo, F.S. (2000). Designing representations of terrain: A study in metarepresentational competence. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4), 443-480.
3. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K.McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L.Schauble & R.Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Collins, A. (1995). Design issues for learning environments. In S.Vosniadou, E.de Corte, & H.Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the psychological foundations of technology-based learning environments (pp. 347-361). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M.Csikszentmihalyi & I.S.Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15-35). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. diSessa, A., & Sherin, B. (2000). Meta-representation: An introduction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4), 385-398.
8. diSessa, A.A. (1992). Images of learning. In E.De Corte, M.C.Linn, H.Mandl, & L.Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 19-40). Berlin: Springer.
9. diSessa, A.A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. diSessa, A.A. (2002). Students' criteria for representational adequacy. In K.Gravemeijer, R.Lehrer, B.van Oers, & L.Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling, and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 105-129). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11. diSessa, A.A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117-160.
12. diSessa, A.A., & Minstrell, J. (1998). Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons. In J.G.Greeno (Ed.), Thinking practices (pp. 155-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Granados, R. (2000). Constructing intersubjectivity in representational design activities. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4), 503-530.
14. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated/earning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. Lepper, M.R., & Cordova, D.I. (1992). A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation. Motivation & Emotion, 16(3), 187-208.
18. Madanes, R. (1997). Teaching through discussion: Using critical moves and support moves. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Eductional Research Association, Chicago, IL.
19. Marks, H.M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184.
20. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Newmann, F.M. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Reiser, B., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W.A., Smith, B.K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A.J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S.M.Carver & D.Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263-305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Sherin, B. (1997). The elements of representational design. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Educational Research., Chicago, IL.
25. Sherin, B. (2000). How students invent representations of motion: A genetic account. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4), 399-441.
26. Willats, J. (1985). Drawing systems revisited: The role of denotation systems in children's figure drawings. In N.H.Freeman & M.V.Cox (Eds.), Visual Order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 374-384). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Wood, D., & Fels, J. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford Press.
28. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical Norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.