Uninformative visual experience establishes long term perceptual bias

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 1905-1911

  Harrison, S J ^a   Backus, B T ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian prior; Necker cube; Perceptual bias; Perceptual learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

BAYES THEOREM; CUES; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; ROTATION;

EID: 77955558527     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams W.J., Banks M.S., van Ee R. Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(11):1063-1064.
2. Babich S., Standing L. Satiation effects with reversible figures. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1981, 52(1):203-210.
3. Backus B.T. The mixture of Bernoulli experts: A theory to quantify reliance on cues in dichotomous perceptual decisions. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(1). 6, 1-19.
4. Backus B.T., Haijiang Q. Competition between newly recruited and pre-existing visual cues during the construction of visual appearance. Vision Research 2007, 47(7):919-924.
5. Barlow H. A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual aftereffects. Vision: Coding and efficiency 1990, Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge, UK. C. Blakemore (Ed.).
6. Brascamp J.W., Knapen T.H., Kanai R., Noest A.J., van Ee R., van den Berg A.V. Multi-timescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(1):e1497.
7. Braun J., Pastukhov A. Unambiguous stimuli have no persistence. Journal of Vision 2008, 7(9):22.
8. Dosher B.A., Sperling G., Wurst S.A. Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure. Vision Research 1986, 26(6):973-990.
9. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S., Bulthoff H.H. Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3(1):69-73.
10. Geisler W.S., Kersten D. Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(6):508-510.
11. Geisler W.S., Kersten D. Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(6):508-510.
12. Haijiang Q., Saunders J.A., Stone R.W., Backus B.T. Demonstration of cue recruitment: Change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(2):483-488.
13. Harrison S.J., Backus B.T. Disambiguating Necker cube rotation using a location cue: What types of spatial location signal can the visual system learn?. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(6). 23, 1--15.
14. Jacobs R.A., Fine I. Experience-dependent integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Research 1999, 39(24):4062-4075.
15. Kersten D., Mamassian P., Yuille A. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:271-304.
16. Kersten D., O'Toole A.J., Sereno M.E., Knill D.C., Anderson J.A. Associative learning of scene parameters from images. Applied Optics 1987, 26(23):4999-5006.
17. Kersten D., O'Toole A.J., Sereno M.E., Knill D.C., Anderson J.A. Associative learning of scene parameters from images. Applied Optics 1987, 26:4999-5006.
18. Klink P.C., van Ee R., Nijs M.M., Brouwer G.J., Noest A.J., van Wezel R.J. Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(5). 16, 11-18.
19. Knapen T., Brascamp J., Adams W.J., Graf E.W. The spatial scale of perceptual memory in ambiguous figure perception. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(13). 16, 1-12.
20. Knill D., Richards W. Perception as Bayesian inference 1996, Cambridge University Press, London.
21. Knill D.C., Saunders J.A. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?. Vision Research 2003, 43(24):2539-2558.
22. Kohler I. Experiments with goggles. Scientific American 1962, 206:62-72.
23. Leopold D.A., Wilke M., Maier A., Logothetis N.K. Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(6):605-609.
24. Long G.M., Moran C.J. How to keep a reversible figure from reversing: Teasing out top-down and bottom-up processes. Perception 2007, 36(3):431-445.
25. Long G.M., Toppino T.C., Kostenbauder J.F. As the cube turns: Evidence for two processes in the perception of a dynamic reversible figure. Perception and Psychophysics 1983, 34(1):29-38.
26. Nawrot M., Blake R. The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception and Psychophysics 1991, 49(3):230-244.
27. Nawrot M., Blake R. On the perceptual identity of dynamic stereopsis and kinetic depth. Vision Research 1993, 33(11):1561-1571.
28. Noest A.J., van Ee R., Nijs M.M., van Wezel R.J. Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(8):10.
29. Orbach J., Ehrlich D., Heath H.A. Reversibility of the Necker cube. I. An examination of the concept of " satiation of orientation" Perceptual and Motor Skills 1963, 17:439-458.
30. Pearson J., Clifford C.W. Mechanisms selectively engaged in rivalry: Normal vision habituates, rivalrous vision primes. Vision Research 2005, 45(6):707-714.
31. Rouse M.W., Tittle J.S., Braunstein M.L. Stereoscopic depth perception by static stereo-deficient observers in dynamic displays with constant and changing disparity. Optometry and Vision Science 1989, 66(6):355-362.
32. Sinha P., Poggio T. Role of learning in three-dimensional form perception. Nature 1996, 384(6608):460-463.
33. Wallach H., Austin P. Recognition and the localization of visual traces. American Journal of Psychology 1954, 67:338-340.
34. Webster M.A., Werner J.S., Field D.J. Adaptation and the phenomenology of perception. Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and aftereffects in high level vision 2005, 241-277. Oxford University Press, Oxford. C.W.G. Clifford, G. Rhodes (Eds.).
35. Weiss Y., Simoncelli E.P., Adelson E.H. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(6):598-604.