On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature

Cladistics

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 190-194

  Srivathsan, Amrita ^a,b   Meier, Rudolf ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; DIVERGENCE; LITERATURE REVIEW; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHYLOGENETICS; TAXONOMY;

EID: 84856263745     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00370.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allcock, A.L., Barratt, I., Eleaume, M., Linse, K., Norman, M.D., Smith, P.J., Steinke, D., Stevens, D.W., Strugnell, J.M., 2011. Cryptic speciation and the circumpolarity debate: a case study on endemic Southern Ocean octopuses using the COI barcode of life. Deep-Sea Res. 58 (Pt. II), 242-249.
2. Baird, D.J., Pascoe, T.J., Zhou, X., Hajibabaei, M., 2011. Building freshwater macroinvertebrate DNA-barcode libraries from reference collection material: formalin preservation vs specimen age. J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 30, 125-130.
3. Baldwin, C.C., Castillo, C.I., Weigt, L.A., Victor, B.C., 2011. Seven new species within western Atlantic Starksia atlantica, S. lepicoelia, and S. sluiteri (Teleostei, Labrisomidae), with comments on congruence of DNA barcodes and species. ZooKeys 79, 21-72.
4. Brower, A.V.Z., 2006. Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimitation: 'ten species' of Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidoptera : Hesperiidae). Syst. Biodivers. 4, 127-132.
5. DeSalle, R., Egan, M.G., Siddall, M., 2005. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 1905-1916.
6. Dettai, A., Lautredou, A.C., Bonillo, C., Goimbault, E., Busson, F., Causse, R., Couloux, A., Cruaud, C., Duhamel, G., Denys, G., Hautecoeur, M., Iglesias, S., Koubbi, P., Lecointre, G., Moteki, M., Pruvost, P., Tercerie, S., Ozouf, C., 2011. The actinopterygian diversity of the CEAMARC cruises: barcoding and molecular taxonomy as a multi-level tool for new findings. Deep-Sea Res. 58 (Pt. II), 250-263.
7. Ekrem, T., Stur, E., Hebert, P.D.N., 2010. Females do count: documenting Chironomidae (Diptera) species diversity using DNA barcoding. Org. Divers. Evol. 10, 397-408.
8. Francis, C.M., Borisenko, A.V., Ivanova, N.V., Eger, J.L., Lim, B.K., Guillen-Servent, A., Kruskop, S.V., Mackie, I., Hebert, P.D., 2010. The role of DNA barcodes in understanding and conservation of mammal diversity in southeast Asia. PLoS ONE 5, e12575.
9. Guindon, S., Gascuel, O., 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 54, 696-704.
10. Hebert, P.D., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., deWaard, J.R., 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270, 313-321.
11. James, S.W., Porco, D., Decaens, T., Richard, B., Rougerie, R., Erseus, C., 2010. DNA barcoding reveals cryptic diversity in Lumbricus terrestris L., 1758 (Clitellata): resurrection of L. herculeus (Savigny, 1826). PLoS One 5, e15629.
12. Kimura, M., 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111-120.
13. Kuksa, P., Pavlovic, V., 2007. Fast kernel methods for SVM sequence classifiers. Giancarlo, R., Hannenhalli, S. (Eds.), Algorithms in Bioinformatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp. 228-239.
14. Lakra, W.S., Verma, M.S., Goswami, M., Lal, K.K., Mohindra, V., Punia, P., Gopalakrishnan, A., Singh, K.V., Ward, R.D., Hebert, P., 2011. DNA barcoding Indian marine fishes. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11, 60-71.
15. Lee, S.C., Chiou, S.J., Yen, J.H., Lin, T.Y., Hsieh, K.T., Yang, J.C., 2010. DNA barcoding Cinnamomum osmophloeum Kaneh. based on the partial non-coding ITS2 region of ribosomal genes. J. Food Drug Anal. 18, 128-135.
16. Little, D.P., Stevenson, D.W., 2007. A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms. Cladistics 23, 1-21.
17. Magnacca, K.N., Brown, M.J., 2010. Mitochondrial heteroplasmy and DNA barcoding in Hawaiian Hylaeus (Nesoprosopis) bees (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 174.
18. Mecklenburg, B.W., Moller, P.R., Steinke, D., 2011. Biodiversity of arctic marine fishes: taxonomy and zoogeography. Mar. Biodiv. 41, 109-140.
19. Meier, R., 2008. DNA Sequences in taxonomy: opportunities and challenges. Wheeler, Q. (Ed.), The New Taxonomy. Systematics Association Special Volume. CRC Press, New York, pp. 95-128.
20. Meier, R., Shiyang, K., Vaidya, G., Ng, P.K., 2006. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst. Biol. 55, 715-728.
21. Meier, R., Zhang, G., Ali, F., 2008. The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exaggerates the size of the 'barcoding gap' and leads to misidentification. Syst. Biol. 57, 809-813.
22. Meyer, C.P., Paulay, G., 2005. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biol. 3, e422.
23. Mitter, K.T., Larsen, T.B., de Prins, W., de Prins, J., Collins, S., Weghe, G.V., Safian, S., Zakharov, E.V., Hawthorne, D.J., Kawahara, A.Y., Regier, J.C., 2011. The butterfly subfamily Pseudopontiinae is not monobasic: marked genetic diversity and morphology reveal three new species of Pseudopontia (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Syst. Entomol. 36, 139-163.
24. Moniz, M.B.J., Kaczmarska, I., 2010. Barcoding of diatoms: nuclear encoded ITS revisited. Protist 161, 7-34.
25. Moritz, C., Cicero, C., 2004. DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol. 10, e354.
26. Nei, M., Kumar, S., 2005. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York.
27. Pang, X., Song, J., Zhu, Y., Hongxi, X., Huang, L., Chen, S., 2011. Applying plant DNA barcodes for Rosaceae species identification. Cladistics 27, 165-170.
28. Pauls, S.U., Blahnik, R.J., Zhou, X., Wardwell, C.T., Holzenthal, R.W., 2010. DNA barcode data confirm new species and reveal cryptic diversity in Chilean Smicridea (Smicridea) (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae). J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 29, 1058-1074.
29. Posada, D., 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1253-1256.
30. Ratnasingham, S., Hebert, P.D., 2007. BOLD: Barcode of Life Data Systems (). Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 1-10.
31. Ren, B.Q., Xiang, X.G., Chen, Z.D., 2010. Species identification of Alnus (Betulaceae) using nrDNA and cpDNA genetic markers. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 594-605.
32. Roe, A.D., Sperling, F.A.H., 2007. Patterns of evolution of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I and II DNA and implications for DNA barcoding. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44, 325-345.
33. Rubinoff, D., 2006. Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1026-1033.
34. Sarkar, I.N., Planet, P.J., Desalle, R., 2008. CAOS software for use in character-based DNA barcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 1256-1259.
35. Sperling, F., 2003. DNA barcoding: deus ex machina. Newsl. Biol. Surv. Can. (Terrestr. Arthrop.) 22, 50-53.
36. Sweeney, B.W., Battle, J.M., Jackson, J.K., 2011. Can DNA barcodes of stream macroinvertebrates improve descriptions of community structure and water quality? J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 30, 195-216.
37. Swofford, D.L., 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
38. Victor, B.C., 2010. Emblemariopsis carib and Emblemariopsis arawak, two new chaenopsid blennies from the Caribbean Sea: DNA barcoding identifies males, females, and juveniles and distinguishes sympatric cryptic species. J. Ocean Sci. Found. 4, 1-30.
39. Ward, R.D., Hanner, R., Hebert, P.D., 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J. Fish Biol. 74, 329-356.
40. Will, K.W., Rubinoff, D., 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20, 47-55.
41. Will, K.W., Mishler, B.D., Wheeler, Q.D., 2005. The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54, 844-851.