A latent variable approach to the simple view of reading

Reading and Writing

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 433-464

  Kershaw, Sarah ^a   Schatschneider, Chris ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fluency; IQ; Reading comprehension; Simple view of reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856109666     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-010-9278-3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aaron, P. G., Joshi, M., & Williams, K. A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 120-137.
2. Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933-958.
3. Aimsweb. (2002). Reading curriculum based measurement oral reading fluency. Retrieved January 15, 2002 from www. aimsweb. com.
4. Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 545-557.
5. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31-42.
6. Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Adlof, S. M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In H.W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 2025-2040). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Chen, R., & Vellutino, F. R. (1997). Prediction of reading ability: A cross-validation study of the simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(1), 1-24.
8. De Beni, R., Palladino, P., Pazzaglia, F., & Cornoldi, C. (1998). Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 51A(2), 305-320.
9. Dreyer, L. G., & Katz, L. (1992). An examination of "The simple view of reading". National Reading Conference Yearbook, 41, 169-175.
10. Florida Department of Education (2003). Assessment and accountability briefing book. Retrieved from fcat. fldoe. org/pdf/fcataabb. pdf.
11. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239-256.
12. Gaulin, C. A., & Campbell, T. F. (1994). Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1), 55-64.
13. Georgiou, G. K., Das, J. P., & Hayward, D. (2009). Revisiting the "simple view of reading" in a group of children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 76-84.
14. Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 1-13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. RASE: Remedial & Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
16. Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-160.
18. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453.
19. Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719-729.
20. Johnson, E. S., Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (2005). Analyzing components of reading on performance assessments: An expanded simple view. Reading Psychology, 26(3), 267-283.
21. Johnston, T. C., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 339-361.
22. Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85-97.
23. Joshi, R. M., Williams, K. A., & Wood, J. R. (1998). Predicting reading comprehension from listening comprehension: Is this the answer to the IQ debate? In C. Hulme & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 319-327). Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
24. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological methods, 9(3), 275-300.
25. Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 839-853.
26. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2007). Mplus user's guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
27. Neuhaus, G. F., Roldan, L. W., Boulware-Gooden, R., & Swank, P. R. (2006). Parsimonious reading models: Identifying teachable subskills. Reading Psychology, 27(1), 37-58.
28. Rigdon, E. E., Schumacker, R. E., & Wothke, W. (1998). A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear modeling. In R.E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 1-16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., & Kitagawa, G. (1986). Akaike information criterion statistic. Tokyo: K. T. K. Scientific.
30. Savage, R. (2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(2), 143-164.
31. Savage, R., & Wolforth, J. (2007). An additive simple view of reading describes the performance of good and poor readers in higher education. Exceptionality Education Canada. Special Issue: Higher education students with reading and writing difficulties, 17(1-2), 243-268.
32. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177.
33. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Wisenbaker, J. M., Kuhn, M. R., Strauss, G. P., & Morris, R. D. (2006). Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 496-522.
34. Seigneuric, A., & Ehrlich, M.-F. (2005). Contribution of working memory capacity to children's reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 18(7-9), 617-656.
35. Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M.-F., Oakhill, J. V., & Yuill, N. M. (2000). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 13(1-2), 81-103.
36. Spear-Swerling, L. (2006). Children's reading comprehension and oral reading fluency in easy text. Reading and Writing, 19(2), 199-220.
37. Stothard, S. E., & Hulme, C. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children: The role of language comprehension and working memory skills. Reading and Writing, 4(3), 245-256.
38. Tilstra, J., McMaster, K., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Rapp, D. (2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(4), 383-401.
39. Tiu, R. D., Jr., Thompson, L. A., & Lewis, B. A. (2003). The role of IQ in a component model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(5), 424-436.
40. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
41. Yuill, N., Oakhill, J., & Parkin, A. J. (1989). Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly. British Journal of Psychology, 80(3), 351-361.