What Kinds of Numbers Do Students Assign to Literal Symbols? Aspects of the Transition from Arithmetic to Algebra

Mathematical Thinking and Learning

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-27

  Christou, Konstantinos P ^a   Vosniadou, Stella ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855981462     PISSN: 10986065     EISSN: 15327833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10986065.2012.625074     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Arcavi, A. 1994. Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3): 24-35.
2. Asquith, P., Stephens, A. C., Knuth, E. J. and Alibali, M. W. 2007. Middle school mathematics teachers' knowledge of students' understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3): 249-272.
3. Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T. R. and Lesh, R. 1992. "Rational number, ratio, and proportion". In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Edited by: Grouws, D. A. 296-333. New York, NY: Macmillan.
4. Booth, L. R. 1984. Algebra: Children's strategies and errors, Windsor, Berkshire, UK: NFER-Nelson.
5. Booth, L. R. 1988. Children's difficulties in beginning algebra.The ideas of algebra, K-I2 (1988 Yearbook), Edited by: Coxford, A. F. and Shulte, A. P. 20-32. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
6. Carpenter, T. P., Corbitt, M. K., Kepner, H. S. J., Lindquist, M. M. and Reys, R. E. 1981. Results from the second mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
7. Carpenter, T. P. and Fennema, E. 1992. Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 17: 457-470.
8. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E. and Franke, M. L. 1996. Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97: 3-20.
9. Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. and Brizuela, B. 2001. "Can young students operate on unknowns?". In Paper presented at the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Utrecht, The Netherlands
10. Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D. and Schwartz, J. 2007. "Early algebra is not the same as algebra early". In Algebra in the early grades, Edited by: Kaput, J., Carraher, D. W. and Blanton, M. 235-272. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Cedillo, T. and Kieran, C. 2003. "Initiating students into algebra with symbol-manipulating calculators". In Computer algebra systems in secondary school mathematics education, Edited by: Fey, J. T. 219-239. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
12. Cerulli, M. and Mariotti, M. A. 2001. "L'Algebrista: A Microworld for symbolic manipulation. In H. Chick, K". In Proceedings of the 12th IGMI Study Conference: The Future of Teaching and Learning of Algebra, Edited by: Stacey, J., Vincent and Vincent, J. 179-186. Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne.
13. Chiarugi, I., Fracassina, G. and Furinghetti, F. Learning difficulties behind the notion of absolute value. Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Oaxtepec, Mexico. Edited by: Booker, G., Cobb, P. and De Mendicutti, T. N. pp.231-238. PME. Vol. 3
14. Christou, K. P. and Vosniadou, S. Changing the way students interpret the phenomenal sign of algebraic expressions: The effect of direct instruction. Paper presented at the 14th European Conference on Research in Learning and Instruction. Exeter, UK. August.
15. Christou, K. P. and Vosniadou, S. August 2007. Students' interpretations of algebraic expressions in inequalities, August, Budapest, Hungary: Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference for Research in Learning and Instruction.
16. Collis, K. F. 1975. The development of formal reasoning, Newcastle, Australia: University of Newcastle.
17. Crowley, L., Thomas, M. and Tall, D. Algebra symbols, and translation of meaning. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Lisbon, Portugal. Edited by: da Ponte, J. P. and Matos, J. F. pp.240-247. PME. Vol. 2
18. Demby, A. 1997. Algebraic procedures used by 13- to 15-year-olds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33: 45-70.
19. Dettori, G., Garuti, R. and Lemut, E. 2001. "From arithmetic to algebraic thinking by using spreadsheet". In Perspectives on school algebra, Edited by: Sutherland, R., Rojano, T., Bell, A. and Lins, R. 191-207. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. diSessa, A. A. 1988. "Knowledge in pieces". In Constructivism in the computer age, Edited by: Forman, G. and Pufall, P. 49-70. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. diSessa, A. A. 1993. Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10: 105-225.
22. diSessa, A. A. 2008. "A bird's-eye view of the "pieces" vs. "coherence" controversy (from the "pieces" side of the fence)". In International handbook of research on conceptual change, Edited by: Vosniadou, S. 35-60. New York, NY: Routledge.
23. Dubinsky, E. 1991. "Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking". In Advanced mathematical thinking, Edited by: Tall, D. 95-123. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
24. Filloy, E. and Rojano, T. 1989. Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2): 19-25.
25. Filloy, E., Rojano, T. and Rubio, G. 2003. "Propositions concerning the resolutions of arithmetical-algebraic problems". In Perspectives on School Algebra, Edited by: Sutherland, R., Rojano, T., Bell, A. and Lins, R. 155-176. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
26. Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. and Marino, M. 1985. The role of implicit models in solving problems in multiplication and division. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 16: 3-17.
27. Fujii, T. Probing students' understanding of variables through cognitive conflict problems: Is the concept of variable so difficult for students to understand?. Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Edited by: Pateman, N. A., Dougherty, B. J. and Zilliox, J. T. pp.49-65. Honolulu, HI: PME. Vol. 1
28. Gallardo, A. 2002. The extension of the natural number domain to the integers in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49: 171-192.
29. Gelman, R. 2000. The epigenesis of mathematical thinking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21: 27-37.
30. Graham, A. T. and Thomas, M. O. J. 2000. Building a versatile understanding of algebraic variables with a graphic calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41: 265-282.
31. Gray, E. M. and Tall, D. O. 1994. Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A perceptual view of simple arithmetic. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2): 115-141.
32. Greer, B. Designing for conceptual change. Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Prague, Czech Republic. Edited by: Novotná, J., Moraová, H., Krátvá, M. and Stehlíková, N. pp.175-178. PME. Vol. 1
33. Harel, G., Behr, M., Post, T. and Lesh, R. 1994. "The impact of number type on the solution of multiplication and division problems: Further considerations". In The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics, Edited by: Harel, G. and Confrey, J. 365-388. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
34. Hart, K. M. 1981. Children's understanding of mathematics, 11-16. London, UK: John Murray.
35. Herscovics, N. and Linchevski, L. 1994. A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27: 59-78.
36. Johanning, D. I. 2004. Supporting the development of algebraic thinking in middle school: A closer look at students' informal strategies. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23: 371-388.
37. Kaput, J. 1989. "Linking representations in the symbol system of algebra". In Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra, Edited by: Wagner, S. and Kieran, C. 167-194. Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
38. Kaput, J. 2001. Employing children's natural powers to build algebraic reasoning in the content of elementary mathematics, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Kieran, C. 1992. "The learning and teaching of school algebra". In Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Edited by: Grouws, D. 390-419. New York, NY: Macmillan.
40. Kieran, C. 2007. "Learning and teaching of algebra at the middle school through college levels: Building meaning for symbols and their manipulation". In Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Edited by: Lester, F. K. Jr. 707-762. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
41. Kline, M. 1980. Mathematics, the loss of certainty, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42. Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., McNeil, N. M., Weinberg, A. and Stephens, A. C. 2005. Middle school understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equivalence and variable. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 37(1): 68-76.
43. Kuchemann, D. 1978. Children's understanding of numerical variables. Mathematics in School, 7(4): 23-26.
44. Kuchemann, D. 1981. "Algebra". In Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16, Edited by: Hart, K. 102-119. London, UK: John Murray.
45. Lee, L. and Wheeler, D. 1981. The arithmetic connection. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20: 41-54.
46. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O. and Stein, M. K. 1990. Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1): 1-64.
47. Linchevski, L. and Herscovics, N. 1996. Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: operating on the unknown in the context of equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30: 39-65.
48. MacGregor, M. and Stacey, K. 1997. Students' understanding of algebraic notation: 11-15. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(1): 1-19.
49. Mack, N. K. 1988. Learning fractions with understanding: Building upon informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21: 16-32.
50. Mack, N. K. 1993. "Learning rational numbers with understanding: The case of informal knowledge". In Rational numbers: An integration of research, Edited by: Carpenter, T., Fennema, E. and Romberg, T. 85-105. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Mack, N. K. 1995. Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26: 422-441.
52. Malara, N. A. An aspect of long-term research on algebra: The solution of verbal problems. Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education. Haifa, Israel. Edited by: Zaslavsky, O. pp.257-263. PME. Vol. 3
53. Malara, N. A. and Iaderosa, R. 2000. The interweaving of arithmetic and algebra: Some questions about syntactic, relational and structural aspects and their teaching and learning. European research in mathematics education, 2: 159-171.
54. Matz, M. 1980. Building a metaphoric theory of mathematical thought. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3(1): 93-166.
55. Moss, J. 2005. "Pipes, tubes, and beakers: New approaches to teaching the rational-number system. In S. Donovan". In How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom, Edited by: Bransford, J. D. 309-349. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56. Nathan, M. J. and Koellner, M. 2007. Introduction: A framework for understanding and cultivating the transition from arithmetic to algebraic reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3): 179-192.
57. Ni, Y. and Zhou, Y.-D. 2005. Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1): 27-52.
58. Nickson, M. 2000. Teaching and learning mathematics: A teacher's guide to recent research and its application, London, UK: Cassell.
59. Olive, J. 1999. From fractions to rational numbers of arithmetic: A reorganization hypothesis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(4): 279-314.
60. Programme for international Student Assessment (2003). Programme for international student assessment (PISA)-Country profiles. Retrieved from http://pisacountry.acer.edu.au/ (http://pisacountry.acer.edu.au/)
61. Resnick, L. B. 1987. "Understanding algebra". In Cognitive process in mathematics, Edited by: Sloboda, J. A. and Rogers, D. 169-203. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
62. Resnick, L. B. The dilemma of mathematical intuition in learning. Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Prague, Czech Republic. Edited by: Novotná, J., Moraová, H., Krátvá, M. and Stehlíková, N. pp.173-175. PME. Vol. 1
63. Sackur, C. Blind calculators in algebra: Write false interviews. Proceedings of the First European Research Conference on Mathematics Education. Osnabrück, Germany. Edited by: Cohors- Fresenborg, E. pp.82-85. University of Osnabrück. Ed
64. Schmittau, J. 2005. The development of algebraic thinking. ZDM, 37(1): 16-22.
65. Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J. and Arcavi, A. 1993. "Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain". In Advances in instructional psychology Vol. 4, Edited by: Glaser, R. 55-175. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Sfard, A. 1991. On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22: 1-36.
67. Sfard, A. 1995. The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14: 15-39.
68. Sfard, A. and Linchevski, L. 1994. The gains and the pitfalls of reification-The case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26: 191-228.
69. Stacey, K. and MacGregor, M. 1997. Ideas about symbolism that students bring to algebra. The Mathematics Teacher, 90(2): 110-113.
70. Stafylidou, S. and Vosniadou, S. 2004. Students' understanding of the numerical value of fractions: A conceptual change approach. Learning and Instruction, 14: 503-518.
71. Steffe, L. P. 1992. Schemes of action and operation involving composite units. Learning and Individual Differences, 4: 259-309.
72. Streefland, L. 1991. Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm of developmental research, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
73. Tirosh, D., Even, R. and Robinson, N. 1998. Simplifying algebraic expressions: Teacher awareness and teaching approaches. Educational studies in mathematics, 35: 51-64.
74. Vamvakoussi, X. and Vosniadou, S. 2007. "How many numbers are there in a rational numbers interval? Constraints, synthetic models, and the effect of the number line". In Re-framing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction, Edited by: Vosniadou, S., Baltas, A. and Vamvakoussi, X. 265-282. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
75. Vamvakoussi, X. and Vosniadou, S. 2010. How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students' understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2): 181-209.
76. Van Dooren, W., Christou, K. P. and Vamvakoussi, X. Greek and Flemish students' interpretation of the literal symbols as variables. Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology in Mathematics Education. Edited by: Pinto, M. M. F. and Kawasaki, T. F. pp.257-264. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME. Vol. 4
77. Verschaffel, L. and Vosniadou, S. 2004. The conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching. Special Issue. Learning and Instruction, 14
78. Vlassis, J. 2004. Making sense of the minus sign or becoming flexible in "negativity.". Learning and Instruction, 14: 469-484.
79. Vosniadou, S. 2003. "Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning". In Intentional conceptual change, Edited by: Sinatra, G. M. and Pintrich, P. R. 377-406. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80. Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X. and Skopeliti, E. 2008. "The framework theory approach to conceptual change". In Handbook of research on conceptual change, Edited by: Vosniadou, S. 3-34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81. Wagner, S. 1981. Conservation of equation and function under transformations of variables. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12: 107-118.
82. Warren, E. and Pierce, R. 2004. "A review of research in learning and teaching algebra". In Research in mathematics education in Australia 2000-2003, Edited by: Perry, P., Anthony, G. and Diezmann, C. 291-321. Flaxton, Australia: Post Pressed.