Retention of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified GIC versus composite resin adhesives-a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-14

  Mickenautsch, Steffen ^a   Yengopal, Veerasamy ^a   Banerjee, Avijit ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Composite resin; Orthodontic brackets; Orthodontic treatment; Resin modified glass ionomer cement; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DENTAL BONDING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; REVIEW;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 84855923807     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0626-8     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Barry GR (1995) A clinical investigation of the effects of pumice prophylaxis on band and bond failure. Br J Orthod 22: 245-248.
2. Bearn DR, Aird JC, McCabe JF (1995) Ex vivo bond strength of adhesive precoated metallic and ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod 22: 233-236.
3. Bin Abdullah MS, Rock WP (1996) The effect of etch time and debond interval upon the shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 23: 121-124.
4. Ozer M, Arici S (2005) Sandblasted metal brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo. Angle Orthod 75: 406-409.
5. Banerjee A, Paolinelis G, Socker M, Watson TF, McDonald F (2008) An in-vitro investigation of the effectiveness of bioactive glass air-abrasion in the selective removal of orthodontic resin adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci 116: 488-492.
6. Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S (1993) Flouride concentration in plaque adjacent to orthodontic bracket appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 27: 51-54.
7. Millett DT, McCabe JF, Bennett TG, Carter NE, Gordon PH (1995) The effect of sandblasting on the retention of first molar orthodontic bands cemented with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod 22: 161-169.
8. Millett DT, McCabe JF (1996) Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement-a review. Eur J Orthod 18: 385-399.
9. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M, Linwood NJ (1995) A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bond brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 108: 231-236.
10. Miguel JAM, Almeida MA, Chevitarese O (1995) Clinical comparison between a glass ionomer cement and a composite for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107: 484-487.
11. Foley T, Aggarwal M, Hatibovic-Kofman S (2002) A comparison of in vitro enamel demineralisation potential of three orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121: 576-580.
12. Millett DT, Glenny AM, Mattick CR, Hickman J, Mandall NA (2007) Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD004485.
13. Berger VW (2005) Selection bias and covariate imbalances in randomised clinical trials. Wiley, Chichester.
14. Berger VW, Alperson SY (2009) A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality. Rev Recent Clin Trials 4: 79-88.
15. Bax L, Yu LM, Ikeda N, Tsuruta H, Moons KGM (2006) Development and validation of MIX: comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data. BMC Med Res Methodol 6: 50.
16. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315: 629-634.
17. Thompson SG (1994) Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ 309: 1351-1355.
18. Summers A, Kao E, Gilmore J, Gunel E, Ngan P (2004) Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126: 200-206.
19. Choo SC, Ireland AJ, Sherriff M (2001) An in vivo investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenote) cements as orthodontic bonding agents. Eur J Orthod 23: 403-409.
20. Gaworski M, Weinstein M, Borislow AJ, Braitman LE (1999) Decalcification and bond failure: a comparison of a glass ionomer and a composite resin bonding system in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116: 518-521.
21. Fowler PV (1998) A twelve-month clinical trial comparing the bracket failure rates of light-cured resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive and acid-etch chemical-cured composite. Aust Orthod J 15: 186-190.
22. Fricker JP (1998) A new self-curing resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113: 384-386.
23. Wright AB, Lee RT, Lynch E, Young KA (1996) Clinical and microbiologic evaluation of a resin modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110: 469-475.
24. Fricker JP (1994) A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105: 502-505.
25. Oliveira SR, Rosenbach G, Brunhard IH, Almeida MA, Chevitarese O (2004) A clinical study of glass ionomer cement. Eur J Orthod 26: 185-189.
26. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C (1999) Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod 69: 463-469.
27. Hegarty DJ, Macfarlane TV (2002) In vivo bracket retention comparison of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based bracket adhesive system after a year. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121: 496-501.
28. Ireland AJ, Sherriff M (2002) The effect of pumicing on the in vivo use of resin modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement and a conventional no-mix composite for bonding orthodontic brackets. J Orthod 29: 217-220.
29. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B (1998) Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 1: wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res 1: 29-36.
30. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B (1999) Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2: Bonding on dry enamel and on enamel soaked with saliva. Clin Orthod Res 2: 186-193.
31. The Cochrane Collaboration (2006) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4. 2. 6. The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, pp. 97-99.
32. Bax L, Ikeda N, Fukui N, Yaju Y, Tsuruta H, Moons KG (2009) More than numbers: the power of graphs in meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 169: 249-255.
33. Chalmers TC, Matta RJ, Smith H Jr, Kunzler AM (1977) Evidence favoring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 297: 1091-1096.
34. Egger M, Jüni P, Bartlett C, Holenstein F, Sterne J (2003) How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. Health Technol Assess 7: 1-76.
35. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, Worthington HV (2008) Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4: CD001830.
36. Mickenautsch S (2010) Systematic reviews, systematic error and the acquisition of clinical knowledge. BMC Med Res Methodol 10: 53.
37. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 8: 18.