Sandblasted metal brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 406-409

  Ozer, Mete ^a   Arici, Selim ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Clinical performance; Failure rates; Resin modified glass ionomer cement; Sandblasting

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; GLASS; METAL; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS; RANDOMIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SCHOOL CHILD; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 18244391464     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hotz P, McLean JW, Seed I, Wilson AD. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates. Br Dent J. 1977;142:41-47.
2. Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Clark HE. Long term fluoride release from glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res. 1984;63:158-160.
3. Goldstein RE, Parkins FM. Air-abrasive technology: its new role in restorative dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994;125:551-557.
4. Millett D, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod. 1993;20:117-122.
5. MacColl GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;113:276-281.
6. Sonis AL. Air abrasion of failed bonded brackets: a study of shear bond strength and surface characteristics as determined by scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:96-98.
7. Grabouski JK, Staley RN, Jakobsen JR. The effect of microetching on the bond strength of metal brackets when bonded to previously bonded teeth: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:452-460.
8. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
9. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 to 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:476-483.
10. Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod. 1998;25:283-287.
11. Millet DT, Gordon PH. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a no-mix adhesive. Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:203-211.
12. Hitmi L, Muller C, Mujajic M, Attal JP. An 18-month clinical study of bond failures with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:406-415.
13. Zachrisson BU. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1977;71:173-189.
14. Lovius BB, Pender N, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light activated bonding material over an 18 month period. Br J Orthod. 1987;14:11-20.
15. O'Brien KD, Read MJF, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:348-351.
16. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:463-469.
17. Fricker JP. A new self-curing resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets in vivo. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:384-386.
18. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke R, Silverman M. A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:231-236.
19. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke R, Silverman M. A new self-curing hybrid glass ionomer. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:315-318.
20. Oliveira SR, Rosenbach G, Brunhard IHVP, Almeida MA, Chevitarese O. A clinical study of glass ionomer cement. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:185-189.
21. Summers A, Kao E, Gilmore J, Gunel E, Ngan P. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:200-206.
22. Millett DT, McCluskey LA, McAuley F, Creanor SL, Newell J, Love J. A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:233-240.