|
Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 29-36
|
Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets Part 1: Wetting with water.
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;
ALUMINUM SILICATE;
FUJI ORTHO;
GLASS IONOMER;
RESIN;
RESIN CEMENT;
SYSTEM 1 PLUS;
WATER;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CHEMISTRY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DENTAL BONDING;
EQUIPMENT;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MALOCCLUSION;
ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
WETTABILITY;
ACRYLIC RESINS;
ADULT;
ALUMINUM SILICATES;
COMPOSITE RESINS;
DENTAL BONDING;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE;
FEMALE;
GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MALOCCLUSION;
ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS;
RESIN CEMENTS;
WATER;
WETTABILITY;
|
EID: 0032130409
PISSN: 13975927
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.1998.1.1.29 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (29)
|
References (0)
|