In vivo bracket retention comparison of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based bracket adhesive system after a year

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 121, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 496-501

  Hegarty, David J ^a   Macfarlane, Tatiana V ^b  

^a Midland Health Board Dental Clinic   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; STAINLESS STEEL; FUJI II LC CEMENT; RELY A BOND SYSTEM; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMINERALIZATION; ENAMEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MECHANICS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; EQUIPMENT; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; SURVIVAL; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; RISK FACTORS; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION;

EID: 0036582079     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.122367     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ciancio SG, Cunat J, Mather ML, Harvey DH. A comparison of plaque accumulation in bonded versus banded teeth [abstract]. J Dent Res 1985;64:359.
2. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinett AJ. The effect of a fluoride program on white spot formation during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1982;81:83-98.
3. O'Reilly MM, Featherstone JBD. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:33-40.
4. Thompson RE, Way DC. Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. Am J Orthod 1981;79:282-95.
5. Diedrich P. Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: a study with the scanning electron microscope. Am J Orthod 1981;79:500-22.
6. Zachrisson BU, Årtun J. Enamel surface appearance after various debonding procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1979; 75:121-37.
7. Ostman-Andersson E, Marcusson A, Horstedt P. Comparative SEM studies of enamel surface after debonding following the use of glass ionomer cement and acrylic resins for bonding. Swed Dent J 1993;17:139-46.
8. Norevall LI, Marcusson A, Persson M. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:373-84.
9. Valk JW, Davidson CL. The relevance of controlled fluoride release with bonded orthodontic appliances. J Dent 1987;15:257-60.
10. David S. Fluoride uptake from a glass ionomer cement used as an orthodontic adhesive [abstract]. Br J Orthod 1994;21:117.
11. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G, Ekstrand J. Glass ionomer as a rechargeable fluoride system [abstract]. J Dent Res 1991;73:134.
12. Komori A, Ishikawa H. Evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for use as an orthodontic bonding agent. Angle Orthod 1997;67:189-96.
13. Miller JR, Mancl L, Arbuckle G, Baldwin J, Phillips RW. A three-year clinical trial using a glass ionomer cement for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 1996;66:309-12.
14. Cook PA. Direct bonding with glass ionomer cement. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:509-11.
15. Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Caries associated microflora in plaque from orthodontic appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:140-3.
16. Lodter C, Sarda A. Les verres ionomeresappliques au collage orthodontique. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 1991;25:263-70.
17. Millett DT, McCabe JF. Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement: a review. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:385-99.
18. Miguel JA, Almeida MA, Chevitarese O. Clinical comparison between a glass ionomer cement and a composite for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:484-7.
19. Fricker JP. A 12-month clinical evaluation of a glass polyalkenoate cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:381-4.
20. Fricker JP. A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:502-5.
21. Silverman P, Cohen M, Demke R, Silverman M. A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:231-6.
22. Silverman P, Cohen M, Demke R, Silverman M. A self-curing hybrid glass ionomer. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:315-8.
23. Fowler PV. A twelve-month clinical trial comparing the bracket failure rates of light-cured resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive and acid-etch chemical-cured adhesive. Aust Orthod J 1998;15:186-90.
24. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 1: wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:29-36.
25. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, et al. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement; an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod 1999;69:463-9.
26. Gaworski M, Weinstein M, Borislow AJ, Braitman LE. Decalcification and bond failure: a comparison of a glass ionomer and a composite resin bonding system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:518-21.
27. Andrews LF. Straight wire: the concept and appliance. San Diego (Calif): L. A. Wells; 1989.
28. SPSS for Windows. Version 9. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 1998.
29. Stata Corp. 1999 Stata Statistical Software: Version 6.0. College Station (Tex): Stata Corp; 1999.
30. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables (with discussions). J R Stat Soc 1972;34:187-220.
31. Riordan PJ, FitzGerald PEB. Outcome measures in split mouth caries trials and their statistical evaluation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994; 22: 192-197.
32. Hujoel PP. Design and analysis issues in split mouth clinical trials. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:85-6.
33. Cacciafesta V, Jost-Brinkman PG, Sussenberger U, Miethke RR. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:402-7.
34. O'Brien KD, Read MJ, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:348-51.