|
|
Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 186-193
|
|
Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2: Bonding on dry enamel and on enamel soaked with saliva.
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ACRYLIC ACID RESIN;
ALUMINUM SILICATE;
FUJI ORTHO;
GLASS IONOMER;
RESIN CEMENT;
STAINLESS STEEL;
ARTICLE;
CHEMISTRY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DENTAL BONDING;
ENAMEL;
EQUIPMENT;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MATERIALS TESTING;
ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SALIVA;
ACRYLIC RESINS;
ALUMINUM SILICATES;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL ENAMEL;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MATERIALS TESTING;
ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS;
RESIN CEMENTS;
SALIVA;
STAINLESS STEEL;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
|
EID: 0033222664
PISSN: 13975927
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.1999.2.4.186 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (26)
|
|
References (0)
|
