Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: A clinical comparison

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 177-184

  Haveman, Carl W ^a   Summitt, James B ^a   Burgess, John O ^b   Carlson, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORIDE; ANTICARIES AGENT; DENTAL ALLOY; FLUORIDE SODIUM; FLUORIDE VARNISH; GLASS IONOMER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; MOUTH HYGIENE; PHOTOGRAPHY; TOOTH; XEROSTOMIA; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; RECURRENT DISEASE; SELF CARE; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FLUORIDES, TOPICAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); ORAL HYGIENE; RECURRENCE; SELF CARE; SODIUM FLUORIDE; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; XEROSTOMIA;

EID: 0037945629     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0131     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Dodds M, Suddick R. Caries risk assessment for determination of focus and intensity of prevention in a dental school clinic. J Dent Educ 1995;59:945-56.
2. Question of the month. JADA 2001;132:1514.
3. Horiot JC, Schraub S, Bone MC, et al. Dental preservation in patients irradiated for head and neck tumours: a 10-year experience with topical fluoride and a randomized trial between two fluoridation methods. Radiother Oncol 1983;1:77-82.
4. Jansma J, Vissink A, Gravenmade EJ, Visch LL, Fidler V, Retief DH. In vivo study on the prevention of postradiation caries. Caries Res 1989;23:172-8.
5. Spak CJ, Johnson G, Ekstrand J. Caries incidence, salivary flow rate and efficacy of fluoride gel treatment in irradiated patients. Caries Res 1994;28:388-93.
6. Wood RE, Maxymiw WG, McComb D. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and sliver amalgam restorations in the treatment of class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients. Oper Dent 1993;18:94-102.
7. Burgess JO. Fluoride-releasing materials: a critical review of in vitro anti-caries effects. Proceedings of Conference on Critical Reviews of Restorative Quandaries; October 1-3, 1998; Banff, Calgary, Canada. Transactions 1998;12:151-76.
8. Forsten L. Fluoride release of glass ionomers. J Esthet Dent 1994;6:216-22.
9. Rothwell M, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. The uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste. J Dent 1998;26:591-7.
10. Gilmour AS, Edmunds DH, Newcombe RG. Prevalence and depth of artificial caries-like lesions adjacent to cavities prepared in roots and restored with a glass ionomer or a dentin-bonded composite material. J Dent Res 1997;76:1854-61.
11. Nagamine M, Itota T, Torii Y, Irie M, Staninec M, Inoue K. Effect of resin-modified glass ionomer cements on secondary caries. Am J Dent 1997;10:173-8.
12. Eichmiller FC, Marjenhoff WA. Fluoride-releasing dental restorative materials. Oper Dent 1998;23:218-28.
13. Baysan A, Lynch E, Ellwood R, Davies R, Petersson L, Borsboom P. Reversal of primary root caries using dentifrices containing 5,000 and 1,100 ppm fluoride. Caries Res 2001;35(1):41-6.
14. Mjör IA. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996;27:171-4.
15. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
16. McComb D. Caries prevention by fluoride-releasing restorative materials: a review of in-vivo evidence. Proceedings of Conference on Critical Reviews of Restorative Quandaries; October 1-3, 1998; Banff, Calgary, Canada. Transactions 1998;12:179-99.
17. Randall R, Wilson N. Glass-ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999;78:628-37.
18. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three year results. J Dent Res 1997;76:1387-96.
19. Donly KJ, Segura A, Wefel JS, Hogan MM. Evaluating the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on adjacent interproximal caries. JADA 1999;130:817-25.
20. Watson TF. A confocal microscopic study of some factors affecting the adaptation of a light-cured glass ionomer to tooth tissue. J Dent Res 1990;69:1531-8.
21. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. The effect of dehydration on light-cured glass ionomer restorations. Singapore Dent J 1994;19(special issue): 44-8.
22. de Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996;75:1613-9.