Overlaying communities and topics: An analysis on publication networks

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 499-513

  Yan, Erjia ^a   Ding, Ying ^a   Jacob, Elin K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community; Detection; Scholarly networks; Topic

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855538524     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0531-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allen, C. (2004). Life with alacrity: The Dunbar number as a limit to group sizes. Retrieved 19 April 2010 from http://www. lifewithalacrity. com/2004/03/the_dunbar_numb. html.
2. Åström, F. (2010). The visibility of information science and library science research in bibliometric mapping of the LIS field. The Library Quarterly, 80(2), 143-159.
3. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1033.
4. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J. D. (2007). A corrected model of science. Annals of Applied Statistics, 1, 17-35.
5. Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large network. Physical Review E, 70, 066111.
6. Ding, Y. (2011). Community detection: Topological vs. topical. Journal of Informetrics. doi: 10. 1016/j. joi. 2011. 02. 006.
7. Donetti, L., & Munoz, M. A. (2004). Detecting network communities: A new systematic and efficient algorithm. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2004, P10012.
8. Dunbar, R. (1998). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Boston: Harvard University Press.
9. Farkas, I., Ábel, D., Palla, G., & Vicsek, T. (2007). Weighted network modules. New Journal of Physics, 9(6), 180-209.
10. Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3-5), 75-174.
11. Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(12), 7821-7826.
12. Hofmann, T. (1999). Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 50-57), 15-19 Aug 1999, Berkeley, CA.
13. Leskovec, J., Lang, K. J., Dasgupta, A., & Mahoney, M. W. (2008). Community structure in large networks: Natural cluster sizes and the absence of large well-defined clusters. Retrieved 21 Mar 2010 from http://arxiv. org/abs/0810. 1355.
14. Li, D., He, B., Ding, Y., Tang, J., Sugimoto, C., Qin, Z., et al. (2010). Community-based topic modeling for social tagging. In The 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM2010) (pp. 1565-1568), 26-30 Oct 2010, Toronto, Canada.
15. Morris, S. A., & van der Veer Martens, B. (2008). Modeling and mapping of research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 213-295.
16. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(2), 404-409.
17. Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(23), 8577-8582.
18. Newman, M., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69, 026113.
19. Nisonger, T. E., & Davis, C. H. (2005). The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors: A replication of the Kohl-Davis study. College & Research Libraries, 66, 341-377.
20. Persson, O. (1994). The Intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38.
21. Radicchi, F., Castellano, C., Cecconi, F., Loreto, V., & Parisi, D. (2004). Defining and identifying communities in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(9), 2658-2663.
22. Richardson, T., Mucha, P. J., & Porter, M. A. (2009). Spectral tripartitioning of networks. Physical Review E, 80, 036111.
23. Steyvers, M., Smyth, P., Rosen-Zvi, M., & Griffiths, T. (2004). Probabilistic author-topic models for information discovery. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 306-315). New York: ACM Press.
24. Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., & Su, Z. (2008). ArnetMiner: Extraction and mining of academic social networks. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 990-998), Las Vegas.
25. Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635.
26. Waltman, L., Yan, E., & van Eck, N. J. (2011). A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: An application to the field of library and information science. Scientometrics, 89(1), 301-314.
27. White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(5), 423-434.
28. White, H. D., & Mccain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
29. Yan, E., Ding, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2010). Mapping library and information science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics, 83(1), 115-131.