Spectral tripartitioning of networks

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Richardson, Thomas ^a   Mucha, Peter J ^a,b   Porter, Mason A ^c  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUCKET BRIGADES; CO-AUTHORSHIP GRAPHS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURES; EIGENVECTORS; MATRIX; PARTITIONING ALGORITHMS; QUALITY FUNCTION; RECURSIVE BIPARTITIONING; SINGLE-STEP;

RECURSIVE FUNCTIONS;

EID: 70349600525     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.036111     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) 410, 268 (2001). 10.1038/35065725
2. M. E. J. Newman, SIAM Rev. 45, 167 (2003). 10.1137/S003614450342480
3. S. N. Dorogovtsev, A. V. Goltzev, and J. F. F. Mendes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1275 (2008). 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1275
4. G. Caldarelli, Scale-Free Networks: Complex Webs in Nature and Technology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007).
5. M. Newman, Phys. Today 61 (11), 33 (2008). 10.1063/1.3027989
6. S. Fortunato and C. Castellano, Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science (Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2009).
7. S. Fortunato, e-print arXiv:0906.0612.
8. S. E. Schaeffer, Comp. Sci. Rev. 1, 27 (2007). 10.1016/j.cosrev.2007.05. 001
9. M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 7821 (2002). 10.1073/pnas.122653799
10. L. Danon, A. Diaz-Guilera, J. Duch, and A. Arenas, J. Stat. Mech. (2005) P09008. 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/09/P09008
11. M. A. Porter, J.-P. Onnela, and P. J. Mucha, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 56, 1082 (2009).
12. T. Callaghan, P. J. Mucha, and M. A. Porter, Am. Math. Monthly 114, 761 (2007).
13. M. A. Porter, P. J. Mucha, M. E. J. Newman, and C. M. Warmbrand, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 7057 (2005). 10.1073/pnas.0500191102
14. M. A. Porter, P. J. Mucha, M. E. J. Newman, and A. J. Friend, Physica A 386, 414 (2007). 10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.039
15. M. A. Porter, A. J. Friend, P. J. Mucha, and M. E. J. Newman, Chaos 16, 041106 (2006). 10.1063/1.2390556
16. Y. Zhang, A. J. Friend, A. L. Traud, M. A. Porter, J. H. Fowler, and P. J. Mucha, Physica A 387, 1705 (2008). 10.1016/j.physa.2007.11.004
17. R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, and U. Alon, Science 298, 824 (2002). 10.1126/science.298.5594.824
18. R. Guimera and L. A. N. Amaral, Nature (London) 433, 895 (2005). 10.1038/nature03288
19. G. Palla, A.-L. Barabasi, and T. Vicsek, Nature (London) 446, 664 (2007). 10.1038/nature05670
20. A. L. Traud, E. D. Kelsic, P. J. Mucha, and M. A. Porter, e-print arXiv:0809.0690.
21. S. C. Johnson, Psychometrika 32, 241 (1967). 10.1007/BF02289588
22. M. E. J. Newman, Soc. Networks 27, 39 (2005). 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11. 009
23. J. P. Bagrow and E. M. Bollt, Phys. Rev. E 72, 046108 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.046108
24. G. Palla, I. Derényi, I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, Nature (London) 435, 814 (2005). 10.1038/nature03607
25. A. Clauset, Phys. Rev. E 72, 026132 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.026132
26. A. Lancichinetti, S. Fortunato, and J. Kertesz, New J. Phys. 11, 033015 (2009). 10.1088/1367-2630/11/3/033015
27. M. E. J. Newman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 8577 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0601602103
28. M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036104 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74. 036104
29. M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan, in Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks, edited by, R. Pastor-Satorras, J. Rubi, and, A. Diaz-Guilera, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003).
30. M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan, Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
31. M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066133 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.69. 066133
32. J. Reichardt and S. Bornholdt, Phys. Rev. E 74, 016110 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.016110
33. J. M. Hofman and C. H. Wiggins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 258701 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.258701
34. M. Fiedler, Czech. Math. J. 23, 298 (1973).
35. A. Pothen, H. Simon, and K. Liou, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 11, 430 (1990). 10.1137/0611030
36. A. Capocci, V. D. P. Servedio, G. Caldarelli, and F. Colaiori, Physica A 352, 669 (2005). 10.1016/j.physa.2004.12.050
37. L. Donetti and M. A. Muñoz, J. Stat. Mech. (2004) P10012. 10.1088/1742-5468/2004/10/P10012
38. U. Brandes, D. Delling, M. Gaertler, R. Goerke, M. Hoefer, Z. Nikoloski, and D. Wagner, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 20, 172 (2008). 10.1109/TKDE.2007. 190689
39. B. W. Kernighan and S. Lin, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 49, 291 (1970).
40. V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefrebvre, J. Stat. Mech. (2008) P10008. 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
41. Y. Sun, B. Danila, K. Josic, and K. E. Bassler, e-print arXiv:0901.2151.
42. K. T. Poole and H. Rosenthal, Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1997).
43. K. T. Poole, http://voteview.com
44. A. S. Waugh, L. Pei, J. H. Fowler, P. J. Mucha, and M. A. Porter, e-print arXiv:0907.3509.
45. S. Fortunato and M. Barthelemy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 36 (2007). 10.1073/pnas.0605965104
46. R. Lambiotte, J.-C. Delvenne, and M. Barahona, e-print arXiv:0812.1770.
47. A. Arenas, A. Fernandez, and S. Gómez, New J. Phys. 10, 053039 (2008). 10.1088/1367-2630/10/5/053039
48. E. A. Leicht and M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 118703 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.118703
49. G. Wang, Y. Shen, and M. Ouyang, Comput. Math. Appl. 55, 2746 (2008). 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.10.028
50. Note that our use of the term "overlap" in this specific setting is distinct from the common terminology of "overlapping communities" that allows nodes to belong to multiple groups.
51. V. A. Traag and J. Bruggeman, e-print arXiv:0811.2329, Phys. Rev. E (to be published).
52. This is the same best partition identified by restricting attention to the so-called "nonunanimous" votes, although of course the corresponding value of modularity obtained is then slightly different because the underlying edge-weight similarities are different.
53. The appearance of self-loops in the adjacency matrix A changes the optimum partition through the corresponding changes in node strengths ki and total edge weight m in the null model P.
54. A. Clauset, C. Moore, and M. E. J. Newman, Nature (London) 453, 98 (2008). 10.1038/nature06830