Mechanical properties and three-body wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials

Quintessence International

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2010, Pages e1-e10

  Schultz, Sabine ^a   Rosentritt, Martin ^b   Behr, Michael ^b   Handel, Gerhard ^b  

^a University of Regensburg ^*  (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Composite; Flowables; Fracture toughness; Hardness; Wear

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; PARTICLE SIZE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISCOSITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PARTICLE SIZE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VISCOSITY;

EID: 79951989936     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:567-577.
2. de Gee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res 1986;65:654-658.
3. ASTM. ASTM Designation: E-399-83: Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia: ASTM International, 1984:519-554.
4. Williams JG, Cawood MJ. European Group on Fracture: KC and GC methods for polymers. Polymer Testing 1990;9:15-26.
5. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Determination of changes in tooth-coloured cervical restorations in vivo using a three-dimensional laser scanning device. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:232-238.
6. Lutz F, Phillips RW, Roulet JF, Setcos JC. In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:914-920.
7. Mair LH. The measurement and analysis of clinical abrasion-A modified approach. Dent Mater 1990; 6:271-275.
8. de Gee AJ, Pallav P. Occlusal wear simulation with the ACTA wear machine. J Dent 1994;22(suppl 1):S21-S27.
9. Pallav P, DeGee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. The influence of shearing action food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites. J Dent Res 1993;72:56.
10. Finger W, Thiemann J. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo wear of posterior restorative materials. Dent Mater 1987;3:280.
11. Rosentritt M, et al. In-vitro wear of composite veneering materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002; 37:425-429.
12. Winkler MM, Greener EH, Lautenschlager EP. Nonlinear in vitro wear of posterior composite with time. Dent Mater 1991;7:258-262.
13. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Subsurface deformation associated with hardness measurements of composites. Dent Mater 1992;8:218-223.
14. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 1992; 8:305-309.
15. Braem M, et al. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 1989;5:346-349.
16. Li Y, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK, Roberts TA. Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res 1985;64:1396-1401.
17. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composites with varied cure, filler level and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997;76:1405-1411.
18. Wu D, et al. Wear resistance and mechanical properties of novel dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2002;81:A-37.
19. Pelka M, Ebert J, Schneider H, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Comparison of two-and three-body wear of glassionomers and composites. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104:132-137.
20. Ruse N, Ruse DN. What is a compomer? J Can Dent Assoc 1999;65:500-504.
21. Manhart J, et al. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16:33-40.
22. Yap AU, Ong LF, Teoh SH, Hastings GW. Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:574-580.
23. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW, Murdock CM. Localized wear of newer-generation composite resins. J Dent Res 2003;82.
24. Braem M, et al. In vivo evaluation of four posterior composites: Quantitative measurements and clinical behavior. Dent Mater 1986;2:106-113.
25. Baran G, Sadeghipour K, Jayaraman S, Silage D, Paul D, Boberick K. Crack propagation in unfilled resins. J Dent Res 1998;77:1864-1873.
26. Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G, Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites. Quintessence Int 2001;32:206-210.
27. Craig RG. Mechanical properties. In: Craig RG (ed). Restorative Dental Materials. St Louis: Mosby, 1989:75-91.
28. Ferracane JL, Antonio RC, Matsumoto H. Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composites. J Dent Res 1987;66:1140-1145.
29. Kim KH, et al. Microfracture mechanisms of dental resin composites containing spherically-shaped filler particles. J Dent Res 1994;73:499-504.
30. Kim KH, Okuno O. Microfracture behaviour of composite resins containing irregular-shaped fillers. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1153-1159.
31. Manhart J, Ilie N, Müller W, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Fracture toughness of packable and hybrid composites. J Dent Res 2001;80:224.
32. Bonilla ED, Yashar M, Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of nine flowable resin composites. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:261-267.
33. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:386-395.
34. Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Cheng YS, Douglas WH. Fracture toughness and microhardness of a composite:Do they correlate? J Dent 2003;31:89-95.
35. Attar N, Turgut MD, Gungor HC. The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites. Oper Dent 2004;29:162-167.
36. Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 2004;29:713-719.
37. Clelland NL, Pagnotto MP, Kerby RE, Seghi RR. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:153-157.