Source-constrained recall: Front-end and back-end control of retrieval quality

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-15

  Halamish, Vered ^a   Goldsmith, Morris ^a   Jacoby, Larry L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Memory; Metacognition; Recall accuracy; Source constrained retrieval

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; READING; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CUES; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855286532     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025053     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Anaki D., Henik A. Norms for semantic and associative relations in Hebrew. Norms for Hebrew words 2005, 8-16. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. A. Henik, O. Rubinstein, D. Anaki (Eds.).
2. Benjamin A.S. Memory is more than just remembering: Strategic control of encoding, accessing memory, and making decisions. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Vol. 48. Skill and strategy in memory use 2008, 175-223. Academic Press, London, England. A.S. Benjamin, B.H. Ross (Eds.).
3. Benjamin A.S., Diaz M. Measurement of relative metamnemonic accuracy. Handbook of memory and metamemory 2008, 73-94. Psychology Press, New York, NY. J. Dunlosky, R.A. Bjork (Eds.).
4. Bergerbest D., Goshen-Gottstein Y. Measures of relation between words in Hebrew association norms and their implications for memory tests. Norms for Hebrew words 2005, 83-96. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. A. Henik, O. Rubinstein, D. Anaki (Eds.).
5. Bousfield W.A., Rosner S.R. Free vs. uninhibited recall. Psychonomic Science 1970, 20:75-76.
6. Brainerd C.J., Reyna V.F., Wright R., Mojardin A.H. Recollection rejection: False-memory editing in children and adults. Psychological Review 2003, 110:762-784. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.762.
7. Burgess P.W., Shallice T. Confabulation and the control of recollection. Memory 1996, 4:359-411. doi: 10.1080/096582196388906.
8. Cohn M., Emrich S.M., Moscovitch M. Age-related deficits in associative memory: The influence of impaired strategic retrieval. Psychology and Aging 2008, 23:93-103. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.93.
9. Craik F.I.M., Lockhart R.S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 1972, 11:671-684. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X.
10. Dab S., Claes T., Morais J., Shallice T. Confabulation with a selective descriptor process impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1999, 16:215-242. doi: 10.1080/026432999380771.
11. Dodson C.S., Schacter D.L. "If I had said it I would have remembered it": Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:155-161. doi: 10.3758/BF03196152.
12. Dodson C.S., Schacter D.L. When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:782-803. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2822.
13. Faran I. Direction of relation of paired associate words. Norms for Hebrew words 2005, 67-82. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. A. Henik, O. Rubinstein, D. Anaki (Eds.).
14. Gallo D.A., Weiss J.A., Schacter D.L. Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:473-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.002.
15. Gilboa A. Strategic retrieval, confabulations and delusions: Theory and data. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2010, 15:145-180. doi: 10.1080/13546800903056965.
16. Gilboa A., Alain C., Stuss D.T., Melo B., Miller S., Moscovitch M. Mechanisms of spontaneous confabulations: A strategic retrieval account. Brain 2006, 129:1399-1414. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl093.
17. Goldsmith M., Koriat A. The strategic regulation of memory accuracy and informativeness. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Vol. 48. Skill and strategy in memory use 2008, 1-60. Academic Press, London, England. A.S. Benjamin, B.H. Ross (Eds.).
18. Goldsmith M., Koriat A., Pansky A. Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:505-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.010.
19. Goldsmith M., Koriat A., Weinberg-Eliezer A. Strategic regulation of grain size memory reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:73-95. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.73.
20. Guynn M.J. A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology 2003, 38:245-256. doi: 10.1080/00207590344000178.
21. Guynn M.J., McDaniel M.A. Generate-Sometimes recognize, sometimes not. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:398-415. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2652.
22. Hege A.C.G., Dodson C.S. Why distinctive information reduces false memories: Evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:787-795. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.787.
23. Hicks J.L., Marsh R.L. Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:1195-1209. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1195.
24. Higham P.A. Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:67-80. doi: 10.3758/BF03195266.
25. Higham P.A. No special K! A signal detection framework for the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136:1-22. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.1.
26. Higham P.A., Tam H. Generation failure: Estimating metacognition in cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:595-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.015.
27. Higham P.A., Tam H. Release from generation failure: The role of study-list structure. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:148-157. doi: 10.3758/BF03193394.
28. Jacoby L.L., Kelley C.M., Dywan J. Memory attributions. Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving 1989, 391-422. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H.L. Roediger, F.I.M. Craik (Eds.).
29. Jacoby L.L., Kelley C.M., McElree B.D. The role of cognitive control: Early selection versus late correction. Dual-process theories in social psychology 1999, 383-400. Guilford Press, New York, NY. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
30. Jacoby L.L., Shimizu Y., Daniels K.A., Rhodes M.G. Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:852-857. doi: 10.3758/BF03196776.
31. Jacoby L.L., Shimizu Y., Velanova K., Rhodes M.G. Age differences in depth of retrieval: Memory for foils. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:493-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.007.
32. Johnson M.K., Hashtroudi S., Lindsay D.S. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114:3-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3.
33. Kelley C.M., Jacoby L.L. Subjective reports and process dissociation: Fluency, knowing, and feeling. Acta Psychologica 1998, 98:127-140. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00039-5.
34. Kelley C.M., Rhodes M.G. Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment. Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 2002, 293-320. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. B.H. Ross (Ed.).
35. Koriat A., Goldsmith M. Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123:297-315. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.123.3.297.
36. Koriat A., Goldsmith M. Memory as something that can be counted versus memory as something that can be counted on. Basic and applied memory research: Vol. 2. Practical applications 1996, 3-18. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. D. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, M.K. Johnson (Eds.).
37. Koriat A., Goldsmith M. Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1996, 19:167-188. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00042114.
38. Koriat A., Goldsmith M. Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review 1996, 103:490-517. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490.
39. Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Halamish, V. (2008). Controlled processes in voluntary remembering. In J. Byrne (Series Ed.) & H. L. Roediger III (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference: Vol. 2. Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 307-324). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
40. Koriat A., Goldsmith M., Pansky A. Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology 2000, 51:481-537. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.481.
41. Koriat A., Nussinson R., Bless H., Shaked N. Information-based and experience-based metacognitive judgments: Evidence from subjective confidence. A handbook of memory and metamemory 2008, 117-135. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Dunlosky, R.A. Bjork (Eds.).
42. Koriat A., Pansky A., Goldsmith M. An output-bound perspective on false memories: The case of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork 2011, 297-328. Psychology Press, New York, NY. A.S. Benjamin (Ed.).
43. Lindsay, S. (2008). Source monitoring. In J. Byrne (Series Ed.) & H. L. Roediger III (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference: Vol. 2. Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 325-348). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
44. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
45. Mäntylä T., Nilsson L.-G. Cue distinctiveness and forgetting: Effectiveness of self-generated retrieval cues in delayed recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:502-509. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.502.
46. Marsh R.L., Meeks J.T., Cook G.I., Clark-Foos A., Hicks J.L., Brewer G.A. Retrieval constraints on the front end create differences in recollection on a subsequent test. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 61:470-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.005.
47. Masson M.E.J., Rotello C.M. Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: Implications for studies of metacognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:509-527. doi: 10.1037/a0014876.
48. McCabe D.P., Smith A.D. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall. Memory 2006, 14:570-583. doi: 10.1080/09658210600624564.
49. Mitchell K.J., Johnson M.K. Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences. The Oxford handbook of memory 2000, 179-195. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. E. Tulving, F.I.M. Craik (Eds.).
50. Moscovitch M. Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex. Neuropsychology 1994, 8:524-534. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.524.
51. Moscovitch M., Melo B. Strategic retrieval and the frontal lobes: Evidence from confabulation and amnesia. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:1017-1034. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00028-6.
52. Nairne J.S. The myth of encoding-retrieval match. Memory 2002, 10:289-395. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000216.
53. Nelson D.L., McKinney V.M., Gee N.R., Janczura G.A. Interpreting the influence of implicitly activated memories on recall and recognition. Psychological Review 1998, 105:299-324. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.299.
54. Nelson T.O. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin 1984, 95:109-133. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109.
55. Nelson T.O. Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item, not of the absolute performance on an individual item. Comments on Schraw (1995). Applied Cognitive Psychology 1996, 10:257-260. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199606)10:3<257::AID-ACP400>3.0.CO;2-9.
56. Nelson T.O., Narens L. Why investigate metacognition. Metacognition: Knowing about knowing 1994, 1-25. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J. Metcalfe, A.P. Shimamura (Eds.).
57. Norman D.A., Bobrow D.G. Descriptions: An intermediate stage in memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology 1979, 11:107-123. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90006-9.
58. Polyn S.M., Natu V.S., Cohen J.D., Norman K.A. Category-specific cortical activity precedes retrieval during memory search. Science 2005, 310:1963-1966. doi: 10.1126/science.1117645.
59. Rajaram S., Srinivas K., Roediger H.L. A transfer-appropriate processing account of context effects in word-fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:993-1004. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.993.
60. Reiser B.J., Black J.B., Kalamarides P. Strategic memory search processes. Autobiographical memory 1986, 100-121. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511558313.011. D.C. Rubin (Ed.).
61. Rhodes M.G., Kelley C.M. Executive processes, memory accuracy, and memory monitoring: An aging and individual difference analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52:578-594. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.014.
62. Roebers C.M. Confidence judgments in children's and adults' event recall and suggestibility. Developmental Psychology 2002, 38:1052-1067. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.1052.
63. Roediger H.L. Memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language 1996, 35:76-100. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0005.
64. Roediger H.L., McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:803-814. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803.
65. Rubinstein O., Anaki D., Henik A., Drori S., Faran I. Free associations norms in Hebrew. Norms for Hebrew words 2005, 17-34. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. A. Henik, O. Rubinstein, D. Anaki (Eds.).
66. Rugg M.D., Allan K., Birch C.S. Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:664-678. doi: 10.1162/089892900562291.
67. Rugg M.D., Wilding E.L. Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:108-115. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01445-5.
68. Schacter D.L., Israel L., Racine C. Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:1-24. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2611.
69. Schacter D.L., Norman D.A., Koutstaal W. The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. Annual Review of Psychology 1998, 49:289-318. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.289.
70. Schraw G. A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning 2009, 4:33-45. doi: 10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3.
71. Shallice T. Deconstructing retrieval mode. Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging: Essays in honour of Fergus Craik 2001, 124-134. Psychological Press, New York, NY. M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, H.L. Roediger (Eds.).
72. Shimizu Y., Jacoby L.L. Similarity-guided depth of retrieval: Constraining at the front end. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2005, 59:17-21. doi: 10.1037/h0087455.
73. Smith S.M. Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1979, 5:460-471. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.5.5.460.
74. Tulving E. Elements of episodic memory 1983, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
75. Wahlheim C.N., Jacoby L.L. Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: Mechanisms of change. Memory & Cognition 2011, 39:185-195. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0017-4.
76. Watkins O.C., Watkins M.J. Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1975, 1:442-452. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.1.4.442.
77. Weldon M.S., Colston H.L. Dissociating the generation stage in implicit and explicit memory tests: Incidental production can differ from strategic access. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1995, 2:381-386. doi: 10.3758/BF03210976.
78. Whittlesea B.W.A. Production, evaluation, and preservation of experiences: Constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory 1997, 211-264. Academic Press, New York, NY. D.L. Medin (Ed.).
79. Whittlesea B.W.A. Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:325-348. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.325.
80. Williams M.D., Hollan J.D. The process of retrieval from very long-term memory. Cognitive Science 1981, 5:87-119. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_1.
81. Yaniv I., Yates J.F., Smith J.E.K. Measures of discrimination skill in probabilistic judgment. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 110:611-617. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.611.
82. Yates J.F. Judgment and decision making 1990, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.