Release from generation failure: The role of study list structure

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 148-157

  Higham, Philip A ^a   Tam, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; RECALL; TASK PERFORMANCE; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; LONG TERM MEMORY; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PSYCHOANALYSIS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

CUES; FREE ASSOCIATION; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 33745937394     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193394     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. HIGHAM, P. A. (2002). Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited. Memory & Cognition, 30, 67-80.
2. HIGHAM, P. A., & BROOKS, L. R. (1997). Learning the experimenter's design: Tacit sensitivity to the structure of memory lists. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 199-215.
3. HIGHAM, P. A., & GERRARD, C. (2005). Not all errors are created equal: Metacognition and changing answers on multiple-choice tests. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 28-34.
4. HIGHAM, P. A., & TAM, H. (2005). Generation failure: Estimating metacognition in cued recall. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 595-617.
5. HIGHAM, P. A., & VOKEY, J. R. (2004). Illusory recollection and dualprocess models of recognition memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 714-744.
6. KELLEY, C. M., & SAHAKYAN, L. (2003). Memory, monitoring, and control in the attainment of memory accuracy. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 704-721.
7. KORIAT, A. (2000). Control processes in remembering. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 333-346). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. KORIAT, A., & GOLDSMITH, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517.
9. KUHN, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. LIGHT, L. L., & CARTER-SOBELL, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 1-11.
11. MURPHY, M. D., & WALLACE, W. P. (1974). Encoding specificity: Semantic change between storage and retrieval cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 768-774.
12. NILSSON, L.-G., & GARDINER, J. M. (1993). Identifying exceptions in a database of recognition failure studies from 1973 to 1992. Memory & Cognition, 21, 397-410.
13. RAJARAM, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
14. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & ADELSON, B. (1980). Semantic specificity in cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 8, 65-74.
15. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & PAYNE, D. G. (1983). Superiority of free recall to cued recall with "strong" cues. Psychological Research, 45, 275-286.
16. SANTA, J. L., & LAMWERS, L. L. (1974). Encoding specificity: Fact or artifact? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 412-423.
17. SCHOOLER, J. W., DOUGAL, S., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1998, November). The self-discovery effect: When solving is confused with remembering. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas.
18. THOMSON, D. M., & TULVING, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 255-262.
19. TULVING, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1-12.
20. TULVING, E., & THOMSON, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
21. VOKEY, J. R., & HIGHAM, P. A. (2005). Components of recall: The semantic specificity effect and the monitoring of cued recall. Unpublished manuscript.
22. WERTHEIMER, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Row.
23. ZEELENBERG, R. (2005). Encoding specificity manipulations do affect retrieval from memory. Acta Psychologica, 119, 107-201.