Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 6, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 870-881

  Renkewitz, Frank ^a   Fuchs, Heather M ^a   Fiedler, Susann ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Funnel plot; Meta analysis; Publication bias; SVO

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855227652     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 292-303.
2. Balliet, D., Parks, C., & Joireman, J. (2009). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 533-547.
3. Becker, B. (2005). Failsafe N or file-drawer number. In H. Rothstein, A. Sutton & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 111-126). Chichester: Wiley.
4. Begg, C., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 1088-1101.
5. Borenstein, M. (2005). Software for publication bias. In H. Rothstein, A. Sutton & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 193-220). Chichester: Wiley.
6. Christensen-Szalanski, J., & Fobian Willham, C. (1991). The hindsight bias: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 147-168.
7. Cooper, H., DeNeve, K., & Charlton, K. (1997). Finding the missing science: The fate of studies submitted for review by a human subjects committee. Psychological Methods, 2, 447-452.
8. Covey, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of the effects of presenting treatment benefits in different formats. Medical Decision Making, 27, 638-654.
9. Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2001). A primer on the understanding, use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 530-572.
10. Dato-on, M., & Dahlstrom, R. (2003). A meta-analytic investigation of contrast effects in decision making. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 707-731.
11. Dickersin, K. (1997). How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Education and Prevention, 9, 15-21.
12. Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586-598.
13. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M., Nordgren, L., & Van Baaren, R. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005-1007.
14. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95-109.
15. Duval, S. (2005). The trim-and-fill method. In H. Rothstein, A. Sutton & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 127-144). Chichester: Wiley.
16. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000a). A nonparametric"trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89-98.
17. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000b). Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463.
18. Egger, M., Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British medical journal, 315, 629-634.
19. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160
20. Fiedler, K. (2011). Voodoo correlations are everywherenot only in neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 163-171.
21. Greenwald, A., Poehlman, T., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41.
22. Greenwald, A. G. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1-12.
23. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis Academic Press New York.
24. Higgins, J., & Green, S. (2009). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions New York: Wiley.
25. Hilbig, B. E. (2010). Reconsidering evidence for fastand-frugal heuristics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 923-930.
26. Hogarth, R., & Karelaia, N. (2007). Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments. Psychological Review, 114, 733-758.
27. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2, e124.
28. Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2007). An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clinical Trials, 4, 245-253.
29. Iyengar, S., & Greenhouse, J. (1988). Selection models and the file drawer problem. Statistical Science, 3, 109-117.
30. Karelaia, N., & Hogarth, R. (2008). Determinants of linear judgment: A meta-analysis of lens model studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 404-426.
31. Kaufmann, E., & Athanasou, J. (2009). A Meta Analysis of Judgment Achievement as Defined by the Lens Model Equation. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 68, 99-112.
32. Kühberger, A. (1998). The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
33. Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. F. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.
34. Liebrand, W. B. G., & McClintock, C. G. (1988). The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation. European Journal of Personality, 2, 217-230.
35. Light, R., & Pillemer, D. (1984). Summing up: the science of reviewing research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
36. Macaskill, P., Walter, S., & Irwig, L. (2001). A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 641-654.
37. Messick, D., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational Bases of Choice in Experimental Games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
38. Moreno, S., Sutton, A., Ades, A., Stanley, T., Abrams, K., Peters, J., & Cooper, N. (2009). Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study. BMC medical research methodology, 9, 2-20.
39. Orwin, R. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in metaanalysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 157-159.
40. Palmer, A. (2000). Quasireplication and the contract of error: lessons from sex ratios, heritabilities and fluctuating asymmetry. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 441-480.
41. Peters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2008). Contour-enhanced metaanalysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 991-996.
42. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological bulletin, 86, 638-641.
43. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237.
44. Schooler, J. (2011). Unpublished results hide the decline effect. Nature, 470, 437.
45. Schwenk, C. (1990). Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 161-176.
46. Spengler, P., White, M., Ægisdóttir, S., Maugherman, A., Anderson, L., Cook, R., et al. (2009). The metaanalysis of clinical judgment project. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 350-382.
47. Sterne, J., Becker, B., & Egger, M. (2005). The funnel plot. In H. Rothstein, A. Sutton & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 75-98). Chichester: Wiley.
48. Sterne, J., & Egger, M. (2001). Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 1046-1055.
49. Sterne, J., & Egger, M. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In H. R. Rothstein, A. Sutton & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 99-110). Chichester: Wiley.
50. Sterne, J., Gavaghan, D., & Egger, M. (2000). Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 1119-1129.
51. Sutton, A. (2005). Evidence concerning the consequences of publication and related biases. In H. Rothstein, A. Sutton & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis-Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. (pp. 175-192). Chichester: Wiley.
52. Sutton, A., Duval, S., Tweedie, R., Abrams, K., & Jones, D. (2000). Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 320, 1574-1577.
53. Thompson, L., & Hrebec, D. (1996). Lose-lose agreements in interdependent decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 396-409.
54. Thornton, W., & Dumke, H. (2005). Age differences in everyday problem-solving and decision-making effectiveness: A meta-analytic review. Psychology and Aging, 20, 85-99.
55. Turner, E. H., Matthews, A. M., Linardatos, E., Tell, R. A. & Rosenthal, R. (2008). Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 252-260.
56. Van Lange, P., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N., & Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733-746.