Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 69, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2009, Pages 645-653

  Lieberman, David A ^a   Faigel, Douglas O ^a   Logan, Judith R ^a   Mattek, Nora ^a   Holub, Jennifer ^a   Eisen, Glenn ^a   Morris, Cynthia ^a   Smith, Robert ^a   Nadel, Marion ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CECUM; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMORBIDITY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 61549137140     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.034     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Cram P., Fendrick A.M., Inadomi J., et al. The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med 163 (2003) 1601-1605
2. Harewood G.C., and Lieberman D.A. Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of Medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenteral Hepatol 2 (2004) 72-77
3. Lieberman D.A., Holub J., Eisen G., et al. Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 62 (2005) 875-883
4. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97 (2002) 1296-1308
5. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 63 Suppl 4 (2006) S16-S28
6. Lieberman D., Nadel M., Smith R., et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system (CO-RADS): report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 757-766
7. Winawer S., Fletcher R., Rex D., et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124 (2003) 544-560
8. Schatzkin A., Lanza E., Corle D., et al. Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 342 (2000) 1149-1155
9. Alberts D.S., Martinez M.E., Roe D.J., et al. Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 342 (2000) 1156-1162
10. Robertson D.J., Greenberg E.R., Beach M., et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 129 (2005) 34-41
11. Bertagnolli M.M., Eagle C.J., Zauber A.G., et al. Celecoxib for the prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 873-884
12. Arber N., Eagle C.J., Spicak J., et al. Celecoxib for the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polyps. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 885-895
13. Pabby A., Schoen R.E., Weissfeld J.L., et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary polyp prevention trial. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 385-391
14. Sawney M.S., Farrar W.D., Gudiseva S., et al. Microsatellite instability in interval colon cancers. Gastroenterology 131 (2006) 1700-1705
15. Pickhardt P.J., Choi R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
16. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms. JAMA 291 (2004) 1713-1719
17. Rockey D.C., Paulson E., Niedzwiecki D., et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365 (2005) 305-311
18. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Adenoma detection rates and colonoscopic withdrawal times during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2533-2541
19. American College of Radiology: Bi-RADS atlas: breast imaging and reporting data system. 4th ed (2003), American College of Radiology, Reston (Va)
20. Zalis M.E., Barish M.A., Choi J.R., et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236 (2005) 3-9
21. Mysliwiec P.A., Brown M.L., Klabunde C.N., et al. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 141 (2004) 264-271
22. Boolchand V., Olds G., Singh J., et al. Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Ann Intern Med 145 (2006) 654-659
23. Prause G., Ratzenhofer-Comenda B., Pierer G., et al. Can ASA grade or Goldman's cardiac risk index predict peri-operative mortality? A study of 16,227 patients. Anesthesia 52 (1997) 203-206
24. Vargo J.J., Holub J.L., Faigel D.O., et al. Risk factors for cardiopulmonary events during propofol-mediated upper endoscopy and colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24 (2006) 955-963
25. Sharma V.K., Nguyen C.C., Crowell M., et al. A national study of cardiopulmonary complications following gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 66 (2007) 27-34
26. Seeff L.C., Richards T.B., Shapiro J.A., et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 127 (2004) 1670-1677
27. Brown M.L., Klabunde C.N., and Mysliwiec P. Current capacity for endoscopic colorectal cancer screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute survey of colorectal cancer screening practices. Am J Med 115 (2003) 129-133
28. Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Bond J.H., et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343 (2000) 162-168
29. Imperiale T.F., Wagner D.R., Lin C.Y., et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 343 (2000) 169-174
30. Schoenfeld P., Cash B., Flood A., et al. Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med 352 (2005) 2061-2068
31. Regula J., Rupinski M., Kraszewska E., et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 1863-1872
32. Nelson D.B., McQuaid K.R., Bond J.H., et al. Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002) 307-314
33. Korman L.Y., Overholt B.F., Box T., et al. Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003) 554-557
34. Ko C.W., Riffle S., Shapiro J.A., et al. Incidence of minor complications and time lost from normal activities after screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 65 (2007) 648-656
35. Levin T.R., Zhao W., Conell C., et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 145 (2006) 880-886
36. Ko C.W., Riffle S., Morris C., et al. Complications after screening and surveillance colonoscopy. [abstract]. Gastroenterology 132 (2007) A149
37. Klabunde C., Warren J., Ransohoff D.F., et al. Complications of colonoscopy in the Medicare population. [abstract]. Gastroenterology 132 (2007) A149