Looking over your shoulder during colonoscopy: Potential roles for videorecording colonoscopy withdrawals

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 134-137

  Rex, Douglas K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCREENING; SKILL; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 84855171330     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.025     Document Type: Editorial

References (30)

1. D.K. Rex, J.L. Petrini, T.H. Baron Quality indicators for colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 873 885
2. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, A.S. Doughty Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541 (Pubitemid 44917501)
3. S.C. Chen, D.K. Rex Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 856 861 (Pubitemid 46496608)
4. T.F. Imperiale, E.A. Glowinski, B.E. Juliar Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 69 2009 1288 1295
5. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, S. Winawer Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1296 1308 (Pubitemid 34664769)
6. D.K. Rex, C.C. Helbig High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging Gastroenterology 133 2007 42 47 (Pubitemid 47031129)
7. C.J. Kahi, J.C. Anderson, I. Waxman High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 1301 1307
8. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, E. Kraszewska Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
9. W. Sanchez, G.C. Harewood, B.T. Petersen Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 1941 1945 (Pubitemid 39421236)
10. H. Fatima, D.K. Rex, R. Rothstein Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 2008 109 114 (Pubitemid 50008421)
11. D.K. Rex Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates Gastrointest Endosc 51 2000 33 36 (Pubitemid 30051607)
12. D.K. Rex, D.G. Hewett, M. Raghavendra The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 2312 2317
13. R.H. Lee, R.S. Tang, V.R. Muthusamy Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos) Gastrointest Endosc 74 2011 128 134
14. D.A. Corley, C.D. Jensen, A.R. Marks Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 656 665
15. C. Almansa, M.W. Shahid, M.G. Heckman Association between visual gaze patterns and adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a preliminary investigation Am J Gastroenterol 106 2011 1070 1074
16. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, R.L. Greenlaw Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 2008 1091 1098
17. D.K. Rex, E.Y. Rahmani, J.H. Haseman Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice Gastroenterology 112 1997 17 23 (Pubitemid 27008980)
18. L. Rabeneck, L.F. Paszat, R. Saskin Endoscopist specialty is associated with incident colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8 2010 275 279
19. H. Singh, Z. Nugent, A.A. Demers The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer Gastroenterology 139 2010 1128 1137
20. D.K. Rex Update on colonoscopic imaging and projections for the future Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8 2010 318 321
21. A. Adler, H. Pohl, I.S. Papanikolaou A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut 57 2008 59 64
22. M.F. Madhoun, W.M. Tierney The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate Gastrointest Endosc 75 2012 127 133
23. J.L. Lane, R.P. Gottlieb Improving the interviewing and self-assessment skills of medical students: is it time to readopt videotaping as an educational tool? Ambul Pediatr 4 2004 244 248 (Pubitemid 38779943)
24. C. Jiang, Y. Zhao, Z. Chen Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department by real-time video recording and regular feedback learning Resuscitation 81 2010 1664 1669
25. P.H. Lubbert, E.G. Kaasschieter, L.E. Hoorntje Video registration of trauma team performance in the emergency department: the results of a 2-year analysis in a Level 1 trauma center J Trauma 67 2009 1412 1420
26. S.Y. Nakada, S.P. Hedican, J.T. Bishoff Expert videotape analysis and critiquing benefit laparoscopic skills training of urologists JSLS 8 2004 183 186
27. J.R. Duncan, B. Kline, C.B. Glaiberman Analysis of simulated angiographic procedures Part 2: extracting efficiency data from audio and video recordings J Vasc Interv Radiol 18 2007 535 544 (Pubitemid 46552258)
28. A.J. Byrne, A.J. Sellen, J.G. Jones Effect of videotape feedback on anaesthetists' performance while managing simulated anaesthetic crises: a multicentre study Anaesthesia 57 2002 176 179 (Pubitemid 34149956)
29. D.K. Rex Considering double contrast barium enema and its demise: a case for systematic videorecording of colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 103 2008 3149 3151
30. R.P. Marcus Admissibility and effects of videotapes of medical procedures in litigation J Leg Med 22 2001 401 429 (Pubitemid 32929627)