Association between visual gaze patterns and adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: A preliminary investigation

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1070-1074

  Almansa, Cristina ^a   Shahid, Muhammad W ^a   Heckman, Michael G ^a   Preissler, Susan ^a   Wallace, Michael B ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRELIMINARY COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDENT T TEST; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADENOMA; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLING STUDIES; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 79958017560     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.26     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pradhan AK, Pollatsek A, Knodler M et al. Can younger drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their risk in roadway traffic scenarios that are hard to identify as hazardous? Ergonomics 2009; 52: 657-73.
2. Martell SG, Vickers JN. Gaze characteristics of elite and near-elite athletes in ice hockey defensive tactics. Hum Mov Sci 2004; 22: 689-712. (Pubitemid 38404807)
3. Underwood G. Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver. Ergonomics 2007; 50: 1235-49. (Pubitemid 46930110)
4. Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Mello-Th oms C et al. How experience and training influence mammography expertise. Acad Radiol 1999; 6: 575-85. (Pubitemid 32674933)
5. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Conant EF et al. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology 2007; 242: 396-402. (Pubitemid 46146192)
6. Aggarwal R, Leong J, Leff D et al. New technologies for the surgical curriculum. World J Surg 2008; 32: 213-6.
7. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colono scopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-803.
8. Singh H, Singh G. Inequities in colonoscopy: variation in performance and outcomes of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1296-8.
9. Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG et al. High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 364-70.
10. Mobile Eye Operation Manual. In: Manual Version 1.33 edn, Applied Science Laboratories: Bedford, MA.
11. Vicari J. Performing a quality colonoscopy: just slow down!. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 787-8.
12. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 1-8.
13. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296-308. (Pubitemid 34664769)
14. Rex DK. Who is the best colonoscopist? Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65 : 145-50. (Pubitemid 44917998)
15. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1288-95.
16. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy . Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 1091-8.
17. Nodine CF, Mello-Th oms C, Weinstein SP et al. Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: an eye-position analysis. Radiology 2001; 221: 122-9. (Pubitemid 32880379)
18. Meining A, Atasoy S, Chung A et al. " Eye-tracking " for assessment of image perception in gastrointestinal endoscopy with narrow-band imaging compared with white-light endoscopy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 652-5.
19. Fehd HM, Seiffert AE. Eye movements during multiple object tracking: where do participants look? Cognition 2008; 108: 201-9.
20. Fehd HM, Seiffert AE. Looking at the center of the targets helps multiple object tracking. J Vis 2010; 10: 19.1-19.13.
21. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Schneck ME, Brabyn JA. Seeing into old age: vision function beyond acuity. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 141-58. (Pubitemid 29171973)
22. Collins MJ, Brown B, Bowman KJ. Peripheral visual acuity and age. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 314-6. (Pubitemid 19195084)
23. Atkin W, Rogers P, Cardwell C et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 1247-56. (Pubitemid 38552789)