The role of haptic feedback when manipulating nonrigid objects

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 433-441

  Danion, Frédéric ^a   Diamond, Jonathan S ^b   Flanagan, J Randall ^b,c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Human; Motor learning; Object manipulation; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

ADULT; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROFEEDBACK; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84255167162     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00738.2011     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Basafa E, Farahmand F. Real-time simulation of the nonlinear visco-elastic deformations of soft tissues. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6: 297-307, 2010.
2. Blakemore SJ, Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM. Predicting the consequences of our own actions: the role of sensorimotor context estimation. J Neurosci 18: 7511-7518, 1998.
3. Danion F, Sarlegna FR. Can the human brain predict the consequences of arm movement corrections when transporting an object? Hints from grip force adjustments. J Neurosci 27: 12839-12843, 2007.
4. Davidson PR, Wolpert DM. Scaling down motor memories: de-adaptation after motor learning. Neurosci Lett 370: 102-107, 2004.
5. Dingwell JB, Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Experimentally confirmed mathematical model for human control of a non-rigid object. J Neurophysiol 91: 1158-1170, 2004.
6. Dingwell JB, Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Manipulating objects with internal degrees of freedom: evidence for model-based control. J Neurophysiol 88: 222-235, 2002.
7. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433, 2002.
8. Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 162-169, 2004.
9. Flanagan JR, Bowman MC, Johansson RS. Control strategies in object manipulation tasks. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16: 650-659, 2006.
10. Flanagan JR, Vetter P, Johansson RS, Wolpert DM. Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol 13: 146-150, 2003.
11. Flanagan JR, Wing AM. Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements. Exp Brain Res 95: 131-143, 1993.
12. Flanagan JR, Wing AM. The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of handheld loads. J Neurosci 17: 1519, 1997.
13. Flanagan JR, Wing AM. The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load. Exp Brain Res 105: 455-464, 1995.
14. Huang FC, Gillespie RB, Kuo AD. Human adaptation to interaction forces in visuo-motor coordination. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14: 390-397,2006.
15. Huang FC, Gillespie RB, Kuo AD. Visual and haptic feedback contributeto tuning and online control during object manipulation. J Mot Behav 39: 179-193, 2007.
16. Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 345-359, 2009.
17. Lim YJ, Deo D, Singh TP, Jones DB, De S. In situ measurement and modeling of biomechanical response of human cadaveric soft tissues for physics-based surgical simulation. Surg Endosc 23: 1298-1307, 2009.
18. Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Evidence for a specific internal representation of motion-force relationships during object manipulation. Biol Cybern 88: 60-72, 2003.
19. Mehta B, Schaal S. Forward models in visuomotor control. J Neurophysiol 88: 942-953, 2002.
20. Nagengast AJ, Braun DA, Wolpert DM. Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000419, 2009.
21. Panait L, Akkary E, Bell RL, Roberts KE, Dudrick SJ, Duffy AJ. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. J Surg Res 156: 312-316, 2009.
22. Shadmehr R, Brandt J, Corkin S. Time-dependent motor memory processes in amnesic subjects. J Neurophysiol 80: 1590-1597, 1998.
23. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci 33: 89-108, 2010.
24. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4: e179, 2006.
25. Sternad D, Duarte M, Katsumata H, Schaal S. Bouncing a ball: tuning into dynamic stability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27: 1163-1184, 2001.
26. Ström P, Hedman L, Särna L, Kjellin A, Wredmark T, Felländer-Tsai L. Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents. Surg Endosc 20: 1383-1388, 2006.
27. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12: 834-837, 2002.
28. van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surg Endosc 23: 1180-1190, 2009.
29. Westling G, Johansson RS. Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53: 277-284, 1984.
30. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11: R729-R732, 2001.
31. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3: 1212-1217, 2000.