In situ measurement and modeling of biomechanical response of human cadaveric soft tissues for physics-based surgical simulation

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1298-1307

  Lim, Yi Je ^a   Deo, Dhanannjay ^b   Singh, Tejinder P ^c   Jones, Daniel B ^d   De, Suvranu ^b  

^a Energid Systems   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^d BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanical properties; Human cadaver; Indentation experiments; Soft tissue; Surgical simulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEALTH PHYSICS; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVER; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SOFT TISSUE; STOMACH; VELOCITY; VISCOELASTICITY; ABDOMEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; ELASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; SURGERY; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISCOSITY;

ABDOMEN; CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 68849088548     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0154-z     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Mack MJ (2001) Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 385(5):568-572
2. Basdogan C, Ho C, Srinivasan MA (2001) Virtual environments for medical training: graphical and haptic simulation of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 6(3):269-285
3. Satava RM, Jones SB (1997) Virtual environments for medical training and education. Presence 6(2):139-146
4. Tendick F, Downes M, Goktekin T, Cavusoglu MC, Feygin D, Wu X, Eyal R, Hegarty M, Way LW (2000) A virtual environment testbed for training laparoscopc surgical skill. Presence 9(3):236-255
5. Srinivasan MA, Basdogan C (1997) Haptics in virtual environments: taxonomy, research status, and challenges. Comput Graph 21(4):393-404
6. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, OrsquoBrien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458-464
7. Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 189:349-355
8. Picod G, Jambon AC, Vinatier D, Dubois P (2005) What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 19(1):95-100
9. Lamata P, Gómez E, Sánchez-Margallo F, Lamata F, Pozo F, Usón J (2006) Tissue consistency perception in laparoscopy to define the level of fidelity in virtual reality simulation. Surg Endosc 20(9):1368-1375
10. Cao CGL, Zhou M, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg SD (2007) Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time? J Gastrointest Surg 11:1564-1569
11. Fung YC (1993) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany
12. Yamada H (1970) Strength of biological materials. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
13. Schwartz J-M, Denninger M, Rancourt D, Moisan C, Laurendeau D (2005) Modeling liver tissue properties using a non-linear visco-elastic model for surgery simulation. Med Image Anal 9(2):103-112
14. Roan E, Vemaganti K (2007) The nonlinear material properties of liver tissue determined from no-slip uniaxial compression experiments. J Biomech Eng 129(3):450-456
15. Kim SM, McCulloch TM, Rim K (1999) Comparison of viscoelastic properties of the pharyngeal tissue: human and canine. Dysphagia 14:8-16
16. Gerad JM, Ohayon J, Luboz V, Perrier P, Payan Y (2005) Nonlinear elastic properties of the lingual and facial tissues assessed by indentation technique Application to the biomechanics of speech production. Med Eng Phys 27:884-892
17. Samur E, Sedef M, Basdogan C, Avtan L, Duzgun O (2007) A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue behavior. Med Image Anal 11(4): 361-373
18. Mazza E, Nava A, Bauer M, Winter R, Bajka M, Holzapfel A (2006) Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal 10(2):125-136
19. Tay BK, Kim J, Srinivasan MA (2006) In vivo mechanical behavior of intra-abdominal organs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(11):2129-2138
20. Kim J, Srinivasan MA (2005) Characterization of viscoelastic soft tissue properties from in vivo animal experiments and inverse FE parameter estimation. MICCAI 3750:599-606
21. Ottensmeyer MP (2002) In vivo measurement of solid organ viscoelastic properties. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality. Studies Health Technol Inform 85:328-333
22. Tay B, De S, Srinivasan MA (2002) In vivo force response of intra-abdominal soft tissues for the simulation of laparoscopic procedures, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: 10, Newport Beach, January
23. Ehman RL, Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Riederer SJ (1995) Magnetoelastography MRI of acoustic strain waves. Radiology 179:335
24. Gao L, Parker KJ, Lerner RM, Levinson SF (1996) Imaging of the elastic properties of tissue - a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 22(8):959-977
25. Loomis JM, Lederman SJ (1986) Tactual perception. In: Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance. Wiley, New York, pp 31-41
26. Miller K, Chinzei K, Orssengo G, Bednarz P (2000) Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. J Biomech 33:1369-1376
27. Zheng YP, Mak A (1996) An ultrasound indentation system for bio-mechanical properties assessment of soft tissues in vivo. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43(9):912-918
28. Zheng YP, Mak A (1999) Effective elastic properties for lower limb soft tissues from manual indentation experiment. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 7:257-267
29. Scilingo EP, DeRossi D, Bicchi A, Iacconi P (1997) Haptic display for replication of rheological behavior of surgical tissues: modelling, control, and experiments. Proc ASME Dyn Syst Control Div 173-176
30. Brown JD, Rosen J, Moreyra M, Sinanan M, Hannaford B (2002) Computer-controlled motorized endoscopic grasper for in vivo measurements of soft tissue biomechanical characteristics. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 85:71-73
31. Aoki T, Ohashi T, Matsumoto T, Sato M (1997) The pipette aspiration applied to the local stiffness measurement of soft tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 25:581-587
32. Kauer M, Vuskovic V et al (2002) Inverse finite element characterization of soft tissues. Med Image Anal 6(3):275-287
33. Hannaford B, Trujillo J, Sinanan M, Moreya M, Rosen J, Brown J, Leuschke R, MacFarlane M (1998) Computerized Endoscopic Surgical Grasper. Proceedings of MMVR Conference 1998 265-271
34. Torres-Moreno R (1991) Biomechanical analysis of the interaction between the above-knee residual limb and the prosthetic socket. PhD dissertation. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
35. Huwart L, Peeters F, Sinkus R, Annet L, Salameh N, ter Beek LC, Horsmans Y (2006) Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography. NMR Biomed 19(2):173-179
36. De S, Lim Y-J, Muniyandi M, Srinivasan MA (2006) Physically realistic virtual surgery using the point-associated finite field (PAFF) approach. Presence 15(3):294-308
37. Lim Y-J, De S (2007) Real time simulation of nonlinear tissue response in virtual surgery using the point collocation-based method of finite spheres. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(31-32):3011-3024
38. Banihani S, De S. A comparison of some model order reduction methods for fast simulation of soft tissue response using the point collocation-based method of finite spheres (PCMFS) Engineering with Computers (in press)
39. Hayes WC, Keer LM, Herrmann G, Mockros LF (1972) A mathematical analysis for indentation tests of articular cartilage. J Biomech 5:541-51
40. Johnson GA, Liversay GA, Woo SL, Rajagopal KR (1996) A single integral finite strain viscoelastic model of ligaments and tendons. J Biomech Eng 118:221-226
41. Carew EO, Talman EA, Boughner DR, Vesely I (1999) Quasilinear viscoelastic theory applied to internal shearing of porcine aortic valve leaflets. J Biomech Eng 121:386-392
42. Shames IH, Cozzarelli FA (1997) Elastic and inelastic stress analysis. Taylor and Francis, Bristol, PA, USA
43. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1992) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
44. Rivlin RS (1948) Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials - further developments of the general theory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 241:379
45. Ogden RW (1972) Large deformation isotropic elasticity - correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 326:565
46. Yeoh OH (1993) Some forms of the strain-energy function for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 66:754
47. Viidik A, Vuust J (1978) Biology of collagen: proceedings of a symposium. Academic, Aarhus, London
48. Egorov IE, Schastlivtsev IV, Prut EV, Baranov AO, Turusov RO (2002) Mechanical properties of the human gastrointestinal tract. J Biomech 35:1417-1425