Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: A prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1383-1388

  Strom P ^a   Hedman, L ^a,b   Sarna L ^a   Kjellin, A ^a   Wredmark, T ^a   Fellander Tsai L ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Haptic feedback; Image guided surgery; Simulation; Virtual reality; Visual spatial ability

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BASIQ TEST; COGNITION; DIATHERMY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL ROTATION TEST A; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SKILL; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TEACHING MATERIALS; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33749013602     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0545-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ackerman PL (1992) Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: dynamics of ability determinants. J Appl Psychol 77: 598-614
2. Basdogan C, De S, Kim J, Muniyandi M, Kim H, Srinivasan MA (2004) Haptics in minimally invasive surgical simulation and training. IEEE Computer Graphics Applications 24: 56-64
3. Berkley J, Turkiyyah G, Berg D, Ganter M, Weghorst S (2004) Real-time finite element modeling for surgery simulation: an application to virtual suturing. IEEE Transact Visualization Computer Graphics 10: 314-325
4. Bethea BT, Okamura AM, Kitagawa M, Fitton TP, Cattaneo SM, Gott VL, Baumgartner WA, Yuh DD (2004) Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14: 191-195
5. Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Kutz RH, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM (1999) Defining the role of haptic feedback in minimally invasive surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 62: 62-66
6. Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 189: 349-355
7. Biggs SJ, Srinivasan MA (2002) Haptic interfaces. In: Stanney KM (ed). Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 93-115
8. Borg G (1998) Borǵs perceived exertion and pain scales. In: Cotton RT (ed) Human kinetics. Champaign, IL, pp 30-67
9. Burdea CG, Coiffet P (1994) Virtual reality technology. John Wiley & Sons, New York
10. Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper/Collins, New York, pp 1-49
11. Darzi A (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 14: 999-1004
12. Darzi A, Mackay S (2001) Assessment of surgical competence. Qual Health Care 10(Suppl 2): ii64-ii9
13. Felländer-Tsai L, Kjellin A, Wredmark T, Ahlberg G, Anderberg B, Enochsson L, Hedman L, Johnson E, Mäkinen K, Ramel S, Ström P, Särnå L, Westman B (2004) Basic accreditation for invasive image-guided intervention: a shift of paradigm in high technology education, embedding performance criterion levels in advanced medical simulators in a modern educational curriculum. J Inform Technol Healthcare 3: 165-173
14. Gallagher AG, Richie K, McClure N, McGuigan J (2001) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg 25: 1478-1483
15. Ghani JA, Deshpande PD (1994) The characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. J Psychol 128: 381-391
16. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91: 146-150
17. Hoffman HG (1998) Physically touching virtual objects using tactile augmentation enhances the realism of virtual objects IEEE. Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual Symposium, Atlanta, GA
18. Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McClure N (2001) Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 15: 1080-1084
19. Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura AM, Yuh DD (2005) Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129: 151-158
20. Lathan CE, Tracey MR, Sebrechts MM, Clawson DM, Higgins GA (2002) Using virtual environments as training simulators: measuring transfer. In: Stanney KM (ed). Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 414-434
21. Louis TA, Lavori PW, Bailar JC, Polansky M (1984) Crossover and self-controlled designs in clinical research. N Engl J Med 5: 24-31
22. Mårdberg B, Sjöberg A, Henrysson-Eidvall S (2000) BasIQ begåvningstest: manual. Psykologiförlaget AB, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 47-55
23. Moody L, Baber C, Arvanitis TN (2002) Objective surgical performance evaluation based on haptic feedback. Stud Health Technol Inform 85: 304-310
24. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 327: 1032-1037
25. Nakao M, Imanishi K, Kuroda T, Oyama H (2004) Practical haptic navigation with clickable 3D region input interface for supporting master-slave type robotic surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 98: 265-271
26. Nelson TW, Bolia RS (2002) Technological considerations in the design of multisensory virtual environments: the virtual field of dreams will have to wait. In: Stanney KM (ed). Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 301-311
27. Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaitouna R, Richardson C (2000) A redrawn Vanderberg and Kuse mental rotation test: different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn 28: 39-58
28. Popescu GV, Burdea CG, Treffitz H (2002) Multimodal interaction modelling. In: Stanney KM (ed). Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 435-454
29. Prystowsky JB, Regehr G, Rogers DA, Loan JP, Hiemenz LL, Smith KM (1999) A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement. Am J Surg 177: 171-175
30. Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2001) The science of training: a decade of progress. Annu Rev Psychol 52: 471-479
31. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236: 458-463; discussion 463-464
32. Stanney KM, Zyda M (2002) Environments in the 21st century: introductory chapter. In: Stanney KM (ed). Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 1-14
33. Strom P, Kjellin A, Hedman L, Johnson E, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L (2003) Validation and learning in the Procedicus KSA virtual reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 17: 227-231
34. Strom P, Kjellin A, Hedman L, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L (2004) Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance. Surg Endosc 18: 115-120
35. Wagner CR, Stylopoulos N, Howe RD (2002) The role of haptic feedback in surgery: analysis of blunt dissection. Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (HAPTICS) 39: 68-74
36. Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Anastakis DJ, Matsumoto ED, Cusimano MD (2002) Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially complex surgical skills. Lancet 359: 230-231
37. Wickens CD, Lee JD, Liu Y, Gordon Becker SE (2004) An introduction to human factors engineering. Pearson, Prentice Hall, NJ