Scoring function based on weighted residue network

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 8773-8786

  Jiao, Xiong ^a   Chang, Shan ^b  

^a TAIYUAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b SOUTH CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Protein protein docking; Residue network; Scoring function; Weighted parameter

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVALENT BOND; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PREDICTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PROCEDURES;

PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84055221808     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14220067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijms12128773     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Carter, P.; Lesk, V.I.; Islam, S.A.; Sternberg, M.J.E. Protein-protein docking using 3D-Dock in rounds 3, 4, and 5 of CAPRI. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2005, 60, 281-288.
2. Yu, H.; Wang, Z.L.; Qin, W.B.; Zhang, L.R. Structural basis for the specific interaction of chicken haemoglobin with bromophenol blue: A computational analysis. Mol. Phys. 2010, 108, 215-220.
3. Pons, C.; Grosdidier, S.; Solernou, A.; Perez-Cano, L.; Fernandez-Recio, J. Present and future challenges and limitations in protein-protein docking. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2010, 78, 95-108.
4. Grosdidier, S.; Fernandez-Recio, J. Docking and scoring: Applications to drug discovery in the interactomics era. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2009, 4, 673-686.
5. Grosdidier, S.; Pons, C.; Solernou, A.; Fernandez-Recio, J. Prediction and scoring of docking poses with pyDock. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2007, 69, 852-858.
6. Garzon, J.I.; Lopez-Blanco, J.R.; Pons, C.; Kovacs, J.; Abagyan, R.; Fernandez-Recio, J.; Chacon, P. FRODOCK: A new approach for fast rotational protein-protein docking. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2544-2551.
7. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions1. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 337-356.
8. Pons, C.; Solernou, A.; Perez-Cano, L.; Grosdidier, S.; Fernandez-Recio, J. Optimization of pyDock for the new CAPRI challenges: Docking of homology-based models, domain-domain assembly and protein-RNA binding. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2010, 78, 3182-3188.
9. Gabb, H.A.; Jackson, R.M.; Sternberg, M.J.E. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information1. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 272, 106-120.
10. Solernou, A.; Fernandez-Recio, J. pyDockCG: New coarse-grained potential for protein protein docking. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 6032-6039.
11. Pons, C.; Talavera, D.; de la Cruz, X.; Orozco, M.; Fernandez-Recio, J. Scoring by intermolecular pairwise propensities of exposed residues (SIPPER): A new efficient potential for protein-protein docking. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 370-377.
12. Pierce, B.; Weng, Z. ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2007, 67, 1078-1086.
13. Chang, S.; Jiao, X.; Li, C.H.; Gong, X.Q.; Chen, W.Z.; Wang, C.X. Amino acid network and its scoring application in protein-protein docking. Biophys. Chem. 2008, 134, 111-118.
14. Gong, X.Q.; Wang, P.W.; Yang, F.; Chang, S.; Liu, B.; He, H.Q.; Cao, L.B.; Xu, X.J.; Li, C.H.; Chen, W.Z. et al. Protein-protein docking with binding site patch prediction and network-based terms enhanced combinatorial scoring. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2010, 78, 3150-3155.
15. Solernou, A.; Fernandez-Recio, J. Protein docking by Rotation-Based Uniform Sampling (RotBUS) with fast computing of intermolecular contact distance and residue desolvation. BMC Bioinf. 2010, 11, 352:1-352:14.
16. Tavares, J.M.; Teixeira, P.I.C.; da Gama, M.M.T. How patchy can one get and still condense? The role of dissimilar patches in the interactions of colloidal particles. Mol. Phys. 2009, 107, 453-466.
17. Yu, H.Y.; Braun, P.; Yildirim, M.A.; Lemmens, I.; Venkatesan, K.; Sahalie, J.; Hirozane-Kishikawa, T.; Gebreab, F.; Li, N.; Simonis, N. et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 2008, 322, 104-110.
18. Scheerer, P.; Park, J.H.; Hildebrand, P.W.; Kim, Y.J.; Krauss, N.; Choe, H.W.; Hofmann, K.P.; Ernst, O.P. Crystal structure of opsin in its G-protein-interacting conformation. Nature 2008, 455, 497-502.
19. Vendruscolo, M.; Dokholyan, N.V.; Paci, E.; Karplus, M. Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 65, 061910:1-061910:4.
20. Theodorou, D.N. Understanding and predicting structure-property relations in polymeric materials through molecular simulations. Mol. Phys. 2004, 102, 147-166.
21. Amitai, G.; Shemesh, A.; Sitbon, E.; Shklar, M.; Netanely, D.; Venger, I.; Pietrokovski, S. Network analysis of protein structures identifies functional residues. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 344, 1135-1146.
22. Pons, C.; Glaser, F.; Fernandez-Recio, J. Prediction of protein-binding areas by small-world residue networks and application to docking. BMC Bioinf. 2011, 12, 378:1-378:10.
23. Chang, S.; Gong, X.Q.; Jiao, X.; Li, C.H.; Chen, W.Z.; Wang, C.X. Network analysis of protein-protein interaction. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2010, 55, 814-822.
24. Dokholyan, N.V.; Li, L.; Ding, F.; Shakhnovich, E.I. Topological determinants of protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 8637-8641.
25. Atilgan, A.R.; Akan, P.; Baysal, C. Small-world communication of residues and significance for protein dynamics. Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 85-91.
26. Aftabuddin, M.; Kundu, S. Weighted and unweighted network of amino acids within protein. Phys. A 2006, 369, 895-904.
27. Miyazawa, S.; Jernigan, R.L. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 256, 623-644.
28. Jiao, X.; Chang, S.; Li, C.; Wang, C. Construction and application of the weighted amino acid network based on energy. Phys. Rev. E 2007, 75, 051903:1-051903:6.
29. Cruzeiro, L.; Lopes, P.A. Are the native states of proteins kinetic traps? Mol. Phys. 2009, 107, 1485-1493.
30. Cross, J.B.; Thompson, D.C.; Rai, B.K.; Baber, J.C.; Fan, K.Y.; Hu, Y.B.; Humblet, C. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: Pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1455-1474.
31. Chen, R.; Mintseris, J.; Janin, J.; Weng, Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2003, 52, 88-91.
32. Bradley, P.; Chivian, D.; Meiler, J.; Misura, K.; Rohl, C.A.; Schief, W.R.; Wedemeyer, W.J.; Schueler-Furman, O.; Murphy, P.; Schonbrun, J. Rosetta predictions in CASP5: Successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2003, 53, 457-468.
33. Barrat, A.; Barthelemy, M.; Pastor-Satorras, R.; Vespignani, A. The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 3747-3752.
34. Barthelemy, M.; Barrat, A.; Pastor-Satorras, R.; Vespignani, A. Characterization and modeling of weighted networks. Phys. A 2005, 346, 34-43.
35. Moont, G.; Gabb, H.A.; Sternberg, M.J.E. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 1999, 35, 364-373.